Exploring the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD): A 2025 Guide for Materials and Drug Development Research

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive guide to the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD), the world's largest repository for fully determined inorganic crystal structures. Tailored for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals, it covers foundational knowledge, practical methodologies, and advanced applications. Readers will learn about the latest 2025 features, including expanded coordination polyhedra analysis and integration with tools like the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). The guide also addresses common troubleshooting during data deposition and explores the growing role of theoretical data in predicting new materials, positioning ICSD as an indispensable tool for accelerating innovation in materials science and biomedical research.

What is the ICSD? Unpacking the World's Largest Inorganic Crystal Database

ICSD Definition and Core Purpose in Materials Science

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) is the world's largest database for completely identified inorganic crystal structures, serving as a foundational resource for researchers, scientists, and professionals in materials science and related disciplines [1] [2] [3]. Established in the late 1970s through an initiative of Prof. Günter Bergerhoff at the University of Bonn, Germany, ICSD has been maintained and developed by FIZ Karlsruhe since 1985, with a period of cooperative production with the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) until 2017 [1]. This comprehensive collection contains crystal structure data dating back to 1913, with approximately 12,000 new structures added annually through continuous updates and quality assurance processes [2]. The core purpose of ICSD is to provide the scientific and industrial community with critically evaluated, comprehensive crystal-structure data that enables phase identification, materials discovery, and property prediction [1] [4]. As an indispensable tool for materials research, ICSD supports a wide range of scientific investigations from fundamental research to applied materials design and development.

Database Composition and Content

Scope and Coverage

ICSD provides an almost exhaustive compilation of known inorganic crystal structures published in the scientific literature, serving as the most complete database for inorganic crystal structures, including minerals, metals, alloys, and related compounds [1]. The database's comprehensive coverage spans over a century of research, making it an invaluable historical record of materials discovery and characterization. The scope has evolved to include not only traditional inorganic compounds but also metal-organic structures with relevant inorganic applications and theoretically predicted structures, reflecting the expanding boundaries of materials science research [1]. This expansion demonstrates ICSD's adaptability to emerging research trends while maintaining its core focus on structurally characterized inorganic materials.

Content Classification

ICSD entries are systematically categorized into three distinct classes based on the nature and determination method of the structural data:

• Experimental Inorganic Structures: These comprise the traditional core of ICSD and include structures that are either fully characterized with determined atomic coordinates and fully specified composition, or structures published with a structure type from which atomic coordinates and other parameters can be derived [1]. This category includes pure elements, minerals, metals, intermetallic compounds, and related inorganic materials that form the foundation of solid-state chemistry and materials science.

• Experimental Metal-Organic Structures: Reflecting evolving scientific boundaries, ICSD now includes metal-organic structures where the focus is on properties of metal or non-carbon elements, or where relevant inorganic applications or material properties are documented [1]. This expansion acknowledges the blurring distinction between inorganic and organic chemistry in advanced materials research, particularly in areas such as zeolites, catalysts, batteries, and gas storage systems.

• Theoretical Inorganic Structures: To support computational materials science, ICSD incorporates theoretically calculated structures that meet specific quality criteria, including publication in peer-reviewed journals, low total energy (E_tot)接近平衡结构, and calculation methods that yield results comparable to experimental data [1]. This growing collection supports data mining and materials prediction efforts in silico.

Table 1: Classification of Structure Types in ICSD

Structure Category	Description	Inclusion Criteria
Experimental Inorganic	Traditional inorganic compounds, minerals, elements, metals, and alloys	Fully characterized atomic coordinates and composition, or derivable from structure type
Experimental Metal-Organic	Organometallic compounds with inorganic applications or properties	Focus on metal/non-carbon element properties; inorganic applications or material properties available
Theoretical Inorganic	Computationally predicted structures	Peer-reviewed publication; low E(tot); methods yielding experimental-comparable results

Data Fields and Information Content

Each entry in ICSD contains comprehensive crystallographic and chemical information necessary for complete materials characterization. A typical entry includes the chemical name, formula, unit cell parameters, space group, complete atomic parameters (including atomic displacement parameters when available), site occupation factors, title, authors, and literature citation [1]. Beyond these primary data, ICSD enhances entries with valuable derived parameters through expert evaluation or computational generation, including Wyckoff sequence, molecular formula and weight, ANX formula, Pearson symbol, mineral group, and structure type assignments [1] [2]. Additionally, the database incorporates bibliographic data, abstracts, and keywords describing experimental methods, material properties, and potential applications, providing rich contextual information for research and development activities [1].

Research Applications and Methodologies

Core Research Applications in Materials Science

ICSD serves as an indispensable resource supporting diverse research applications across materials science and related disciplines:

• Phase Identification and Materials Characterization: Researchers routinely use ICSD for phase identification by comparing experimental diffraction patterns (X-ray, neutron, or electron) with calculated patterns from database entries [4] [5]. This application is fundamental to materials analysis in research laboratories, quality control, and failure analysis contexts, with an estimated 20,000 X-ray diffractometers and a comparable number of electron microscopes used daily for this purpose [5].

• Materials Development and Optimization: The database provides critical input for Rietveld refinement and serves as a foundation for developing new materials through data-mining parameters for structure prediction or optimization procedures [1]. By accessing the extensive collection of known structures, researchers can identify promising compositional ranges and structural motifs for targeted materials properties.

• Computational Materials Science and Data Mining: With the inclusion of theoretical structures and comprehensive search functionalities, ICSD supports emerging research approaches in computational materials science, including structure-property relationship studies, machine learning applications, and predictive materials design [1] [6]. The classification of approximately 80% of records into about 9,000 structure types enables efficient identification of substance classes and homologous series [2].

• Educational and Fundamental Research: ICSD provides students and researchers with access to carefully curated structural information for teaching crystallography, solid-state chemistry, and materials science, while also supporting fundamental research on crystal chemistry, bonding trends, and structural systematics across the periodic table.

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Structure Search and Identification Protocol

The following methodology outlines a standard workflow for phase identification using ICSD:

• Experimental Data Collection: Collect high-quality diffraction data (X-ray, neutron, or electron) from the unknown sample, ensuring appropriate instrument calibration and data collection parameters for the specific material system.

• Pattern Processing: Process raw diffraction data to determine peak positions and intensities, applying necessary corrections for instrument geometry, sample displacement, and other experimental factors.

• Unit Cell Determination: Extract unit cell parameters from the diffraction pattern using indexing methods, with potential refinement through whole-pattern fitting approaches.

• Database Query: Search ICSD using determined unit cell parameters (with appropriate tolerance for experimental error), space group information, and known chemical composition constraints. Utilize advanced search options such as reduced cell parameters, structure type, or element combinations.

• Candidate Evaluation: Compare experimental diffraction pattern with calculated patterns from potential database matches, considering both peak positions and relative intensities. Evaluate structural plausibility based on chemical reasoning and known phase relationships.

• Confirmation and Refinement: Use the best-matching structure model as a starting point for Rietveld refinement or other structural modeling approaches to confirm the identification and determine quantitative phase abundances.

Materials Design and Discovery Workflow

For materials design applications, researchers employ ICSD within a systematic workflow:

• Property Requirements Definition: Clearly define target material properties and operational constraints for the intended application.

• Structure-Property Relationship Analysis: Identify structural features associated with desired properties through data mining of ICSD entries with similar characteristics or documented properties.

• Compositional and Structural Screening: Search ICSD for isotypic compounds, solid solution series, or structural analogs that might exhibit enhanced or modified properties.

• Theoretical Prediction and Validation: For novel compositions, utilize theoretical structures from ICSD or computational methods to predict stability and properties before experimental verification.

• Synthesis Planning: Use structural information from analogous compounds in ICSD to guide synthesis parameters and anticipate potential polymorphs or competing phases.

• Experimental Verification and Refinement: Synthesize target materials and characterize using diffraction methods, with ICSD providing reference patterns for phase identification and structural modeling.

Diagram 1: ICSD Research Workflow

Data Quality and Curation Processes

Quality Assurance Framework

ICSD maintains exceptional data quality through rigorous curation processes implemented by expert editorial teams at FIZ Karlsruhe [1] [2]. Each structure undergoes thorough quality checks before inclusion, ensuring reliability and accuracy for research applications. The quality assurance framework includes:

• Critical Data Evaluation: Expert assessment of published structural data for internal consistency, chemical plausibility, and compliance with crystallographic principles.

• Cross-Validation Procedures: Verification of reported parameters through recalculation of derived properties, examination of interatomic distances and angles, and validation of space group assignments.

• Error Detection and Correction: Identification of common errors in original publications, with appropriate corrections applied and documented in remarks or comments within the database entry.

• Standardization and Classification: Application of consistent standards for data representation, including structure-type assignment, Wyckoff sequence determination, and classification according to established crystallographic schemes.

Structure Type Classification System

A distinctive feature of ICSD's curation is the comprehensive structure type classification applied to approximately 80% of the database records [1] [2]. This systematic organization enables powerful search and analysis capabilities:

• Classification Methodology: Structures are grouped into approximately 9,000 structure types based on the principles of being isopointal (same space group and same set of Wyckoff positions with the same multiplicities and site symmetries) and isoconfigurational (same atomic coordinates and same types of atoms at corresponding positions) [1].

• Practical Implementation: Classification utilizes easily verifiable properties including ANX formula, Pearson symbol, Wyckoff sequence, and c/a ratio as proxies for the fundamental isopointal and isoconfigurational relationships.

• Minimum Requirements: A new structure type is established only when at least two compounds can be assigned to it, ensuring meaningful classification rather than unique structural occurrences.

This sophisticated classification system transforms ICSD from a simple collection of structures into a knowledge base that reveals the fundamental relationships between chemical composition and crystal structure across the entire landscape of inorganic materials.

Table 2: ICSD Content Statistics and Growth Patterns

Content Metric	Value	Remarks
Total Structures	>210,000 entries [5]	Comprehensive coverage from 1913 to present
Annual Growth	~12,000 new structures [2]	Continuous addition with biannual updates
Structure Type Coverage	~80% of records [2]	Assigned to approximately 9,000 structure types
Theoretical Structures	Growing collection [1]	Subject to specific quality criteria
Journal Coverage	>80 primary + 1,400 additional [1]	Continuous extraction from scientific literature

Access Methods and Technical Implementation

Database Access Platforms

ICSD is disseminated through multiple platforms designed to meet diverse research needs and usage scenarios:

• ICSD Web: A browser-based interface providing comprehensive search capabilities and visualization tools for interactive use [7]. This platform offers user-friendly access to the complete database functionality without requiring local software installation.

• ICSD Desktop: A local installation option providing functionality essentially identical to the web interface, suitable for environments with limited internet connectivity or specific IT infrastructure requirements [1].

• ICSD API: Programmatic access for computational researchers requiring integration with custom workflows, data mining applications, or high-throughput screening pipelines [7]. This interface enables automated querying and retrieval for integration with research pipelines.

Search and Analysis Capabilities

ICSD provides specialized search functionalities tailored to materials research requirements:

• Basic Search Options: Chemical formula, element composition, compound name, mineral name, and bibliographic information.

• Advanced Crystallographic Searches: Unit cell parameters, space group, Wyckoff sequences, Pearson symbol, ANX formula, and structure type.

• Property and Application Searches: Keywords describing material properties, applications, and experimental methods.

• Theoretical Structure Searches: Filtering by calculation method (DFT, HF, LCAO, etc.), basis set information, and computational parameters.

The database also includes integrated analysis tools for reduced cell calculation, bond distance/angle determination, simulated powder diffraction pattern generation, and structure visualization, providing researchers with comprehensive analytical capabilities within a unified environment.

Diagram 2: ICSD Access Architecture

Research Reagent Solutions: Essential Tools for Crystallographic Analysis

Table 3: Essential Research Tools and Resources for Crystallographic Analysis

Research Tool	Function/Purpose	Implementation in ICSD Context
X-ray Diffractometer	Experimental determination of crystal structures through diffraction pattern collection	Primary instrument for generating experimental data comparable to ICSD reference patterns [5]
Electron Microscope	Microstructural characterization and nano-diffraction for phase identification	Complementary technique for materials not suitable for X-ray diffraction [5]
Rietveld Refinement Software	Whole-pattern fitting for quantitative phase analysis and structure refinement	Uses ICSD structures as starting models for refinement of experimental data [1]
Computational Materials Software	First-principles calculations for structure prediction and property computation	Generates theoretical structures meeting ICSD inclusion criteria; uses ICSD for validation [1]
Crystal Structure Visualizers	Three-dimensional representation of atomic arrangements	Integrated visualization of ICSD structures for analysis and interpretation [5]

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database represents an indispensable infrastructure for modern materials research, providing comprehensive, high-quality crystallographic data that supports diverse scientific and industrial applications. Through continuous curation and development, ICSD has maintained its position as the world's largest and most authoritative resource for inorganic crystal structures, evolving to encompass new categories of materials and support emerging research methodologies. The database's rigorous quality assurance procedures, sophisticated classification systems, and multiple access platforms ensure its utility for researchers across disciplines ranging from fundamental solid-state chemistry to applied materials engineering. As materials research increasingly incorporates computational approaches and data-driven discovery methods, ICSD's role as a foundational resource for materials informatics and design continues to expand, supporting innovation across technology sectors including healthcare, energy, communications, and electronics.

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) is the world's largest database for completely determined inorganic crystal structures, serving as an indispensable tool for materials science and crystallography [8]. Established in 1978 by Günter Bergerhoff at the University of Bonn and I. D. Brown at McMaster University [9], its mission was to create a comprehensive repository of published inorganic crystal structures. The database's scope is historically profound, containing records dating back to 1913, thereby providing a near-complete archive of over a century of crystallographic research [9] [10]. This extensive temporal coverage makes ICSD an invaluable resource for tracking the evolution of inorganic materials science. Since 1985, the database has been maintained by FIZ Karlsruhe, which took over sole production responsibilities in 2017 after a long-standing collaboration with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [1]. The database grows systematically, with approximately 16,000 new entries added annually, ensuring it remains current with modern research developments [8].

Table 1: ICSD Historical Growth and Content Distribution (As of 2025)

Category	Figure	Notes
Total Entries	318,000+ [9]	Data from 1913 to present
Annual New Entries	~16,000 [8]	Includes experimental and theoretical
Element Structures	>3,000 [10]	Pure elements
Binary Compounds	>43,000 [10]
Ternary Compounds	>79,000 [10]
Quaternary & Higher	>85,000 [10]

Core Data Composition and Quality Assurance

The ICSD contains a meticulously curated collection of several distinct classes of crystal structure data. Primarily, it includes experimental inorganic structures where atomic coordinates are fully determined and composition is completely specified [1]. A significant expansion in recent years has been the inclusion of experimental metal-organic structures, but only those with known inorganic applications or relevant material properties, deliberately excluding compounds with biotechnological, medical, or pharmaceutical focuses [1]. Perhaps the most transformative modern enhancement is the systematic incorporation of theoretical inorganic structures extracted from peer-reviewed journals, which must meet stringent criteria including low total energy (E_tot) and employ methods yielding results comparable to experimental data [11] [1].

The database's exceptional quality stems from rigorous curation protocols. All data undergoes thorough quality checks by an expert editorial team before inclusion [1] [10]. Data is sourced from over 80 major scientific journals and more than 1,400 additional periodic sources [1]. Each entry is enriched with standardized structural descriptors such as Pearson symbols, ANX formulas, and Wyckoff sequences, which are either expert-evaluated or computer-generated [1]. This commitment to quality was formally recognized with the awarding of the Core Trust Seal in 2023 [8]. The 2025 release introduced further enhancements including expanded representation of coordination polyhedra, uniform mineral naming and classification, and integration of external links to additional data sources [8].

Table 2: Theoretical Structure Data Categorization in ICSD

Category	Short Name	Description	Primary Research Application
Predicted (non-existing)	PRD	Theoretically predicted structures not yet synthesized	Synthesis planning for novel compounds and polymorphs [11]
Optimized (existing)	OPT	Theoretical calculations of known experimental structures	Property searches, nanostructure investigation, method development [11]
Combined Theoretical/Experimental	CMB	Manuscripts publishing both theoretical and experimental data	Validation of computational methods, high-precision data applications [11]

Research Applications and Methodologies

Protocol for Identification of Novel Battery Materials

The ICSD serves as a powerful discovery platform for emerging technologies. Researchers can identify promising, non-synthesized materials for specific applications like battery components through a structured protocol [11].

Methodology:

• Initial Filtering: Begin a search by selecting the "Theoretical structures" option to focus on computationally predicted materials.
• Category Selection: Under "Calculation Method," choose "Predicted (non-existing) crystal structure" to isolate structures awaiting synthesis.
• Keyword Refinement: Use the "Keyword" field with standardized terms (e.g., "battery," "solid electrolyte") to narrow the search to materials with targeted properties. This can refine results to less than a hundred highly relevant candidates from thousands of theoretical structures [11].
• Data Extraction: Execute the query and analyze the resulting CIF files for structural descriptors, theoretical lattice parameters, and calculated properties to prioritize candidates for synthesis.

Protocol for Computational Method Development

For researchers developing new computational methods, the ICSD provides a benchmark dataset of optimized structures.

Methodology:

• Target Selection: Select "Theoretical structures" and under "Calculation Method," choose "Optimized (existing) crystal structure."
• Method Filtering: Specify the computational method of interest (e.g., "Projector augmented wave (PAW)") to find structures calculated with that approach. This single filter can yield over 1,300 structures [11].
• Parameter Extraction: Locate the "Comment" field within search results, which contains crucial computational details such as the software code, basis set, cutoff energy (e.g., "Cutoff energy 400 eV"), and k-point mesh. Searching for these specific parameters allows researchers to build datasets with known computational settings, essential for reproducibility and method validation [11].
• Data Mining: The resulting dataset enables the generation of parameters for future calculations and direct comparison of different computational methods against established experimental data.

Protocol for Nanostructure Research

The ICSD enables sophisticated searches for nanostructures by combining theoretical data with standardized keywords.

Methodology:

• Foundation Search: Initiate a search for "Theoretical structures" categorized as "Optimized (existing)" or "Combination of theoretical and experimental."
• Keyword Application: In the "Bibliography" section, use the standardized keyword "Nano" in the keyword field. This filters the results to studies focusing on nanostructures.
• Result Analysis: Executing this combined search yields hundreds of relevant structures (e.g., 404 for optimized + nano) [11]. Analyzing these entries reveals that bulk crystal structure files (e.g., elemental Mo) are often published in the context of predicting fundamentally different nanostructures, such as molybdenum nanowires with non-bulk configurations [11].
• Leverage Combined Data: For the highest-value data, prioritize entries in the "Combination of theoretical and experimental structure" category, as these provide direct computational validation and often include detailed analyses of nanoparticles and nanorods [11].

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for ICSD-Based Research

Item / Resource	Function / Description	Relevance to ICSD Research
ICSD Desktop/Web Interface	Primary software for querying the database, offering both local installation and web-based access [1].	Enables complex searches using structural descriptors, elements, keywords, and bibliographic data.
CIF (Crystallographic Information File)	Standardized file format containing structural data, metadata, and experimental or computational details [11].	The primary data carrier for ICSD entries; essential for data transfer and analysis in other software.
Theoretical Calculation Metadata	Technical parameters from publications (e.g., Code, Functional, Cutoff Energy, k-point mesh) [11].	Found in the "Comment" field; critical for assessing computational reproducibility and quality.
Standardized Keywords	Controlled vocabulary for properties (electronic, magnetic) and applications (batteries, solar cells) [11].	Allows for precise filtering of millions of structures to find materials with specific behaviors or uses.
Structural Descriptors	System-generated data: Pearson symbol, ANX formula, Wyckoff sequence, structure type [1].	Enables identification of isopointal structures and classification of crystal systems beyond chemical composition.

Workflow Visualization

ICSD Research Pathway Diagram: This workflow outlines the systematic process for leveraging the ICSD, from defining a research objective through to final application, highlighting key decision points for data category and filter selection.

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) is the world's largest database for completely determined inorganic crystal structures, serving the scientific and industrial community with comprehensive, curated data essential for materials research [1]. Established in 1978 through an initiative by Prof. Günter Bergerhoff, the ICSD has been maintained by FIZ Karlsruhe and has grown into an indispensable resource containing an almost exhaustive list of known inorganic crystal structures published since 1913 [1] [9]. The database's primary strength lies in its extensive collection of crystal structures that have passed thorough quality checks by an expert editorial team, ensuring data of excellent quality and reliability that has been trusted by the community for over 35 years [1].

The scope of the ICSD has significantly expanded from its initial focus on experimental structures to now include theoretical crystal structure data, reflecting the evolving landscape of materials research where computational predictions play an increasingly important role [12]. This expansion allows researchers to compare calculated structures with each other and directly with experimental data, bridging the gap between theoretical and experimental materials science [1]. The database is updated biannually and includes structural data of pure elements, minerals, metals, and intermetallic compounds, along with structural descriptors, bibliographic data, abstracts, and keywords on methods, properties, and applications [1] [13].

Table 1: ICSD Content Overview by Data Category

Data Category	Description	Content Examples
Experimental Inorganic Structures	Fully characterized structures with determined atomic coordinates and fully specified composition	Pure elements, minerals, metals, intermetallic compounds
Experimental Metal-Organic Structures	Structures with known inorganic applications or relevant material properties	Zeolites, catalysts, battery materials, gas storage systems
Theoretical Inorganic Structures	Structures from peer-reviewed journals with low E(tot) and comparable to experimental results	Predicted (non-existing) structures, optimized existing structures

Quantitative Database Composition

The ICSD contains a substantial and growing collection of crystal structures, with the 2021.1 release containing over 240,000 crystal structures [13]. This vast repository includes more than 3,000 crystal structures of elements, over 43,000 records for binary compounds, approximately 79,000 records for ternary compounds, and more than 85,000 records for quaternary and quinary compounds [13]. The data is sourced from more than 1,600 periodicals, with continuous extraction and abstraction of original data from over 80 leading scientific journals and more than 1,400 other scientific journals [1] [13].

The inclusion of theoretical structures beginning in 2017 has significantly expanded the database's scope and utility for computational materials science. As of the 2019.2 release, the theoretical content included 3,860 predicted (non-existing) crystal structures, 2,461 optimized existing crystal structures, and 1,368 structures representing combinations of theoretical and experimental work [11]. Approximately 80% of the records in ICSD are assigned to one of around 9,000 structure types, with a new structure type only included if at least two compounds can be assigned to it [1].

Table 2: Detailed Quantitative Composition of the ICSD

Content Type	Number of Entries	Specific Details
Total Crystal Structures	>240,000	Data from 1913 to present [13]
Elements	>3,000	Pure element crystal structures [13]
Binary Compounds	>43,000	Compounds consisting of two elements [13]
Ternary Compounds	>79,000	Compounds consisting of three elements [13]
Quaternary & Quinary	>85,000	Complex compounds with 4-5 elements [13]
Source Publications	>1,600 periodicals	Including 80+ leading scientific journals [1] [13]

Experimental Structure Data

Experimental Inorganic Structures

Experimental inorganic structures form the foundational core of the ICSD, encompassing completely characterized structures where atomic coordinates are determined and composition is fully specified [1]. These structures include pure elements, minerals, metals, and intermetallic compounds, providing comprehensive coverage of inorganic crystalline materials [13]. Each entry typically includes the chemical name, formula, unit cell parameters, space group, complete atomic parameters (including atomic displacement parameters where available), site occupation factors, title, authors, and literature citation [1].

A distinctive feature of the ICSD's approach to experimental structures is the inclusion of structures published with a structure type, where atomic coordinates and other parameters can be derived from existing data [1]. This significantly enhances the database's utility for researchers working with structural families and analog compounds. Beyond the published data, the ICSD editorial team adds considerable value through expert evaluation and computational generation of additional descriptors, including Wyckoff sequence, Pearson symbol, ANX formula, mineral group, and structure type information [1].

Experimental Metal-Organic Structures

Reflecting evolving scientific boundaries, the ICSD has expanded to include metal-organic structures that exhibit inorganic applications or relevant material properties [1]. This expansion acknowledges that the distinction between inorganic and organic structures has become increasingly vague in research areas such as zeolites, catalysts, batteries, and gas storage systems [1]. The inclusion criteria focus on whether the research emphasis is on the properties of the metal or non-carbon elements, particularly the metal-carbon bond or inorganic partial structure [1].

The database specifically excludes structures with biotechnological, medical, or pharmaceutical content, maintaining its focus on materials with clear inorganic relevance [1]. For metal-organic structures, the ICSD offers specialized search functionalities, including group searches for organometallic compounds, sum formula searches, compound name searches, element-based searches, and text searches in abstracts, plus keywords for applications and material properties [1].

Theoretical Structure Data

Theoretical Structure Inclusion Criteria

The ICSD incorporates theoretical inorganic structures through a rigorous selection process to ensure data quality and relevance [1]. Three major criteria guide this selection: structures must be published in peer-reviewed journals; structures must demonstrate low total energy (E(tot)), indicating proximity to equilibrium structure; and the computational methods used must yield results comparable to experimental outcomes [1]. This careful curation addresses the challenge of the vast amount of theoretical calculations existing in varying quality levels, ensuring only theoretically sound and scientifically valuable structures are included.

The theoretical structures are clearly categorized and separated from experimental structures in the database, allowing researchers to search specifically for theoretical data or any combination of theoretical and experimental structures [1]. Each theoretical entry is complemented with comprehensive computational details, including the specific code and search algorithm used, method/functional employed, basis set information, and technical details of the calculation such as cutoff energy and k-point mesh [1]. This detailed metadata ensures reproducibility and enables researchers to assess the computational quality and appropriateness for their specific applications.

Classification of Theoretical Structures

The ICSD classifies theoretical structures into three primary categories, each serving distinct research purposes [1] [11]. Predicted (non-existing) crystal structures (PRD) represent compounds not yet synthesized and serve as excellent tools for synthesis planning [11]. Optimized (existing) crystal structures (OPT) are theoretical calculations of known experimental structures that can be used for property searches or nanostructure investigations [11]. Combination structures (CMB) integrate both theoretical and experimental approaches within the same publication, providing highly valuable data for materials scientists [11].

Additionally, the database categorizes theoretical structures by the computational method used, with 13 major methods identified [1]. These include Ab Initio optimization (ABIN), Density Functional Theory (DFT), Plane Waves method (PW), Projector Augmented Wave method (PAW), Hartree-Fock method (HF), Hybrid Functionals (HYB), and several other prominent computational approaches [1]. This methodological classification enables researchers to selectively retrieve structures calculated using specific computational frameworks relevant to their work.

Research Applications and Methodologies

Experimental Protocols and Data Quality Assurance

The ICSD maintains exceptional data quality through rigorous editorial protocols and validation procedures. Each structure undergoes thorough quality checks by expert editors before inclusion, with thousands of new structures added annually and existing structures regularly revised, corrected, and updated [1]. The editorial team generates remarks or comments to explain or highlight possible inconsistencies in structures or describe actions taken during input to resolve observed problems [1]. This meticulous curation process ensures the database maintains its reputation for high data quality trusted by the research community.

The value-added data processing includes the assignment of structure types based on the principles of isopointal and isoconfigurational structures, with approximately 80% of records assigned to one of around 9,000 structure types [1]. Easily checkable properties like the ANX formula, Pearson symbol, Wyckoff sequence, and c/a ratio facilitate this classification [1]. Additionally, keywords describing applied experimental methods, material properties, and potential applications enhance the searchability and contextual understanding of the structures [1].

Methodologies for Utilizing Theoretical Structures

The theoretical structures in ICSD enable sophisticated research methodologies across various domains of materials science. Predicted structures serve as powerful tools for synthesis planning, allowing researchers to identify potentially synthesizable compounds with desirable properties before investing resources in experimental work [11]. These structures are particularly valuable for searching new materials for specific technological applications, such as battery materials, where researchers can narrow searches to less than a hundred predicted structures with targeted properties [11].

Optimized structures enable fine-tuning of materials for industrial and technological applications, as slight deviations between calculation and experiment can lead to significantly different material properties [11]. In computational materials science, these structures facilitate method development and parameter generation for future calculations [11]. Researchers can efficiently locate structures calculated with specific methods and parameters—for instance, finding 182 structures calculated using the Projector Augmented Wave method with a cutoff energy of 400 eV—enabling detailed analysis and data mining [11].

Combined theoretical and experimental structures provide particularly valuable insights, especially in emerging fields like nanotechnology. For example, researchers can identify studies where theoretical calculations complement experimental work on nanostructures, such as investigations of molybdenum nanowires with non-bcc configurations or adsorption studies on titanium dioxide nanoparticles [11]. These integrated approaches provide high-precision data with broad scientific and technological applications.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Computational Tools for ICSD-Based Research

Research Tool	Function/Application	Relevance to ICSD Research
Ab Initio Optimization (ABIN)	First-principles structure prediction and optimization	Generating predicted (PRD) and optimized (OPT) structures
Density Functional Theory (DFT)	Electronic structure calculation for materials properties	Primary method for theoretical structure optimization
Projector Augmented Wave (PAW)	Pseudopotential approach for electronic structure	Common method for accurate structure calculations
Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO)	Basis set approach for electronic structure calculation	Alternative method for theoretical structure determination
Hybrid Functionals (HYB)	Advanced exchange-correlation functionals	Improved accuracy for electronic property prediction
Structure Type Analysis	Classification of structures into isopointal groups	Facilitates searching and comparison of 9,000+ structure types
Wyckoff Sequence Analysis	Description of crystallographic site occupations	Enables structural similarity searches and group analysis
ANX Formula System	Classification based on anion/cation ratios	Structural taxonomy beyond chemical composition

The ICSD's composition of over 240,000 experimental and theoretical structures represents an invaluable resource for the research community, providing comprehensive coverage of inorganic crystal structures with rigorously maintained data quality [1] [13]. The strategic inclusion of theoretical structures since 2017 has positioned the database at the forefront of modern materials research, where computational prediction and experimental validation increasingly converge [11] [12]. This integrated approach enables diverse research applications, from synthesis planning and property optimization to method development and nanomaterial design.

As materials research continues to evolve toward more theory-oriented approaches, the ICSD's role in providing curated, classified, and standardized theoretical data alongside experimental structures becomes increasingly vital [1]. The database's robust classification systems, specialized search functionalities, and detailed computational metadata create a powerful infrastructure for advancing materials discovery and optimization [1] [11]. For researchers across chemistry, physics, materials science, and related disciplines, the ICSD remains an indispensable tool for navigating the complex landscape of inorganic crystal structures and accelerating the development of new materials with tailored properties and applications.

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) is the world's largest database for fully determined inorganic crystal structures, serving as an indispensable tool for researchers in materials science and crystallography [8]. This comprehensive collection covers inorganic and organometallic structures as well as theoretically calculated structure models, with the database growing at a rate of over 16,000 new entries annually [8]. The ICSD represents a cornerstone resource for academic and industrial research, providing critically evaluated data that underpins materials discovery and development across multiple disciplines. For researchers and drug development professionals working with inorganic compounds, the database offers reliable structural models that are essential for understanding material properties, predicting behavior, and designing new substances with tailored characteristics.

The database's scope encompasses a wide spectrum of inorganic materials, including ceramics, minerals, and intermetallic compounds, making it particularly valuable for investigations into solid-state chemistry, materials design, and property prediction [14]. The strategic importance of the ICSD lies in its role as a foundational resource that enables researchers to bypass extensive literature searches and access standardized, verified structural information. By providing immediate access to crystallographic data, the database accelerates research workflows and enhances the reliability of computational and experimental studies in inorganic materials science.

Table 1: Key Metadata for the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database

Attribute	Specification
Total Entries	Over 307,301 crystal structures [15]
Annual Growth	~16,000 new entries [8]
Temporal Coverage	Literature from 1913 to present [14]
Data Providers	FIZ Karlsruhe and NIST [14] [15]
Access Type	Restricted (fee-required) [15]
Certification	Core Trust Seal (since 2023) [8]

Database Content and Structural Classification

Compositional Classes of Inorganic Compounds

The ICSD comprehensively covers several major classes of inorganic compounds, each with distinct structural characteristics and applications. Ceramic materials are defined as inorganic, nonmetallic solids prepared from powdered materials and fabricated into products through the application of heat [16]. These materials typically exhibit covalent and ionic bonding that is much stronger than metallic bonding, resulting in characteristic properties including high hardness, high compressive strength, and chemical inertness, though often with low ductility and tensile strength [16]. The crystal structures of ceramics range from relatively simple to highly complex, with microstructures that may be entirely crystalline, entirely glassy, or a combination of both [16]. The main compositional classes of engineering ceramics include oxides, nitrides, and carbides, each with distinctive structural motifs and property profiles.

Mineral compounds represent naturally occurring crystalline phases with structures that have been standardized within the ICSD through uniform naming and classification systems [8]. The American Mineralogist Crystal Structure Database, which includes structures published in major mineralogical journals, contributes to this effort and is beginning to include structures from Physics and Chemistry of Minerals [17]. Intermetallic compounds consist of ordered solid-state phases involving two or more metallic elements, exhibiting definite stoichiometry and crystal structure distinct from their constituent elements. These compounds are characterized by metallic bonding with varying degrees of ionic or covalent character, resulting in unique mechanical and physical properties valuable for high-temperature and specialized applications.

Structural Data and Quality Assurance

The ICSD provides comprehensive structural data for all entries, including cell parameters, atom positions, displacement parameters, and full bibliographic information [15]. Each entry undergoes extensive evaluation and correction by senior experts to ensure data quality, with continuous selection, verification, and enrichment processes [8] [15]. The database implementation includes a quality marking system that identifies records meeting high-quality standards, providing users with reliability indicators when selecting among multiple records for the same compound [18].

Recent enhancements to the ICSD include expanded representation and analysis of coordination polyhedra, which provides researchers with more detailed information about the local bonding environments of atoms [8]. The integration of external links allows users to access additional data sources for further information, creating a more connected research ecosystem [8]. For mineral compounds, uniform naming and classification systems facilitate standardized searching and comparison across related structures [8].

Table 2: Quantitative Overview of Compound Classes in ICSD Research

Compound Class	Representative Examples	Key Structural Features	Prominent Research Applications
Ceramic Oxides	Alumina (Al₂O₃), Y-Ba-Cu-O superconductors	Close-packed oxygen arrays with cation interstitial ordering	High-temperature superconductors, Structural ceramics, Piezoelectrics
Minerals	Quartz (SiO₂), Calcite (CaCO₃)	Complex silicate networks, Carbonate groups	Geothermometry, Environmental monitoring, Materials sourcing
Intermetallics	NiAl, TiAl, Fe₃Al	Ordered superlattices, Laves phases, Heusler compounds	Lightweight high-temperature alloys, Magnetic materials, Shape-memory alloys
Coordination Compounds	[Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻, [Cu(NH₃)₄]²⁺	Central metal ion with ligand coordination spheres	Catalysis, Molecular magnets, Biomedical imaging

Research Applications and Experimental Methodologies

Structure Analysis and Materials Development

The ICSD serves as a fundamental resource for advanced structural analysis techniques, particularly Rietveld analysis, which refines crystal structure parameters directly from powder diffraction data. As noted by Dr. Takanori Itoh of NISSAN ARC, LTD., "ICSD is convenient because I can quickly get crystallographic data such as crystal structures and cell parameters of various compounds without reading papers one by one" [18]. The database provides essential initial structural models that serve as starting points for Rietveld refinement workflows, significantly reducing the time required for structure solution from experimental diffraction data. The reliability of ICSD data has been validated through real-world application, with instances where database curators identified errors in submitted structures, leading to corrections in published work [18].

For first-principles calculations, the ICSD supplies the critical atomic coordinates necessary for setting up computational models. These calculations enable researchers to predict material properties, including electronic structure, thermodynamic stability, and mechanical behavior, before undertaking synthetic work. The integration of ICSD data with computational approaches has enabled large-scale materials screening initiatives, such as the Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD), which consists of nearly 300,000 density functional theory (DFT) calculations of compounds primarily sourced from the ICSD [19]. The apparent mean absolute error between experimental formation energies and DFT calculations based on ICSD structures is approximately 0.096 eV/atom, with a significant portion of this error potentially attributable to experimental uncertainties themselves, which show a mean absolute error of 0.082 eV/atom between different experimental measurements [19].

Advanced Characterization Techniques

The integration of ICSD data with synchrotron X-ray diffraction and neutron diffraction experiments enables high-precision structure determination, particularly for light elements such as lithium in battery materials [18]. These advanced radiation sources provide enhanced resolution and sensitivity compared to conventional laboratory X-ray instruments. For mapping structural parameters, researchers are developing techniques to visualize three-dimensional distributions of cell parameters, occupancy factors, and other structural features across heterogeneous materials, analogous to imaging methods in scanning electron microscopy or Raman spectroscopy [18].

The maximum entropy method combined with Rietveld analysis of synchrotron XRD data enables detailed discussion of electron density distributions when using ICSD's CIF files as initial structural models [18]. This approach provides insights into chemical bonding and electronic structure that complement the purely structural information from standard refinement approaches. For drug development professionals working with inorganic pharmaceutical compounds or diagnostic agents, these advanced characterization methods facilitate understanding of structure-activity relationships that determine biological interactions.

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Inorganic Materials Characterization

Research Reagent/Equipment	Technical Function	Application Context
ICSD CIF Files	Initial structural models for refinement	Rietveld analysis, First-principles calculations
RIETAN-FP Software	Rietveld analysis implementation	Quantitative phase analysis, Structure refinement from powder data
VESTA Visualization	Crystal structure modeling and analysis	3D structure representation, CIF format conversion
Synchrotron Radiation	High-intensity X-ray source	High-resolution diffraction, Light element detection
Neutron Sources	Neutron diffraction capability	Light element positioning, Magnetic structure determination
First-Principles Codes	Electronic structure calculation	Property prediction, Stability assessment

Practical Implementation and Research Protocols

Rietveld Analysis Methodology

The Rietveld method represents a powerful approach for extracting detailed structural information from powder diffraction data. The step-by-step protocol begins with data collection using X-ray, neutron, or electron diffraction techniques, with careful attention to instrumental parameters and measurement conditions. For battery materials such as lithium compounds, synchrotron radiation sources are particularly valuable due to their ability to provide high-resolution data for light elements [18]. The subsequent initial model selection involves searching the ICSD for isostructural compounds that can serve as starting points for refinement, with priority given to entries marked as high-quality data [18].

The core refinement process involves sequential adjustment of structural parameters, including scale factors, lattice parameters, atomic coordinates, occupancy factors, and displacement parameters. As noted by Dr. Itoh, "few people are trying to extract a lot of information from XRD data," making this a specialized skill that provides competitive advantage to those who master it [18]. Particular care must be taken to avoid correlating parameters such as zero-shift and cell parameters, which can lead to incorrect structural solutions if not properly handled [18]. The final stage involves validation and quality assessment using reliability factors and comparison with known structural principles, with the refined model providing insights into structure-property relationships.

Data Mining and Materials Discovery

The ICSD enables sophisticated data mining approaches that identify trends and patterns across the extensive collection of inorganic structures. Researchers can search the database using multiple criteria, including bibliographic information, chemistry, unit cell parameters, space group, and mineral name/group [14]. These search capabilities facilitate the identification of structure-property relationships that guide the design of new materials with targeted characteristics. For example, analysis of historical data within the ICSD has enabled researchers to predict the existence of approximately 3,200 new compounds that have not yet been experimentally characterized [19].

The integration of ICSD data with high-throughput computational screening has emerged as a powerful paradigm for materials discovery. The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD), which consists of nearly 300,000 DFT calculations based primarily on ICSD structures, represents a prominent example of this approach [19]. By combining experimental structural data with computational energy calculations, researchers can identify promising synthetic targets that are likely to be thermodynamically stable. This strategy accelerates the materials development process by prioritizing experimental efforts on the most promising candidates, particularly in emerging fields such as energy storage, catalysis, and electronic materials.

Future Directions and Concluding Perspectives

The ICSD continues to evolve with enhancements that expand its utility for modern materials research. Recent developments include improved analysis of coordination polyhedra and mineral standardization, which provide researchers with more detailed structural information and consistent classification schemes [8]. The certification of the database with the Core Trust Seal in 2023 further establishes its reliability as a research resource [8]. Looking forward, the integration of ICSD data with emerging research technologies such as machine learning and artificial intelligence promises to unlock new opportunities for materials discovery and design.

For the pharmaceutical research community, inorganic compounds play increasingly important roles as therapeutic agents, diagnostic tools, and delivery systems. The structural information provided by the ICSD facilitates rational design of these materials by establishing connections between atomic-scale arrangement and biological function. As structural databases continue to grow and integrate with computational resources, researchers gain increasingly powerful capabilities for predicting material behavior before synthesis, potentially accelerating development timelines and enhancing success rates in drug development programs.

The ongoing curation and expansion of the ICSD ensures that it remains a vital resource for the global research community, supporting innovation across fields ranging from fundamental solid-state chemistry to applied pharmaceutical development. By providing standardized, validated structural data for inorganic materials, the database serves as a foundation for advancing our understanding of structure-property relationships and designing the next generation of functional materials.

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) is the world's largest database for fully determined inorganic crystal structures, serving as an indispensable tool for materials science and crystallography [20]. This comprehensive resource contains crystallographic data of published inorganic and organometallic structures alongside theoretically calculated structure models, growing at a rate of over 16,000 new entries per year [20]. The materials community in both science and industry relies on these crystallographic data models daily to visualize, explain, and predict the behavior of chemicals and materials [21].

The 2025 Scientific Manual, released by FIZ Karlsruhe, provides a comprehensive overview of the ICSD's content, curation processes, and latest enhancements [20]. This manual represents a significant milestone in the database's development, offering researchers improved methodologies for materials research and design. The ICSD has been certified with the Core Trust Seal since 2023, ensuring data quality through continuous selection, verification, and enrichment processes [20]. For the research community, particularly those in drug development where inorganic compounds play crucial roles in pharmaceuticals and delivery systems, these enhancements translate to more efficient discovery processes and reliable materials characterization.

Key Enhancements in the 2025 Scientific Manual

Expanded Coordination Polyhedra Analysis

The 2025 Manual introduces significantly expanded representation and analysis capabilities for coordination polyhedra, enabling more detailed descriptions of local coordination environments in crystal structures [20]. This enhancement allows researchers to systematically classify and compare structural motifs across different compound families, revealing patterns that may correlate with material properties or reactivity.

For pharmaceutical researchers working with metal-organic frameworks for drug delivery or metallopharmaceuticals, this improved polyhedral analysis facilitates better understanding of coordination geometry stability and prediction of host-guest interactions. The manual provides standardized protocols for determining coordination numbers, identifying ligand types, and calculating polyhedral distortion indices, creating a consistent framework for structural comparison across research groups.

Mineral Standardization and Nomenclature

A major advancement in the 2025 Manual is the implementation of uniform naming and classification of minerals as part of a comprehensive mineral standardization initiative [20]. This systematic approach resolves previous inconsistencies in mineral nomenclature that complicated literature searches and data correlation.

The standardization framework includes:

• Hierarchical classification based on crystal chemistry principles
• Structured naming conventions reflecting compositional and structural relationships
• Cross-referencing systems linking synonymous mineral names
• Compositional groupings for solid solution series

This standardization is particularly valuable for drug development researchers studying biominerals or utilizing mineral-based excipients, as it enables more precise identification of crystalline phases in complex biological systems.

Enhanced Data Integration and Interoperability

The 2025 Manual significantly improves data accessibility through the integration of external links that allow users to seamlessly access additional data sources for further information [20]. This interoperability creates connections between crystallographic data and complementary resources including thermodynamic databases, electronic structure repositories, and materials property collections.

For experimental researchers, this integration enables a more holistic materials characterization workflow. The manual provides specific protocols for leveraging these connected resources to correlate structural features with functional properties, potentially accelerating the identification of candidate materials for specific pharmaceutical applications.

Technical Specifications and Data Presentation

Quantitative Database Metrics

The table below summarizes key quantitative metrics for the ICSD database as detailed in the 2025 Scientific Manual:

Table 1: ICSD Database Quantitative Metrics

Parameter	Specification	Research Application
Database Size	World's largest inorganic crystal structure database	Comprehensive reference for materials discovery
Annual Growth	>16,000 new entries per year [20]	Continuous knowledge expansion
Content Types	Experimental & theoretical structures [20]	Computational and experimental validation
Data Certification	Core Trust Seal (since 2023) [20]	Quality assurance for critical research

Research Reagent Solutions for Crystallographic Studies

Table 2: Essential Research Materials for Crystallographic Analysis

Research Reagent/Material	Function in Crystallographic Research
ICSD Database	Primary reference data for phase identification and structural analysis [20]
Coordination Polyhedra Analysis Tools	Quantitative description of local atomic environments [20]
Mineral Standardization Frameworks	Consistent classification of natural and synthetic mineral phases [20]
External Data Integration Interfaces	Cross-referencing with complementary materials data sources [20]
Powder Diffraction Simulation Software	Pattern calculation for experimental data comparison [20]

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Protocol for Coordination Environment Analysis

The 2025 Manual provides a standardized methodology for systematic analysis of coordination polyhedra, essential for understanding metal ion environments in pharmaceutical compounds:

• Coordination Number Determination

  • Identify all atoms within the maximum bond distance of the central atom
  • Apply bond valence analysis to validate bonding interactions
  • Document coordination geometry using polyhedral descriptors

• Polyhedral Parameter Calculation

  • Calculate the effective coordination number
  • Determine the spherical harmonic descriptors for shape quantification
  • Compute the polyhedral volume and distortion indices

• Structural Comparison

  • Use the standardized polyhedral descriptors to identify structural relationships
  • Classify structures into prototype families based on coordination environments
  • Identify anomalous coordination geometries that may indicate special properties

This protocol enables drug development researchers to systematically compare the coordination environments of metal ions in different host frameworks, predicting stability and reactivity patterns relevant to pharmaceutical formulation.

Mineral Phase Identification Workflow

The manual details a rigorous experimental protocol for mineral phase identification using the new standardization system:

• Compositional Analysis

  • Obtain elemental composition through EDS or equivalent techniques
  • Normalize composition to standard oxide or elemental components
  • Apply the IMA-CNMNC classification rules for preliminary identification

• Structural Characterization

  • Collect X-ray diffraction data following standardized experimental parameters
  • Index the diffraction pattern and determine unit cell parameters
  • Compare with ICSD reference patterns using the new mineral classification

• Phase Assignment

  • Apply the hierarchical mineral classification system
  • Document the phase using the standardized nomenclature
  • Cross-reference with related phases in the solid solution series

This workflow is particularly valuable for identifying and characterizing excipient minerals in pharmaceutical formulations, ensuring consistent composition and properties.

Visualization of Research Workflows

ICSD Data Integration and Research Pathway

Coordination Polyhedra Analysis Methodology

Implications for Materials Research and Drug Development

The enhancements detailed in the 2025 Scientific Manual have significant implications for research efficiency and discovery in materials science and pharmaceutical development. The expanded coordination polyhedra analysis enables more precise prediction of metal-ligand interactions in metallodrugs and imaging agents, while the mineral standardization facilitates accurate identification of crystalline phases in pharmaceutical formulations and biomineralization studies [20].

For drug development professionals, these advancements translate to improved ability to:

• Predict stability of metal-containing pharmaceuticals through detailed coordination environment analysis
• Identify and characterize crystalline excipients using standardized mineral nomenclature
• Correlate structural features with dissolution behavior and bioavailability
• Design targeted synthesis of metal-organic frameworks for drug delivery applications

The integration of external data sources creates unprecedented opportunities for multidisciplinary research, connecting crystallographic data with pharmacological properties and toxicological profiles [20]. This interoperability is particularly valuable for preformulation studies where crystalline form selection can significantly impact drug product performance.

The 2025 Scientific Manual for the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database represents a substantial advancement in the accessibility and research utility of crystallographic data. Through its enhanced coordination polyhedra analysis, standardized mineral nomenclature, and improved data integration capabilities, the manual provides researchers with sophisticated tools for materials characterization and discovery [20].

For the pharmaceutical research community, these developments offer more robust methodologies for understanding structure-property relationships in inorganic compounds relevant to drug development. The standardized protocols and enhanced analytical capabilities support more efficient and reproducible research, potentially accelerating the development of novel inorganic-based pharmaceuticals and delivery systems.

As the ICSD continues to grow with over 16,000 new entries annually, the 2025 Scientific Manual ensures that researchers can fully leverage this expanding knowledge resource through improved data quality, enhanced analytical frameworks, and seamless connectivity to complementary data sources [20].

How to Use the ICSD: From Basic Searches to Advanced Research Applications

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) stands as a foundational resource in the field of materials science and crystallography, providing critically evaluated data essential for the development of advanced crystalline materials used across technology sectors including health care, communications, and energy [4]. As the world's largest database for completely identified inorganic crystal structures, ICSD contains comprehensive crystallographic information for more than 240,000 inorganic compounds, with data records extending back to 1913 [2] [10]. For researchers engaged in inorganic materials research, mastering three core search capabilities—composition, mineral name, and space group—is fundamental to leveraging the full potential of this extensive database. These search parameters enable efficient navigation through vast crystallographic data, facilitating phase identification, materials discovery, and crystal chemical analysis critical to scientific advancement and drug development applications where inorganic compounds serve as active pharmaceutical ingredients or excipients.

The ICSD represents a collaborative effort between the Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe (FIZ) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), maintaining rigorous quality standards through continuous data validation and expert evaluation [4] [2]. The database encompasses several categories of crystal structures, including experimental inorganic structures (both fully characterized and those published with a structure type), experimental metal-organic structures with relevant material properties, and theoretical inorganic structures extracted from peer-reviewed journals [10]. Coverage includes pure elements, minerals, metals, intermetallic compounds, and ceramics, with literature coverage spanning from 1913 to the present [4] [10].

Table: ICSD Content Distribution by Compound Type

Compound Type	Number of Records	Percentage of Database
Elements	>3,000	~1.3%
Binary Compounds	>43,000	~17.9%
Ternary Compounds	>79,000	~32.9%
Quaternary & Higher	>85,000	~35.4%
Theoretical Structures	Not specified	Increasing annually

The database undergoes regular updates, with approximately 12,000 new structures added annually, ensuring researchers have access to the most current crystallographic data [2]. Each entry undergoes thorough quality checks before inclusion, maintaining the database's reputation for excellence in data curation [2] [10]. The continuous quality assurance process includes modification of existing content, supplementation of incomplete records, and removal of duplicates, ensuring even historical data maintains contemporary relevance and accuracy [2].

Core Search Capabilities

Composition-Based Searching

Composition searching represents the most fundamental approach to querying the ICSD, allowing researchers to identify crystal structures based on their chemical makeup. The system provides multiple interfaces for composition queries, including selection from a periodic table, input of specific chemical formulas, and specification of elements with oxidation states and stoichiometric indices [22]. This capability enables researchers to locate all known compounds containing specific elements or combinations thereof, facilitating the study of compositional variations and their effects on crystal structure and properties.

The composition search functionality extends beyond simple element identification to include advanced chemical formula input, supporting searches for specific stoichiometric ratios and structure types [22]. For example, researchers can search for compounds with an A₂BX₄ formula type, enabling targeted investigation of specific structural families [22]. The system also allows specification of the number of different elements occurring in a compound, providing an efficient method for narrowing searches to specific levels of compositional complexity [22].

Table: Composition Search Parameters and Capabilities

Search Parameter	Input Method	Research Application
Single/Multiple Elements	Periodic table selection	Identification of all structures containing target elements
Chemical Formula	Formula input field	Location of specific stoichiometric compounds
Oxidation States	Element with oxidation state specification	Finding compounds with specific electronic configurations
Stoichiometric Index	Numerical value input	Identification of compounds with exact composition ratios
Number of Different Elements	Integer specification	Narrowing search to binary, ternary, or quaternary systems

Mineral Name Searching

The mineral name search capability provides geologists, mineralogists, and materials scientists with direct access to naturally occurring inorganic crystal structures using their established geological nomenclature [4] [10]. This specialized search function recognizes both common mineral names and standardized mineral group classifications, bridging the gap between geological and materials science terminology. For drug development professionals, this capability is particularly valuable when investigating inorganic excipients or active ingredients derived from mineral sources, where traditional names rather than chemical formulas are commonly used in pharmaceutical literature.

The database includes comprehensive mineralogical classifications, allowing researchers to explore structurally related mineral families and identify synthetic analogs of natural minerals [10]. This functionality supports research into biomimetic materials development, where natural mineral structures serve as inspiration for synthetic compounds with enhanced pharmaceutical properties. The mineral name index is continuously updated to reflect evolving mineralogical taxonomy and the discovery of new mineral species.

Space Group Searching

Space group searching enables researchers to identify crystal structures based on their symmetry characteristics, a fundamental aspect of crystallographic analysis. The ICSD search interface provides multiple approaches to space group queries, including search by crystal system, Bravais lattice, space group symbol (both Hermann-Mauguin and Schoenflies notations), space group number, crystal class, Pearson symbol, and Laue class symbol [22]. This comprehensive symmetry-based search capability is essential for phase identification through diffraction pattern matching, crystal structure prediction, and the study of structure-property relationships governed by symmetry constraints.

For drug development applications, space group searching assists in polymorph identification and characterization, where different crystalline arrangements of the same pharmaceutical compound can significantly impact solubility, bioavailability, and stability. The ability to quickly locate known structures with specific symmetry elements streamlines the process of crystal structure determination from experimental diffraction data by providing potential structural models for refinement. Advanced search options include filtering based on the presence of inversion centers and other specific symmetry operations critical for understanding physical properties such as piezoelectricity and optical activity [22].

Table: Space Group Search Parameters in ICSD

Search Parameter	Input Options	Crystallographic Significance
Crystal System	Triclinic, Monoclinic, Orthorhombic, Tetragonal, Trigonal, Hexagonal, Cubic	Broad symmetry classification
Space Group Symbol	Hermann-Mauguin (e.g., P2₁/c), Schoenflies	Specific symmetry operations
Space Group Number	1-230	Unique identifier in International Tables for Crystallography
Bravais Lattice	P, C, I, F, R	Lattice centering types
Pearson Symbol	Format: aP12, mC16, etc.	Compact representation of crystal system and atom count
Wyckoff Sequence	Series of letters indicating site symmetries	Description of atomic positions

Search Methodology and Experimental Protocols

Database Access and Interface Navigation

Access to the full ICSD search capabilities typically requires an institutional or individual subscription through NIST or FIZ Karlsruhe [23]. The current web-based interface provides a user-friendly environment for constructing complex queries across multiple parameters. The search interface is logically organized into sections corresponding to different search criteria, with composition, mineral name, and space group representing core search categories. Researchers begin by selecting their primary search dimension, then progressively refine results using secondary parameters to narrow the result set to relevant structures.

Composition Search Protocol

The experimental protocol for composition-based searching involves specific methodological steps:

• Element Selection: Access the periodic table interface within the composition search section. Select target elements by clicking on the appropriate elements in the periodic table display. Multiple elements can be selected for complex compositions [22].

• Stoichiometry Specification: Input the desired stoichiometric ratios using the formula input field. The system supports standard chemical notation with integer and decimal coefficients. For partial composition searches, wildcard characters may be used for variable elements.

• Oxidation State Definition: Where relevant, specify oxidation states for particular elements to narrow results to compounds with specific electronic configurations. This is particularly valuable when searching for compounds with elements in specific valence states that influence material properties.

• Compound Complexity Filtering: Set parameters for the number of different elements in the target compound (e.g., binary, ternary, quaternary) to focus the search on compounds of appropriate complexity [22].

• Structure Type Identification: For advanced searches, specify known structure types (e.g., perovskite, spinel) to identify isostructural compounds with different elemental compositions.

Mineral Name Search Protocol

The methodological approach to mineral name searching requires attention to geological nomenclature:

• Mineral Name Input: Enter the complete mineral name or partial name with wildcard characters in the mineral name search field. The system recognizes both common mineral names and official International Mineralogical Association (IMA) designations.

• Mineral Group Selection: Alternatively, browse or search by mineral group classification to identify structurally related minerals. This approach is valuable for discovering alternative materials with similar structural characteristics.

• Name-Group Cross-Referencing: Combine mineral name and group searches to ensure comprehensive coverage of both specific minerals and their structural relatives.

• Geological Context Filtering: Apply filters for geological occurrence or paragenesis where available to identify minerals formed under specific conditions relevant to the research context.

Space Group Search Protocol

The experimental protocol for space group searching requires understanding of crystallographic symmetry:

• Symmetry Level Selection: Begin by selecting the appropriate crystal system (triclinic, monoclinic, orthorhombic, tetragonal, trigonal, hexagonal, or cubic) to immediately narrow the search space [22].

• Space Group Specification: Input the specific space group using either the Hermann-Mauguin symbol, Schoenflies notation, or space group number from International Tables for Crystallography.

• Lattice Type Filtering: Specify the Bravais lattice type (primitive, base-centered, body-centered, face-centered, or rhombohedral) to further refine symmetry characteristics [22].

• Wyckoff Sequence Application: For highly specific searches, input the Wyckoff sequence to identify structures with specific site symmetries and atomic position distributions [22].

• Special Symmetry Feature Selection: Include or exclude structures with specific symmetry features such as inversion centers, glide planes, or screw axes based on research requirements.

Advanced Applications and Integration

Integrated Search Strategies

Advanced research typically requires integration of multiple search dimensions to address complex materials science questions. The ICSD interface supports combined searches across composition, mineral name, and space group parameters, enabling highly specific queries such as "identify all ternary copper oxide minerals with orthorhombic symmetry" or "locate all perovskite-structured compounds containing barium and titanium." This multidimensional search capability significantly enhances research efficiency by eliminating the need for sequential filtering of large result sets.

The database's COMPARE module represents a particularly powerful tool for advanced research, enabling detection of similarities between ICSD entries and facilitating identification of isotypical structures [22]. This module incorporates automatic standardization routines based on the theory of Parthé and others, allowing meaningful comparison of crystal structures regardless of the original setting [22]. The system calculates a numerical value representing the average of all differences between coordinate triplets of corresponding atom sites, serving as a quantitative indicator of isotypism [22].

Data Analysis and Visualization Tools

Beyond basic search capabilities, ICSD provides integrated tools for data analysis and structure visualization that enhance the research workflow. The crystal visualizer (CVIS) enables three-dimensional visualization of database structures, supporting various representation models including ball-and-stick, wire, and calotte formats [22]. This tool allows continuous rotation, translation, and scaling of structures, interactive measurement of distances and angles, and statistical analysis of distance distributions between selected atoms [22].

The calculation menu within the ICSD interface enables computation of interatomic distances and bond angles directly from the crystallographic data [22]. For powder diffraction applications, the LAZY PULVERIX module simulates powder diffraction patterns from the crystal structure data, facilitating phase identification in mixed samples [22]. The STRUCTURE TIDY program provides standardization of crystal structure data according to established crystallographic conventions, enabling meaningful comparison of related structures [22].

The Researcher's Toolkit

Table: Essential Research Resources for ICSD-Based Crystallographic Research

Tool/Resource	Function	Access Method
ICSD Web Interface	Primary search interface with full functionality	Subscription-based web access [23]
RETRIEVE Software	Legacy retrieval software with search and comparison modules	CD-ROM or download [22]
Crystal Visualizer (CVIS)	3D structure visualization and manipulation	Integrated component of ICSD system [22]
COMPARE Module	Detection of structural similarities and isotypism	Integrated analysis tool [22]
STRUCTURE TIDY	Standardization of crystal structure data	Built-in standardization routine [22]
LAZY PULVERIX	Powder diffraction pattern simulation	Calculation module within ICSD [22]
ICSD API	Programmatic access for computational research	Institutional subscription with special authorization [7]

The essential search capabilities of composition, mineral name, and space group form the foundation of effective navigation through the extensive crystallographic data within the ICSD. Mastery of these search dimensions, combined with an understanding of their integrated application, enables researchers to efficiently extract meaningful structural information relevant to diverse scientific inquiries. For drug development professionals, these capabilities facilitate investigation of inorganic pharmaceutical compounds, excipient characterization, and polymorph screening. The continuous expansion and curation of the ICSD, with approximately 12,000 new structures added annually, ensures that these search capabilities remain essential tools for accessing the evolving knowledge base of inorganic crystal chemistry [2]. As materials research increasingly relies on computational approaches and data mining strategies, proficiency with these fundamental search parameters will continue to be indispensable for advancing both basic science and applied technological development.

Leveraging Theoretical Data for Synthesis Planning of Novel Materials

The discovery and synthesis of novel inorganic materials are pivotal for advancements in energy storage, catalysis, and electronics. Traditional experimental approaches are often time-consuming and resource-intensive. This whitepaper details a modern paradigm that leverages large-scale theoretical data from the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD), enhanced by machine learning and language models, to streamline and accelerate synthesis planning. We present a technical framework that integrates computational data mining with predictive modeling, providing researchers with methodologies to predict promising chemical systems and optimize synthesis conditions such as precursor selection and thermal treatment parameters.

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) serves as a critical repository of crystallographic information, providing the foundational data for modern materials informatics. Maintained by FIZ Karlsruhe and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the ICSD is the world's largest database of fully determined inorganic crystal structures, containing over 327,000 entries as of 2025 [24]. This vast collection of curated data, which includes structures derived from both experimental refinement and theoretical prediction, enables the mining of structural trends and chemical relationships that are essential for planning the synthesis of novel materials [25].

The core challenge in inorganic synthesis lies in moving from a target composition or structure to a viable experimental protocol. This process has historically relied on expert knowledge and heuristic approaches. The integration of theoretical data from the ICSD with powerful new computational models now provides a systematic, data-driven pathway to de-risk and guide experimental efforts. By treating synthesis planning as a data-augmented prediction task, researchers can identify feasible reaction pathways and conditions with significantly higher efficiency [26].

The ICSD provides a comprehensive and growing resource for materials research. The table below summarizes its key quantitative metrics, which underscore its utility for large-scale data mining and model training.

Table 1: Key Metrics of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD)

Metric	Description	Value (as of 2025)
Total Entries	Number of crystal structures in the database	327,833 [24]
Temporal Coverage	Literature coverage period	1913 to present [25]
Data Types	Categories of included structures	Experimental refinements, iso-structural types, theoretically predicted structures, and partially characterized structures [25]
Accessibility	Primary access points	Web application (Version 5.5.0) [24]

This extensive database allows researchers to query systems based on chemistry, unit cell parameters, space group, and other derived crystallographic properties, forming the basis for predictive analysis [25].

A Computational Framework for Data-Augmented Synthesis Planning

A transformative approach in modern materials science involves using language models (LMs) to recall and predict synthesis information from vast text corpora of scientific literature. Recent research demonstrates that off-the-shelf models such as GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Llama 4 Maverick can achieve a Top-1 accuracy of up to 53.8% for precursor prediction and a Top-5 accuracy of 66.1% on a held-out set of 1,000 reactions. Furthermore, these models can predict calcination and sintering temperatures with a mean absolute error (MAE) below 126 °C, a performance competitive with specialized regression methods [26].

This capability enables a hybrid workflow where language models are employed to generate a large number of synthetic reaction recipes, which are then used to pre-train a specialized transformer-based model. One such model, SyntMTE, fine-tuned on a combination of LM-generated and literature-mined data, has demonstrated a significant improvement in predictive accuracy, reducing the MAE for sintering temperature prediction to 73 °C and for calcination temperature to 98 °C. This represents an improvement of up to 8.7% over baseline models trained solely on experimental data [26]. The following diagram illustrates this integrated workflow.

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Protocol: Ensemble Language Model for Precursor and Temperature Prediction

This protocol outlines the use of an ensemble of general-purpose language models to predict synthesis parameters, balancing accuracy and computational cost [26].

• Model Selection and Prompting: Select multiple off-the-shelf language models (e.g., GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.0 Flash). Design precise prompts that include the target material's composition and request a list of likely precursor compounds or a specific calcination/sintering temperature in degrees Celsius.
• Inference and Aggregation: Execute the prompts across all selected models. For precursor prediction, aggregate the results to determine the most frequently suggested precursors (Top-1 and Top-5). For temperature prediction, calculate the mean or median of the numerical values returned by the different models.
• Ensemble Refinement: The ensemble approach not only enhances predictive accuracy but can also reduce the inference cost per prediction by up to 70% compared to relying on a single, largest model [26].

Protocol: Fine-Tuning a Specialized Transformer Model (SyntMTE)

For higher accuracy and domain-specific performance, fine-tuning a dedicated model on a large corpus of synthesis data is recommended. The following diagram details the model architecture and training process.

The fine-tuning procedure is as follows:

• Data Curation and Pre-training: Combine a large set of language model-generated synthetic reaction recipes (e.g., 28,548 recipes) with examples mined from the scientific literature. Use this combined dataset to pre-train a transformer-based model, initializing it with general chemical knowledge.
• Task-Specific Fine-Tuning: Further train the pre-trained model on a smaller, high-quality dataset where the target variables are known (e.g., confirmed precursor sets, accurately measured sintering temperatures). This step adapts the model to the specific nuances of inorganic synthesis planning.
• Validation and Case Study: Validate the model's performance (SyntMTE) on a held-out test set. Subsequently, apply it to a real-world case study, such as predicting the dopant-dependent sintering trends for Li~7~La~3~Zr~2~O~12~ solid-state electrolytes, to confirm it reproduces experimentally observed phenomena [26].

Statistical Validation of Synthesis Predictions

Robust statistical analysis is required to validate the performance of predictive models in synthesis planning. When comparing predicted synthesis parameters (e.g., temperatures) across multiple material groups or model types, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is an appropriate method. ANOVA is used to test the hypothesis that the means of three or more groups are equal, helping to determine if observed differences in predictions are statistically significant [27].

The core idea of ANOVA is to partition the total variability in the data into "variability between group means" and "variability within groups." A significant result indicates that not all group means are equal, warranting further investigation into specific differences [27]. The assumptions for ANOVA must be checked:

• Independence: Predictions and measurements must be independent across different material systems.
• Normality: The distribution of residuals (errors) should be approximately normal.
• Equal Variances: The variance of prediction errors should be similar across different groups of materials.

The implementation of the described framework relies on a combination of data, software, and computational resources. The following table details the key components of the modern computational materials scientist's toolkit.

Table 2: Essential Resources for Data-Augmented Synthesis Planning

Resource / Tool	Type	Function in Synthesis Planning
ICSD Database	Data Repository	Provides the foundational crystal structure data for identifying structural trends and populating model training sets [24] [25].
General-Purpose Language Models (e.g., GPT-4.1)	Computational Model	Recalls synthesis conditions from learned literature and predicts precursors and reaction parameters without task-specific fine-tuning [26].
SyntMTE / Custom Transformers	Specialized Software Model	A fine-tuned model that achieves higher accuracy in predicting specific synthesis parameters like sintering and calcination temperatures [26].
Statistical Software (e.g., R)	Analysis Tool	Used to perform statistical validation of model predictions, including ANOVA to compare results across multiple material groups [27].
Vocabulary & Terminology Server	Knowledge Base	Provides standardized medical/vocabulary terms; analogous systems in materials science ensure consistent naming of compounds and properties, enabling data reuse and cross-site collaboration [28].

The integration of theoretical data from the ICSD with advanced machine learning models marks a significant shift in inorganic materials synthesis. The methodologies outlined—from using ensemble language models to fine-tuning specialized transformers—provide a scalable and data-efficient framework that moves beyond heuristic approaches. The demonstrated ability to predict synthesis conditions with high accuracy and to reproduce complex experimental trends, as in the case of Li~7~La~3~Zr~2~O~12~, validates the power of this hybrid, data-augmented strategy.

Future developments will likely focus on creating more integrated and automated platforms that seamlessly combine database querying, predictive modeling, and results validation. Furthermore, the expansion of databases and the continued refinement of AI models will further close the loop between theoretical prediction and experimental realization, dramatically accelerating the design and synthesis of next-generation functional materials.

Within the field of inorganic crystallography, the synergy between structural visualization and analytical simulation forms the cornerstone of modern materials research. This technical guide delves into two advanced functionalities central to exploiting the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD): the systematic analysis of coordination polyhedra and the simulation of powder diffraction patterns. The ICSD, the world's largest database for completely determined inorganic crystal structures, provides an indispensable repository of curated data, including atomic coordinates and structural descriptors essential for these tasks [1]. For researchers and drug development professionals, mastering these techniques is paramount for predicting material properties, guiding synthesis, and elucidating structural-property relationships. This document, framed within a broader thesis on ICSD research, provides a detailed methodological framework for implementing these advanced techniques, complete with quantitative data, experimental protocols, and essential toolkits.

Coordination Polyhedra in Structural Analysis

Theoretical Foundation and ICSD Classification

A coordination polyhedron describes the geometric arrangement of ligands directly bonded to a central atom or ion [29]. The spatial arrangement, or secondary valency according to Werner's theory, is directional and determines the molecule's geometry [29]. In the ICSD, coordination polyhedra are key descriptors for classifying structure types and understanding atomic environments (AE) [30].

The ICSD employs a standardized notation system where the coordination number is followed by a letter indicating the polyhedron's geometry. This information is specifically cataloged for all structure type prototypes within the database [30]. The following table summarizes the most frequently encountered coordination polyhedra in inorganic structures, as classified in the ICSD.

Table 1: Common Coordination Polyhedra and Their ICSD Notations

Coordination Number	Polyhedron Symbol	Geometric Shape	Common Examples
4	4t	Tetrahedron	[Ni(CO)₄] [29]
4	4sp	Square Planar	[Ni(CN)₄]²⁻ [29]
5	5tbp	Trigonal Bipyramidal	[Fe(CO)₅] [29]
6	6o	Octahedron	[PtCl₆]²⁻ [29]
8	8cb	Cube	Found in some ionic structures [30]
12	12co	Cuboctahedron	Oxygen in spinel structures [30]
12	12i	Icosahedron	Common in metal structures [30]

The geometry adopted by a central atom is primarily governed by its coordination number, which is influenced by the relative sizes of the metal ion and the ligands, as well as electronic factors such as charge and electron configuration [29]. It is critical to note that while a coordination number suggests a primary geometry, complexes can exhibit a variety of geometric isomers [29].

Methodology for Polyhedral Identification and Analysis

Protocol 1: Identifying Coordination Polyhedra using the ICSD

• Database Access and Search Initiation: Access the ICSD via its web or desktop interface [31]. Navigate to the "Advanced Search" functionality, typically found under the "Experimental Information" section [30].
• Query Formulation for Atomic Environments: Use the dedicated search field for Atomic Environment (AE). The ICSD does not employ automatic truncation; therefore, queries must be exact. To search for all structures featuring octahedrally coordinated aluminum, the query would be AE* *Al6o*. To find all occurrences of a specific polyhedron, such as a cuboctahedron, use a wildcard pattern like AE* *12co* [30].
• Result Analysis and Structural Validation: The search will return a list of crystal structures matching the criteria. For each entry, inspect the associated comment or "AE" field to confirm the coordination polyhedron. It is important to remember that a coordination found in a prototype will also appear in all members belonging to that structure type [30].
• Structure Visualization and Verification: Import the crystal structure data into a visualization program such as VESTA or Mercury [31]. These tools allow for the graphical identification and inspection of coordination polyhedra around selected atoms, providing a direct visual confirmation of the geometry inferred from the database query.

The logical workflow for this analysis, from database query to final validation, is outlined below.

Powder Diffraction Pattern Simulation

Principles and Applications in Research

Powder diffraction pattern simulation is a critical computational technique for comparing experimental data with known or proposed structural models. It plays a vital role in phase identification, structure refinement (e.g., Rietveld method), and predicting the diffraction behavior of materials. Within the context of ICSD research, simulating patterns from database entries allows researchers to create reference patterns for unknown phase analysis and to complete crystal structures where initial models from techniques like powder diffraction provide well-located heavy atoms but unreliable light-atom positions [32].

Methodology for Pattern Simulation from ICSD Data

Protocol 2: Simulating Powder Patterns from ICSD Crystallographic Information Files (CIFs)

• Data Acquisition: Perform a search in the ICSD for the target compound or structure type. Download the Crystallographic Information File (CIF) for the selected entry. This file contains all necessary structural parameters, including unit cell dimensions, space group, and atomic coordinates [1].
• Software Selection and Data Import: Utilize specialized crystallographic software capable of calculating theoretical powder diffraction patterns from CIF data. Recommended programs include:
  • VESTA: A comprehensive 3D visualization program that can also calculate and visualize powder diffraction patterns [31].
  • Mercury: Provided by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), it offers robust simulation capabilities [31].
  • Full-Profit Suite (e.g., POWDER CELL): Software packages specifically designed for powder diffraction analysis and simulation.
• Simulation Parameter Definition: Within the software, define the critical experimental parameters for the simulation:
  • Radiation Wavelength: Specify the X-ray wavelength (e.g., Cu-Kα = 1.54056 Å or Mo-Kα = 0.71073 Å).
  • Diffraction Geometry: Select the appropriate geometry (e.g., Bragg-Brentano).
  • Angular Range (2θ): Set the start, stop, and step size for the calculation (e.g., 5° to 80° with a 0.02° step).
  • Peak Profile Function: Choose a function to model peak shape (e.g., Gaussian, Lorentzian, or Pseudo-Voigt).
  • Instrumental Broadening: Input parameters to account for the instrumental contribution to peak width.
• Pattern Calculation and Output: Execute the calculation. The software will generate a theoretical diffractogram containing intensity versus diffraction angle (2θ) data.
• Validation and Comparison: Compare the simulated pattern with experimental data. A good agreement between the positions and relative intensities of the peaks confirms the identity of the phase. For structure completion tasks, the agreement is assessed by criteria based on the fit between the whole experimental diffraction pattern and the calculated one, often employing procedures like Monte Carlo methods to locate missing atoms under the restraints of the experimental model [32].

The comprehensive workflow for powder pattern simulation, from data sourcing to final analysis, is visualized in the following diagram.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Software

Successful implementation of the methodologies described above relies on a suite of specialized software tools and databases. The following table details the key components of the modern crystallographer's toolkit.

Table 2: Essential Software and Databases for Coordination Analysis and Pattern Simulation

Tool Name	Type	Primary Function	Relevance to This Field
ICSD [1] [31]	Database	The world's largest database for inorganic crystal structures.	The primary source for reliable crystallographic data (CIFs) for both coordination polyhedron studies and as input for pattern simulation.
VESTA [31]	Software / 3D Visualization	Visualizes structural models and creates polyhedral plots; can also calculate powder patterns.	Essential for visualizing coordination polyhedra and for simulating powder diffraction patterns from structural models.
Mercury [31]	Software / 3D Visualization	A user-friendly program for crystal structure visualization from the CCDC.	Used for interactive exploration of coordination environments and for generating high-quality graphics for publications.
ShelXL-2025 [31]	Software / Structure Refinement	The standard program for crystal structure refinement.	Used for the final stages of structure determination and refinement, which may be informed by coordination polyhedron analysis.
EXPO [32]	Software / Structure Solution	A suite for solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data.	Incorporates advanced procedures (e.g., Monte Carlo) for completing structures by locating light atoms using coordination polyhedron restraints.
PLATON [31]	Software / Analysis Toolbox	A multifunctional crystallographic toolbox for validation and analysis.	Used to check for missed symmetry, validate structures, and perform various geometric calculations.
OLEX [31]	Software / Graphical Interface	A graphical user interface for the ShelX suite of programs.	Streamlines the structure refinement process, making it more accessible, especially for novice users.

The exploration and development of advanced battery materials represent a critical frontier in the pursuit of next-generation energy storage technologies. Within this research landscape, the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) serves as an indispensable resource for materials scientists and engineers. As the world's largest database for completely identified inorganic crystal structures, the ICSD provides researchers with curated structural data essential for understanding material properties and performance characteristics [2] [13]. This case study examines how standardized keyword frameworks within the ICSD and complementary databases can accelerate the discovery and optimization of battery materials, with particular emphasis on emerging solid-state and zinc-based battery systems.

The value of these databases lies not only in their extensive collections—the ICSD alone contains more than 240,000 crystal structures with records dating back to 1913—but also in their systematic organization of critical material descriptors [13]. These include unit cell parameters, space group classifications, Wyckoff sequences, atomic coordinates, and specialized keywords describing physical and chemical properties [2]. For battery researchers, this structured information enables sophisticated data mining approaches that can identify promising candidate materials, predict their electrochemical behavior, and guide experimental validation efforts.

Database Fundamentals for Battery Research

Several specialized databases provide the foundational data necessary for computational materials discovery in battery research. The table below summarizes the key repositories relevant to battery materials researchers.

Table 1: Key Databases for Battery Material Research

Database Name	Primary Content	Entry Count	Key Features for Battery Research
ICSD (Inorganic Crystal Structure Database)	Inorganic crystal structures	>240,000	Prototype assignments, structural descriptors (Wyckoff, Pearson), quality-indexed data [2] [13]
HTEM (High Throughput Experimental Materials)	Experimental thin-film materials data	140,000+	Synthesis conditions, structural/optoelectronic properties, combinatorial libraries [33]
AtomWork	Inorganic material properties	82,000 crystal structures, 55,000 properties	Phase diagrams, property data, structure-prototype relationships [34]

Standardized Keyword Frameworks

The ICSD employs several sophisticated classification systems that enable precise searching and categorization of battery-relevant materials. The ANX formula system classifies compounds based on their chemical stoichiometry and bonding characteristics, particularly useful for identifying structural analogs [13]. The Wyckoff sequence provides a compact notation for complete crystal structure description, enabling rapid structural comparisons across different material systems [2]. Additionally, the database assigns materials to approximately 9,000 distinct structure types, allowing researchers to quickly identify all compounds sharing a common structural motif regardless of their specific chemical composition [2].

These standardized classification systems allow researchers to transcend simple elemental searches and instead query materials based on structural characteristics directly relevant to electrochemical performance. For instance, a researcher could identify all materials with a spinel structure type (e.g., LiMn₂O₄) or all compounds exhibiting tunnel structures suitable for ion insertion.

Battery Materials Landscape

Emerging Battery Technologies

The search for improved battery technologies has led to several promising material systems, each with distinct advantages and challenges. Solid-state batteries represent one of the most significant frontiers, replacing flammable liquid electrolytes with solid alternatives to improve safety and enable higher energy densities [35]. Recent breakthroughs include the development of "special glue" iodine ions that improve interface bonding, flexible polymer electrolytes that withstand 20,000 bending cycles, and fluorinated polyether coatings that enhance thermal stability up to 120°C [35]. These developments potentially enable electric vehicle ranges exceeding 1,000 km on a single charge [35].

Zinc-based batteries offer an alternative pathway with advantages for grid-scale storage, including inherent safety, lower cost, and environmental benignity [36]. These systems utilize both alkaline and mildly acidic electrolytes, with recent research focusing on improving Zn cycling efficiency and developing host materials for Zn²⁺ storage [36].

Table 2: Emerging Battery Technologies and Material Requirements

Battery Technology	Key Material Components	Performance Targets	Research Challenges
All-Solid-State Lithium Metal	Solid electrolytes (sulfide, polymer, oxide), lithium-rich manganese cathodes [37]	400-600 Wh/kg energy density [37], >1000 km EV range [35]	Interface resistance, dendrite formation, manufacturing scalability [38]
Zinc-Ion Batteries	Zn metal anodes, MnO₂ and other host materials, aqueous electrolytes [36]	Long cycle life, low cost, high safety	Zn dendrite formation, reversible cycling efficiency, reaction mechanism complexity [36]
Solid-State Polymer Systems	In-situ polymerized electrolytes, silicon anodes, high-voltage cathodes [38]	Flexibility, safety, 300+ Wh/kg energy density [37]	Low temperature performance, interface stability, ionic conductivity [38]

Commercialization Timeline

The solid-state battery industry is undergoing rapid transformation, with projections indicating a market value of US$9 billion by 2035 [38]. Major automotive manufacturers including Toyota, Chery, and Volkswagen have announced ambitious development timelines, with pilot operations expected as early as 2026 and broader market launches targeted for 2027-2028 [35] [37]. Chinese manufacturers like CATL and BYD plan to introduce solid-state batteries around 2027, with mass production following toward the end of the decade [35].

Experimental Methodologies

Database Mining Workflow

The process of identifying promising battery materials through database mining follows a systematic workflow that integrates computational screening with experimental validation.

Electrochemical Characterization Protocols

Comprehensive electrochemical characterization is essential for validating candidate battery materials identified through database mining. The following protocols represent standard methodologies in the field:

Cyclic Voltammetry (CV)

Purpose: Determine electrochemical activity, redox potentials, and reaction reversibility. Methodology: Apply a linear voltage sweep to the working electrode while measuring current response. For solid-state battery materials, typical parameters include scan rates of 0.1-1.0 mV/s over voltage ranges specific to the material system (e.g., 1.5-4.5 V for lithium-ion cathodes) [39]. The resulting voltammograms reveal oxidation and reduction peaks corresponding to electrochemical reactions.

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

Purpose: Quantify ionic conductivity, interface resistance, and charge transfer processes. Methodology: Apply a small AC voltage amplitude (5-10 mV) across a frequency range from 100 kHz to 10 mHz [39]. For solid electrolyte screening, symmetric cells (e.g., Au|electrolyte|Au) enable separation of bulk and grain boundary resistance. The resulting Nyquist plots are fitted with equivalent circuit models to extract specific resistance values.

Galvanostatic Cycling with Potential Limitation (GCPL)

Purpose: Evaluate specific capacity, cycling stability, and rate capability. Methodology: Apply constant current charge/discharge cycles between predetermined voltage limits. For full cell testing, typical C-rates range from 0.1C (formation cycles) to 5C (rate capability testing). Specific energy calculations follow the equation: Specific Energy (Wh/g) = Average Voltage (V) × Specific Capacity (Ah/g) [39].

The Scientist's Toolkit

Research Reagent Solutions

The experimental investigation of battery materials requires specialized reagents and components designed to probe specific electrochemical properties.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Battery Material Investigation

Reagent/Category	Function	Example Materials	Application Notes
Solid Electrolytes	Ion conduction between electrodes	Sulfides (Li₁₀GeP₂S₁₂), Oxides (LLZO), Polymers (PEO)	Sulfides offer high conductivity but toxicity challenges; oxides provide stability but high interface resistance [38]
Ionic Additives	Interface modification, ion transport enhancement	Iodine ions, fluorinated polyether materials	Iodine ions act as "traffic cops" at electrode-electrolyte interfaces; fluorinated materials create protective "shields" [35]
Polymer Matrix Components	Provide mechanical flexibility, host for ionic conduction	Polymer "skeletons," in-situ polymerized electrolytes	Must withstand repeated bending (20,000+ cycles) while maintaining ionic pathways [35]
High-Energy Cathodes	Lithium storage, potential determination	Lithium-rich manganese oxides, high-nickel NMC	Provide high capacity but often face stability challenges; structural insights from ICSD guide stabilization strategies [37]
Anode Materials	Lithium hosting, electron conduction	Lithium metal, silicon-carbon composites, zinc	Lithium metal offers high capacity but dendrite challenges; silicon provides high capacity but volume expansion issues [38]

Computational and Characterization Tools

Beyond chemical reagents, battery materials research relies on sophisticated computational and characterization tools:

High-Throughput Experimentation Systems: Combinatorial physical vapor deposition (PVD) systems enable rapid synthesis of sample libraries with composition spreads, dramatically accelerating materials optimization [33]. These systems are integrated with characterization tools that automatically measure structural, chemical, and optoelectronic properties.

Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS): Custom data management platforms automatically harvest synthesis and characterization data into structured databases, enabling machine learning approaches [33]. These systems employ extract-transform-load (ETL) processes to align heterogeneous data types into searchable formats.

Powder Diffraction Simulation: Database-integrated tools simulate X-ray diffraction patterns from crystal structure data, enabling rapid phase identification during experimental validation [2] [34].

The integration of standardized keyword frameworks within inorganic crystal structure databases has transformed the paradigm of battery materials research. By enabling systematic mining of structural-property relationships across hundreds of thousands of compounds, these databases dramatically accelerate the identification and optimization of materials for next-generation energy storage. The continued expansion of database content—particularly the inclusion of synthesis parameters and electrochemical performance metrics—will further enhance their predictive power. As solid-state and alternative battery technologies progress toward commercialization, the role of structured materials informatics will become increasingly central to research and development efforts. Future developments in machine learning and artificial intelligence will likely leverage these curated datasets to enable predictive materials design, potentially unlocking new material systems beyond the scope of current empirical approaches.

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) represent two pillars of crystallographic data, serving complementary roles in materials science and drug development research. The ICSD is the world's largest database for completely identified inorganic crystal structures, managed by FIZ Karlsruhe, with its first records dating back to 1913 [2]. It contains over 240,000 inorganic crystal structures that have passed thorough quality checks [10]. The CSD, curated by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), primarily focuses on organic and metal-organic structures. The strategic integration of these resources addresses a critical need in interdisciplinary research areas such as battery and solar cell development, where researchers previously needed to check multiple separate sources [40].

For researchers and drug development professionals, this integration enables more robust structural analysis pipelines. It facilitates the early identification of novel compounds, helps avoid time-consuming redeterminations of known structures, and assists in detecting whether starting materials or reaction by-products have crystallized by accident [40]. This technical guide explores the methodologies, tools, and protocols for effectively leveraging these interconnected resources within research workflows, framed within the broader context of ICSD research.

Database Fundamentals and Comparative Analysis

Understanding the distinct characteristics and overlapping capabilities of the ICSD and CSD is fundamental to their effective integration. The table below summarizes the core attributes of each database and a newer integrated platform.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Crystal Structure Databases

Feature	ICSD (Inorganic Crystal Structure Database)	CSD (Cambridge Structural Database)	Crystal Structure Database (csd-web.ru)
Primary Focus	Inorganic crystal structures [2]	Organic and metal-organic compounds [41]	Unified web platform for both organic and inorganic structures [42]
Content Size	>240,000 structures (2021) [10]	Part of over 2 million structures in unified platforms [42]	Over 2 million structures total [42]
Key Features	Excellent quality data, extensive checking, structure types, theoretical structures [2] [10]	World's primary repository for small-molecule organic and metal-organic structures	Fast search algorithms, generation of diffraction patterns, non-commercial [42]
Integration Value	Provides inorganic data for cross-disciplinary analysis [40]	Provides organic/metal-organic data for comprehensive checking [40]	Demonstrates the trend towards unified access

The ICSD is particularly distinguished by its content, which includes structural data of pure elements, minerals, metals, and intermetallic compounds [10]. Approximately 80% of its structures are allocated to about 9,000 structure types, enabling powerful searches for substance classes [2]. A significant feature for modern materials research is its continuous selection and evaluation of theoretical structures, which can serve as a basis for developing new materials through data mining processes [2].

Integrated Methodologies and Tools

CellCheckCSD: Automated Reduced Cell Checking

The primary technical tool for integrating ICSD and CSD in analytical workflows is CellCheckCSD, a freely available, command-line tool for performing crystal structure reduced cell checks against both databases [40]. This tool is designed for use during data collection to prevent redundant research efforts.

Table 2: CellCheckCSD Application in Research Workflows

Application Scenario	Protocol	Research Impact
Matching Known Structures	Check pre-experiment unit cell against CSD/ICSD to match cell dimensions against published structures [40].	Confirms compound identity without full structure determination, saving significant time and resources.
Novelty Verification	Check that a new crystal sample has not been published before full data set collection [40].	Prevents unnecessary publication delays and ensures research novelty early in the experimental process.
By-product Identification	Check whether starting materials or reaction by-products have crystallized accidentally [40].	Helps troubleshoot unexpected crystallization results and confirms the target compound was obtained.

CellCheckCSD has been incorporated into major software ecosystems, including the Rigaku software package CrysAlisPro and the Bruker software suite APEX, making it accessible within established research workflows [40]. It is also integrated into International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) journal workflows and appears as an optional check in the checkCIF structural validation tool [40].

Joint Deposition Services

Beyond analysis, integration extends to data deposition through a joint web-based CIF deposition and validation service operated by CCDC and FIZ Karlsruhe [41]. This unified portal accepts depositions for both the CSD and ICSD, simplifying the process for researchers working with hybrid materials. The deposition service accommodates two primary pathways:

• Data for Publication in a Scientific Journal: Researchers are encouraged to deposit data prior to publication and include the deposition number in their manuscript [41].
• Database Communications: For structures not intended for journal publication, researchers can directly publish through the database as a CSD Communication or ICSD Communication, making the data available to the scientific community [41].

The technical protocol strongly encourages the inclusion of structure factor data with CIFs for deposition, aligning with IUCr recommendations [41]. Upon receipt, all depositions are stored in a secure archive, with the depositor receiving a confirmation email and deposition number within three working days [41].

Experimental Protocols and Workflows

Protocol for Structural Novelty Assessment

Objective: To determine whether a newly crystallized compound represents a novel structure or has been previously reported, using integrated ICSD/CSD checking.

Materials and Reagents:

• Crystalline Sample: Single crystal suitable for X-ray diffraction.
• Diffractometer: X-ray, neutron, or electron diffraction instrument.
• Software: CrysAlisPro or APEX software with CellCheckCSD integration [40].
• Database Access: Valid subscriptions or institutional access to ICSD and CSD databases.

Methodology:

• Mount the crystal on the diffractometer and perform initial unit cell determination.
• Execute CellCheckCSD through the integrated software interface prior to full data collection.
• Analyze the report for matches based on reduced cell parameters.
• For matches: Review the proposed structures to confirm identity based on chemical composition and symmetry.
• For no matches: Proceed with full data collection and structure determination, concluding likely novelty.
• Deposit the novel structure using the joint deposition service to contribute to the research community [41].

Integrated Database Search Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for conducting a comprehensive structural analysis using integrated databases, a common requirement in research environments.

Diagram 1: Structural Analysis Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Effective integration of ICSD and CSD requires both software tools and conceptual frameworks. The following table details key resources and their functions in the structural analysis workflow.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Tools for Integrated Structural Analysis

Tool/Resource	Function in Workflow	Technical Specification
CellCheckCSD	Command-line tool for reduced cell checking against ICSD and CSD during data collection [40].	Freely available after registration; integrates with CrysAlisPro and APEX software [40].
Joint CIF Deposition Service	Web-based portal for depositing structural data to both CSD and ICSD [41].	Accepts .cif format from X-ray, neutron, and electron diffraction studies [41].
ICSD Database	Provides reference data for completely identified inorganic crystal structures [2] [10].	Contains over 240,000 structures; requires subscription access [10] [23].
Structure Factor Data	Critical supplementary data for deposition, enabling more comprehensive validation [41].	Follows IUCr recommendations; should be included with CIF deposition [41].
CrysAlisPro/APEX Software	Commercial diffraction software suites with integrated CellCheckCSD functionality [40].	Standard platforms for crystallographic data collection and processing.

The integration between ICSD and CSD represents a significant advancement in crystallographic research infrastructure, moving from isolated databases toward interconnected knowledge systems. This evolution is driven by the needs of interdisciplinary research, where the boundaries between inorganic, metal-organic, and organic chemistry are increasingly blurred in fields like pharmaceutical development and materials science [40]. The development of tools like CellCheckCSD and unified deposition services demonstrates a commitment to reducing administrative burdens on scientists while enhancing research quality.

Future developments will likely focus on even tighter integration, potentially incorporating predictive analytics and machine learning across the combined dataset. The existence of platforms like the non-commercial Crystal Structure Database, which already provides unified searches across millions of structures from CCDC, ICSD, and other sources, indicates a clear trend toward comprehensive structural informatics [42]. For researchers and drug development professionals, mastering these integrated workflows is no longer optional but essential for conducting efficient, novel, and high-impact structural research. The protocols and methodologies outlined in this technical guide provide a foundation for leveraging these powerful integrated resources to advance scientific discovery.

Navigating Data Deposition and Common Challenges in the ICSD

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) stands as a critical pillar in the field of materials research, serving as the world's largest repository for completely identified inorganic crystal structures [2] [10]. For researchers contributing to this authoritative resource, a thorough understanding of the deposition prerequisites—including account creation and precise file preparation—is fundamental. This guide provides an in-depth examination of these technical requirements, framed within the broader context of advancing crystallographic data management and supporting the reproducibility of scientific findings in inorganic chemistry and materials science. Proper deposition ensures that valuable structural data transitions seamlessly from individual research projects into the scientific community's shared knowledge base, where it can fuel further discovery and innovation.

Core Prerequisites for ICSD Deposition

Before initiating a deposition, researchers must ensure they meet two foundational requirements: a valid user account and a complete set of data files. These elements are essential for accessing the deposition system and successfully submitting the scientific data.

Account Creation

Depositing data into the ICSD is facilitated through a collaborative service managed by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) and FIZ Karlsruhe [43] [44]. Therefore, the first step is not to create an account directly with ICSD, but with the CCDC Deposition Service.

• Registration Process: Researchers must register for an account on the CCDC website. This account is created free of charge and serves as the gateway for the unified deposition process [45] [43].
• Unified Portal: This single account allows researchers to deposit crystal structures across chemical domains, including organic, metal-organic, and inorganic compounds, via the joint CCDC/FIZ Access Structures Service [43] [44].

Required Files for Deposition

A complete deposition requires three primary files that together document the experiment and its results. The table below summarizes these mandatory files.

Table 1: Essential Files for Crystal Structure Deposition

File Extension	Content and Purpose	How the File is Typically Generated
.cif (Crystallographic Information File)	The primary data file containing all key structural parameters, refinement details, and bibliographic information [45].	Output directly by the structure refinement software (e.g., SHELXL) [45].
.hkl	Contains the reflection data (structure factor amplitudes) from the diffraction experiment [45].	Generated by the diffractometer during data integration and subsequently corrected for absorption [45].
.fcf	Contains the structure factor calculations based on the refined model, used for validation [45].	Generated by the structure refinement software alongside the .cif file [45].

Preparation and Validation of Data Files

Ensuring the correctness and completeness of the .cif file is a critical step preceding deposition. This file undergoes rigorous automated checks, and any errors can delay the process.

cif File Content and Checking

The .cif file acts as the core data container. It must be meticulously prepared and validated using specialized tools.

• Use of EnCIFer Software: It is highly recommended to use the EnCIFer software, provided free of charge by the CCDC, to check and edit the .cif file [45]. EnCIFer understands the .cif nomenclature and provides immediate feedback on errors or invalid entries, which might be overlooked in a standard text editor.
• Critical Data Entries: The following table outlines key entries within the .cif file that require careful attention and verification.

Table 2: Critical .cif File Entries Requiring Verification

Data Entry	Description	Example/Format
_chemical_formula_sum	Sum formula with elements alphabetically sorted.	CaCO3
_symmetry_space_group_name_H-M	Space group in Hermann-Mauguin notation.	P 1 21/c 1
_cell_length_a, _b, _c, _angle_alpha, _beta, _gamma	Unit cell parameters.	All must be reported regardless of crystal symmetry.
_exptl_crystal_description	Crystal habit or morphology.	block, needle, plate
_exptl_crystal_size_max, _mid, _min	Crystal dimensions in millimeters.	Determined from microscopy.
_exptl_absorpt_correction_type	Method of absorption correction.	numerical, multi-scan
_computing_structure_solution	Software used for structure solution.	'SHELXT-2018 (Sheldrick, 2018)'

• Validation Workflow: After loading the .cif into EnCIFer, the built-in validator (a yellow warning triangle icon) should be executed. An ideal validation result will show "Errors – none", "Warnings – none", and "Remarks – none" [45]. This step is crucial for identifying and rectifying issues, such as an incorrectly specified space group.

Pre-Deposition Check with checkCIF

During the online deposition process, depositors are advised to select the option to "run the IUCr checkCIF/PLATON service" [45]. This service performs an additional, powerful check on the data.

• It searches for potential issues like overlooked symmetry, and checks for other inconsistencies in the .cif file.
• The service generates a report with "Alert Levels." Level A and B alerts typically indicate serious problems that must be addressed, while Level C alerts may be less critical (e.g., the measurement temperature) and can often be acknowledged without further action [45].

The Deposition Workflow and Final Inclusion in ICSD

The deposition process involves a structured online sequence, followed by a crucial final step to ensure the data is incorporated into the ICSD.

Online Deposition via CCDC Assistant

The following diagram illustrates the complete deposition and inclusion pathway, from file preparation to final appearance in the ICSD.

Diagram 1: ICSD Deposition and Inclusion Workflow

• File Upload: After logging into the CCDC deposition service, the validated .cif, .hkl, and .fcf files are uploaded [45].
• Publication Information: At this stage, if the structure is associated with a published article, the journal and citation details can be linked. If the deposition occurs prior to publication, author names and address details are entered temporarily, and the full publication information can be added later [45].
• Data Enhancement and Submission: The assistant allows depositors to add cataloguing information, such as material properties (e.g., "luminescent") or synthesis methods (e.g., "from the melt"), to enhance the discoverability of the dataset [45]. Upon final submission, an automatic email confirmation is sent containing the CSD deposition number (e.g., CSD-XXXX) [45] [44].

The Critical Final Step: Inclusion in ICSD

A pivotal, non-automated step is required to ensure the deposited structure is incorporated into the ICSD itself.

• Manual Notification to FIZ Karlsruhe: After the associated paper is published, the researcher must manually send an email from the address linked to their CCDC account to CrysDATA@fiz-karlsruhe.de [45].
• Email Requirements: This email must include the CSD number and a PDF of the final published paper (complete with page numbers, not a proof) [45].
• Rationale: This step is necessary due to a communication gap between the CCDC and FIZ Karlsruhe; the FIZ does not automatically receive publication notifications from the CCDC. Without this final email, the structure will remain in the CCDC's system but will not be transferred into the ICSD [45].

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 3: Essential Resources for ICSD Deposition

Tool or Resource	Function in the Deposition Process	Access Information
CCDC Deposition Account	Provides access to the online deposition portal for submitting crystal structures.	Free registration on the CCDC website [45] [43].
EnCIFer Software	A specialized editor for validating and correcting .cif files, ensuring they meet formal standards.	Free download from the CCDC [45].
checkCIF/PLATON Service	An online validation service that performs advanced checks for crystallographic consistency and errors.	Integrated into the CCDC online deposition assistant [45].
Joint CCDC/FIZ Access	The open-access service where deposited structures are stored and assigned a DOI for citation.	Freely accessible online [43] [44].

The deposition of crystal structures into the ICSD is a structured process that demands careful attention to technical detail. Success hinges on two equally important pillars: the preparation of a complete and validated dataset (.cif, .hkl, .fcf), and the correct execution of a multi-step deposition and notification protocol. Mastery of this process, particularly the often-overlooked final step of notifying FIZ Karlsruhe, ensures that valuable research data is permanently integrated into one of the foundational resources of materials science. This contributes to the cumulative progress of scientific knowledge, enabling data-driven discoveries for years to come.

I searched for a step-by-step guide for the "CCDC Online Deposition Assistant" but could not find one. The search results indicate that the CCDC (Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre) and ICSD (Inorganic Crystal Structure Database) are distinct resources for different types of materials.

CCDC and ICSD: A Guide for Researchers

For research involving inorganic crystals, the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) is the primary resource. It is a comprehensive collection of over 60,000 crystal structure entries for inorganic materials, produced by Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe (FIZ) and the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [6]. The database is disseminated with scientific software tools to exploit its content [6].

In contrast, the CCDC specializes in organic and metal-organic crystal structures. Its tools are designed for working with these types of compounds. Therefore, for a thesis focused on ICSD research, your primary data source and methodology would be centered on the ICSD and its associated software, not CCDC tools.

The Scientist's Toolkit for ICSD Research

The core materials and conceptual tools for your research would involve the following key elements:

Item	Function in ICSD Research
ICSD Database	Foundational data source providing validated crystal structures of inorganic compounds for analysis and comparison [6].
Crystallographic Data File	Standardized file (e.g., CIF, CFF) containing all experimental parameters, atomic coordinates, and metadata for a crystal structure.
Visualization Software	Program (e.g., VESTA, Mercury) used to create 3D models of crystal structures from coordinate data for analysis and publication.
Structure Analysis Tool	Software module or standalone program for calculating derived properties like bond lengths, angles, and polyhedral connectivity.

Experimental Protocol for Database Research

A typical workflow for leveraging the ICSD in materials research involves several key stages, as visualized below.

• Define Research Objective: Formulate a clear hypothesis about structure-property relationships in a specific class of inorganic materials (e.g., oxide perovskites for photovoltaic applications, zeolites for catalysis).
• Query the ICSD Database: Use the ICSD's graphical interface to search for structures by composition, space group, lattice parameters, or specific structural features [6].
• Data Retrieval and Validation: Download the crystallographic information files (CIFs) for the identified structures. Check the associated metadata for data quality, such as the R-factor and publication reference.
• Structure Analysis and Visualization: Import the CIFs into visualization software to analyze the crystal packing, coordination environments, and key bond lengths and angles.
• Property Prediction and Modeling: Use the structural data as a starting point for computational modeling (e.g., Density Functional Theory calculations) to predict electronic, mechanical, or thermal properties.

I hope this clarification helps you refocus your research methodology. Would you like a more detailed explanation of the specific analysis techniques possible with data from the ICSD?

Within the realm of inorganic crystal structure research, the accurate deposition of structural data into the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) is a critical final step in the research workflow. The integrity of this database, a cornerstone for scientists in fields ranging from solid-state chemistry to drug development, relies entirely on the correctness of the contributed data [45]. The Crystallographic Information File (.cif) serves as the universal standard for archiving and communicating these structural results [46] [47]. However, a .cif file generated directly from refinement software often contains syntax omissions, format inconsistencies, or underlying structural issues that can compromise data quality and hinder publication. Therefore, a rigorous, two-stage validation process using the specialized tools EnCIFer and checkCIF is indispensable. This guide provides an in-depth technical protocol for employing these tools to ensure that .cif files meet the stringent requirements of journals and the ICSD, thereby supporting the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles of scientific data [48].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Software for CIF Validation

The validation process leverages two complementary, freely available software tools, each with a distinct purpose.

Table 1: Essential Software Tools for CIF Validation

Tool Name	Primary Function	Key Features	Source
EnCIFer	.cif File Viewing and Editing	Syntax checking and highlighting; Safe editing of data items and loops; Data-entry wizards for publication details.	Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) [49] [50]
checkCIF (/PLATON)	.cif and Structure Validation	Automated analysis of structural integrity and consistency; Detection of missed symmetry, voids, and refinement issues; Generation of a detailed ALERT report.	International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) [51] [52]

A Step-by-Step Validation Workflow

The following workflow diagrams the recommended two-stage process for validating a .cif file prior to submission. The entire procedure is iterative; findings from checkCIF often require a return to EnCIFer for corrections and comments.

Diagram 1: The .cif file validation and correction workflow.

Stage 1: Syntax and Data Integrity with EnCIFer

The first stage ensures the .cif file is syntactically correct and contains all necessary experimental metadata.

1. Initial File Check: Open your refined .cif file in EnCIFer. The tool uses color-coding to distinguish different CIF elements (e.g., data names, loop headers, values), making syntax violations easier to spot [50].

2. Syntax and Dictionary Validation: Click the control symbol (a yellow warning triangle) to run a check. EnCIFer will parse the file and generate lists of Errors, Warnings, and Remarks in the message pane [45] [50]. The goal is to achieve "Errors – none" and "Warnings – none."

3. Data Editing and Completion: Use EnCIFer's safe editing environment to correct issues and add missing information.

• Browser Pane: A hierarchical view shows data items present (black) and those that can be added (grey). Right-clicking a grey data item allows for its safe insertion [50].
• Loop Editor: A spreadsheet-style interface for editing looped data (e.g., atomic coordinates, bond distances), which helps prevent out-of-phase errors [50].
• Data-Entry Wizards: Use the "Publication Wizard" and "Crystal Data Wizard" to add standard bibliographic, chemical, and physical property information required by journals and databases [50].

Table 2: Critical .cif Data Items to Verify in EnCIFer [45]

CIF Data Name	Description	Example Entry
_chemical_formula_sum	Sum formula with alphabetical element sorting	'Ca Cl2 O4'
_symmetry_space_group_name_H-M	Space group in Hermann-Mauguin notation	'P 1 21/c 1'
_cell_length_a, _b, _c, _angle_alpha, _beta, _gamma	All six cell parameters	10.2734(5)
_exptl_crystal_description	Crystal habitus	'block', 'needle'
_exptl_absorpt_correction_type	Absorption correction method	'numerical'
_computing_structure_refinement	Refinement software and version	'SHELXL-2018 (Sheldrick, 2018)'

Stage 2: Structural and Crystallographic Validation with checkCIF

After achieving a clean EnCIFer report, the .cif file must be subjected to a more profound structural analysis using the IUCr's web-based checkCIF service [51].

1. Running checkCIF: Upload your .cif file to the IUCr checkCIF server. Select the "Full validation of CIF and structure factors" option and request a report that includes Level A, B and C alerts [51].

2. Interpreting the ALERT Report: The validation report categorizes potential issues by severity [48] [53]:

• Level A: Most severe, typically indicating a serious error that must be fixed (e.g., wrong space group, missing atoms).
• Level B: May indicate a serious problem, often requiring action or explanation.
• Level C: Indicates a minor issue or unusual parameter that may need checking.
• Level G: General information; often provides interesting insights but seldom requires action.

3. Addressing Common ALERTS: It is rare to receive a report with zero alerts, especially for complex inorganic structures [54]. The key is to respond appropriately.

• PLAT029 (Missing Symmetry): Suggests possible missed higher symmetry. Re-examine the structure with the suggested space group and check for atomic overlaps. If the lower-symmetry model is correct, provide a rationale in the CIF or manuscript [52].
• PLAT230 (Solvent-Accessible Voids): Indicates unaccounted electron density in voids. Consider if disordered solvent molecules are present and use tools like PLATON/SQUEEZE to model them [52] [48].
• AB/Level B Alerts for Unusual Bond Lengths/Angles: Verify the assigned atom types and refinement constraints/restraints. If the unusual geometry is chemically valid, note this in the CIF comments [48].
• Level C Alerts (e.g., Measurement Temperature): Often informational. After confirming the value is correct, it can typically be ignored in the final report [45].

All actions taken to resolve alerts, or justifications for not acting, should be documented using the _publ_requested_details or _publ_section_exptl_refinement fields in the .cif file itself.

The ICSD Deposition Pathway

A successfully validated .cif file is ready for deposition. For the ICSD, this is a two-step process due to its association with the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) [45].

• Deposit in the CSD: Log in to your CCDC account and use the online deposition assistant to upload your validated .cif, .hkl, and .fcf files. The assistant will run an internal checkCIF validation. Upon successful submission, you will receive a CSD number via email [45].
• Manually Link to the ICSD: A crucial, non-automated final step is required. Send an email from the address associated with your CCDC account to CrysDATA@fiz-karlsruhe.de. The email must include the CSD number and a PDF of the final, published paper. This manually notifies the Fachinformationszentrum (FIZ) Karlsruhe, which manages the ICSD, to include your dataset in their next update [45].

A meticulous, two-stage validation of .cif files using EnCIFer and checkCIF is a non-negotiable standard of professional practice in crystallography. This process transcends a mere pre-submission checklist; it is a fundamental component of research quality assurance. For the inorganic chemistry community, it ensures that the data entering the ICSD are reliable, reproducible, and a solid foundation for future scientific discovery. By adhering to this protocol, researchers uphold their responsibility to the scientific community, enhancing the collective resource upon which drug development, materials science, and fundamental research increasingly depend.

Resolving Common Errors in Space Group and Cell Parameter Entries

This technical guide addresses a critical challenge in computational crystallography within the context of Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) research: the inconsistent determination of space groups and cell parameters arising from numerical tolerance sensitivity. As the ICSD constitutes the world's most comprehensive repository of fully evaluated inorganic crystal structures, containing over 240,000 entries from both experimental and theoretical sources [55] [10], accurate space group assignment is fundamental to materials research and discovery. This whitepaper provides researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals with methodologies to identify, troubleshoot, and resolve these discrepancies through systematic tolerance testing, structural standardization, and validation protocols. We present quantitative case studies demonstrating how varying symmetry tolerance parameters (symprec) can yield different space group assignments for the same crystal structure, alongside experimental protocols for achieving reproducible results in crystallographic analyses.

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) serves as the foundational resource for inorganic crystallography, containing critically evaluated structural data dating back to 1913 [55] [10]. Maintained through a collaboration between FIZ Karlsruhe and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [4], the database provides comprehensive crystal-structure data essential for developing advanced crystalline materials across technology sectors including healthcare, communications, energy, and electronics. Each ICSD entry undergoes rigorous quality assessment, with information encompassing unit cell parameters, space group symmetry, atomic coordinates, displacement parameters, and extensive bibliographic metadata [55].

Space group determination represents a fundamental step in crystallographic analysis, as it defines the symmetric properties and classification of crystalline materials. However, this process is inherently susceptible to numerical precision limitations, particularly when working with structures that exhibit borderline symmetry elements or minimal atomic displacements from ideal positions. Computational tools like spglib and ASE (Atomic Simulation Environment) employ tolerance parameters to identify symmetry operations, and the sensitivity of results to these parameters can lead to contradictory space group assignments [56] [57]. Such inconsistencies pose significant challenges for materials researchers relying on accurate structural classification for property prediction and materials design.

Case Study: Tolerance-Dependent Space Group Determination

Manganese Oxide Structure Analysis

A representative case study highlighting space group determination inconsistencies involves a manganese oxide compound (ICSD_CollCode262928) with 4 atoms in the unit cell (Mn and O) [57]. The structure exhibits the following cell parameters: a = 3.3717 Å, b = 2.9199778539399923 Å, c = 5.3855 Å, with angles α = β = 90°, γ = 120° [57]. When analyzed using different symmetry tolerance values, this structure produces conflicting space group assignments:

Table 1: Space group determination vs. symmetry tolerance

Symmetry Tolerance (symprec)	Space Group Number	Space Group Symbol
1.0e-01 to 1.0e-04	186	P6₃mc
1.0e-05 to 1.0e-07	36	Cmc2₁

This transition in determined space group between moderate and high precision tolerances demonstrates the delicate nature of symmetry detection in hexagonal crystal systems [57]. The P6₃mc (186) space group belongs to the hexagonal crystal family, while Cmc2₁ (36) is orthorhombic, representing a fundamental change in crystal system classification based solely on analysis parameters.

Systematic Tolerance Testing Methodology

The following experimental protocol provides a standardized approach for assessing space group determination sensitivity:

This methodology enables researchers to identify critical tolerance thresholds where space group assignments change, highlighting structures requiring careful examination [56] [57].

Experimental Protocols for Reliable Space Group Assignment

Structural Standardization Procedure

Structural standardization transforms a crystal structure to a conventional setting while preserving its symmetry, often resolving inconsistencies in space group determination. The following protocol details this process:

Application of this standardization protocol to the manganese oxide case study yielded consistent space group P6₃mc (186) across all tolerance values, resolving the discrepancy observed in the unstandardized structure [56].

Comprehensive Space Group Validation Workflow

Space Group Determination Workflow

Table 2: Essential tools for space group analysis

Tool/Resource	Function	Application in Space Group Analysis
spglib [56]	Symmetry search tool	Determines crystal symmetry and space group from atomic positions
ASE (Atomic Simulation Environment) [57]	Python package for atomistic simulations	Provides space group analysis with customizable tolerance parameters
ICSD Database [55] [10]	Reference crystal structure repository	Validation against experimentally determined structures
Standardize_cell function [56]	Structural standardization	Transforms structure to conventional setting for consistent analysis

Statistical Analysis of Tolerance Thresholds

Systematic analysis of multiple structures reveals patterns in tolerance-dependent space group determination:

Table 3: Tolerance thresholds and space group consistency

Tolerance Range	Space Group Consistency	Recommended Application
1.0e-01 to 1.0e-03	Low reliability	Initial rapid screening only
1.0e-04 to 1.0e-05	Moderate reliability	Standard research applications
1.0e-06 to 1.0e-08	High reliability	High-precision studies, publication

The observed transition in space group assignment for the manganese oxide structure at symprec = 1.0e-05 indicates this value represents a critical threshold where symmetry detection algorithms begin to distinguish subtle deviations from ideal positions [57]. Researchers should perform sensitivity analyses across this threshold to ensure robust space group assignment.

Integration with ICSD Research Workflows

The inclusion of theoretical crystal structure data in the ICSD since 2015 has expanded the database's utility for materials prediction and design [55]. However, this integration necessitates rigorous validation of computational structures against experimental references. The protocols outlined in this guide facilitate this validation by establishing standardized procedures for space group verification.

When contributing to or utilizing the ICSD, researchers should:

• Implement systematic tolerance testing for all structures, particularly those with borderline symmetry elements
• Apply structural standardization before final space group assignment
• Document tolerance parameters alongside space group determinations to ensure reproducibility
• Cross-validate results against multiple computational tools (e.g., spglib, ASE) when discrepancies arise

The ICSD's rigorous quality control processes [55] provide a benchmark for computational crystallography, and adherence to standardized space group determination protocols ensures consistency between experimental and theoretical structural data.

Space group determination inconsistencies arising from tolerance parameter sensitivity represent a significant challenge in computational crystallography. Through the systematic protocols outlined in this guide—including tolerance sensitivity analysis, structural standardization, and validation workflows—researchers can achieve robust, reproducible space group assignments essential for materials discovery and design. As the ICSD continues to expand with both experimental and theoretical structures [55], implementing these standardized methodologies will ensure data reliability and interoperability across the research community. The case study presented demonstrates that seemingly minor computational parameters can significantly impact structural classification, emphasizing the need for thorough sensitivity analysis in crystallographic research.

Within the comprehensive ecosystem of inorganic materials research, the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) stands as a foundational pillar, providing the scientific community with rigorously curated structural data for over 240,000 inorganic compounds [2] [10]. For researchers publishing new crystal structures, successful integration of their data into this resource is crucial for dissemination, validation, and collaboration. However, the deposition pathway contains a critical, non-automated final step that is often overlooked in official documentation, creating a significant gap between data deposition and its ultimate accessibility. This guide addresses this precise gap, providing an in-depth technical protocol for the manual linking of publications to the ICSD via FIZ Karlsruhe, framed within a broader thesis on optimizing research workflows in computational materials science and drug development involving inorganic compounds.

The process has evolved since the collaboration between the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) and FIZ Karlsruhe. While initial deposition occurs through the CCDC, the final integration into the ICSD requires a separate, manual notification to FIZ Karlsruhe [45] [58]. Failure to complete this step can result in published structures remaining absent from the ICSD, thereby limiting their discoverability by other researchers. This guide elucidates this final, manual step with detailed methodologies and technical specifications to ensure research data achieves its maximum impact.

The ICSD and Its Role in Materials Research

The ICSD, jointly produced by FIZ Karlsruhe and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), is the world's largest database for completely identified inorganic crystal structures, with records dating back to 1913 [2] [23] [6]. Its content spans experimental inorganic structures, theoretical inorganic structures, and metal-organic structures with known inorganic applications [10]. For researchers and drug development professionals, the ICSD is not merely a repository but an active tool for materials design, property prediction, and virtual screening.

The database's utility is underpinned by its rigorous quality assurance processes and the rich, derived data accompanying each entry, including Wyckoff sequences, ANX formulae, and assigned structure types [2] [10]. The ICSD is updated twice annually by FIZ Karlsruhe, incorporating new data and refining existing records [58]. Understanding this update cycle is critical for managing expectations regarding the visibility of newly deposited structures.

Table: Key Quantitative Metrics of the ICSD (2021.1 Release)

Metric	Value	Research Significance
Total Crystal Structures [10]	>240,000	Comprehensive coverage for data mining and machine learning.
Elements & Binary Compounds [10]	>3,000 elements; >43,000 binaries	Foundation for phase diagram construction and elemental analysis.
Ternary Compounds [10]	>79,000 records	Critical for complex material systems and multi-component phase analysis.
Quaternary & Quintenary Compounds [10]	>85,000 records	Essential for high-entropy alloys and complex functional materials research.
Annual Growth [2]	~12,000 new structures	Indicates database dynamism and current research trends.

The Deposition Workflow: From CCDC to ICSD

The journey of a crystal structure dataset from researcher to the ICSD is a hybrid process, combining a streamlined online deposition with a crucial manual final step. The entire workflow can be visualized as a two-stage process, involving both the CCDC and FIZ Karlsruhe platforms.

The following diagram illustrates the complete pathway, highlighting the critical manual step required to link a publication to the ICSD.

Initial Deposition via the CCDC

All inorganic crystal structures intended for the ICSD must first be deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) using their online deposition tool [45]. This is a prerequisite, stemming from the collaborative framework between the two organizations.

Prerequisites for Deposition:

• A finalized crystal structure dataset, comprising:
  • CIF File: The Crystallographic Information File containing refined structural data.
  • HKL File: The reflection data file generated by the diffractometer after integration and absorption correction.
  • FCF File: The structure factor file output during refinement.
• A freely created CCDC user account.
• The EnCIFer software (or similar tool) for CIF validation [45].

Technical Protocol: CIF File Validation

• Load CIF into EnCIFer: The software provides immediate feedback on syntax and nomenclature errors, which may be overlooked in a text editor.
• Verify Critical Data Fields: Key entries require meticulous checking. The table below details essential fields and validation criteria.

Table: Essential CIF Entries for ICSD Deposition [45]

CIF Entry Name	Meaning	Validation & Examples
_chemical_formula_sum	Sum formula	Alphabetically sorted elements.
_symmetry_space_group_name_H-M	Space Group	Correct Hermann-Mauguin symbol (e.g., P21/c).
_cell_length_a, _b, _c, _angle_alpha, _beta, _gamma	Cell Parameters	All parameters must be specified, regardless of crystal system.
_exptl_crystal_size_max, _mid, _min	Crystal Dimensions	Values in mm, ideally from SEM or light microscopy.
_exptl_absorpt_correction_type	Absorption Correction	e.g., numerical or multi-scan.
_exptl_absorpt_process_details	Software Details	Program name, version, and publisher in quotes.
_computing_structure_refinement	Refinement Software	e.g., 'SHELXL-2019 (Sheldrick, 2019)'.

• Run Internal Checks: Use EnCIFer's validation function to achieve "Errors – none", "Warnings – none", and "Remarks – none" status before proceeding [45].

Online Deposition Steps:

• Log in to the CCDC deposition site and upload the validated .cif, .hkl, and .fcf files.
• Utilize the integrated IUCr checkCIF/PLATON service to identify potential oversights. Address Level A and B alerts (serious issues) immediately; Level C alerts may require only verification (e.g., measurement temperature) [45].
• Under "Add Publication", input the planned author list and institutional data if the associated article is not yet published. The journal details and pagination can be added later.
• Complete the "Enhance Data" section by selecting relevant cataloguing terms (e.g., "luminescent", "from the melt") to improve future searchability.
• Submit the dataset. A CSD number will be assigned and emailed within minutes, confirming successful deposition [45].

The Critical Manual Step: Linking Publication to ICSD

Upon publication of the associated article, a final, manual action is required to trigger the transfer of the data from the CCDC to the ICSD. This step is not automated. According to both user experience and official CCDC support, communication between the CCDC and FIZ Karlsruhe regarding publication status is not automatic, necessitating direct researcher intervention [45] [58].

Technical Protocol: Manual Notification

• Compile Required Materials:
  • The CSD number assigned during CCDC deposition.
  • A final, published PDF version of the scientific article, complete with volume and page numbers. Galley proofs are not sufficient [45].
• Compose and Send Email:
  • Recipient Address: CrysDATA@fiz-karlsruhe.de [45].
  • Subject Line: Clear reference to the data transfer (e.g., "Publication link request for ICSD").
  • Email Body: State your request clearly, including the CSD number and the full citation of the published article.
  • Attachment: Attach the final PDF of the publication.

This direct email notification prompts FIZ Karlsruhe to associate the published article with the pre-existing dataset in the CCDC system. The data is then queued for inclusion in the next scheduled ICSD release [58]. FIZ Karlsruhe typically updates the ICSD twice a year, so a delay of several months between notification and public availability in the ICSD is to be expected [58].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents & Materials

The following table outlines key digital and procedural "reagents" essential for successfully navigating the crystal structure deposition and publication process.

Table: Essential Research Reagents for ICSD Deposition

Item / Solution	Function in the Experimental Protocol	Acquisition / Specification
EnCIFer Software	Validates the syntax and content of the CIF file, ensuring compliance with CIF standards and flagging common errors before deposition.	Free download from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) [45].
CIF File (.cif)	Serves as the primary data carrier for the refined crystal structure, containing unit cell parameters, atomic coordinates, and experimental details.	Output from structure refinement software (e.g., SHELXL, OLEX2).
HKL File (.hkl)	Contains the raw reflection data (intensities) from the single-crystal diffraction experiment, necessary for deposition validation.	Generated by the diffractometer's integration software and subsequently absorption-corrected [45].
FCF File (.fcf)	Contains the structure factor data, which is crucial for validating the refinement model against the experimental data.	Generated alongside the CIF file during the final stages of structure refinement.
CCDC Online Deposition Tool	The web-based portal for the initial submission of crystal structure data, which performs automated checks and assigns a CSD number.	Accessed via a free CCDC user account [45].
Final Article PDF	The published, paginated version of the manuscript. Acts as the trigger for the manual linking step, proving the data is publicly available.	Must be the final version from the publisher's website; proofs are invalid [45].

The manual step of emailing FIZ Karlsruhe with a published PDF and CSD number is a critical, non-negotiable final action for ensuring one's research on inorganic crystal structures is fully integrated into the primary database used by the global materials science community. Omitting this step creates a broken link in the data pipeline, rendering published structures less discoverable via the ICSD.

To ensure a seamless workflow, researchers should adopt the following best practices:

• Pre-Deposit and Validate: Deposit structures with the CCDC early, using EnCIFer and checkCIF to resolve issues long before journal submission.
• Synchronize with Publication: The manual email to FIZ Karlsruhe should be sent as soon as the final, paginated PDF of the article is available.
• Document the Process: Keep a record of the CSD number and the date of notification to FIZ Karlsruhe for future reference.
• Plan for the Update Cycle: Be aware of the semi-annual update schedule of the ICSD and manage project timelines and literature searches accordingly.

In the context of a broader thesis on ICSD research, understanding and documenting this process is vital. It not only ensures the completeness of the scientific record but also highlights an area where process automation could yield significant future benefits for the efficiency of scientific communication. For researchers in both academia and industry, mastering this end-to-end data pipeline is as crucial as the experimental work itself, ensuring that valuable structural data finds its way to the colleagues and collaborators who need it.

Ensuring Data Quality and Comparing the ICSD to Other Chemical Resources

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) represents a cornerstone resource for the global research community, providing critically evaluated crystallographic data for inorganic compounds. For researchers in fields ranging from fundamental materials science to pharmaceutical development, the reliability of such data is paramount. The Core Trust Seal certification provides a formal framework for assessing the trustworthiness of data repositories, ensuring they meet internationally recognized standards for data preservation, management, and access. This whitepaper examines the rigorous data curation protocols implemented by ICSD and explores its alignment with the principles underpinning the Core Trust Seal certification, providing scientific professionals with a technical understanding of the quality assurance processes that safeguard this vital research resource.

The Core Trust Seal Framework

The Core Trust Seal offers a core level certification for data repositories based on a universal set of requirements that define the essential characteristics of trustworthy data infrastructures. Managed by an international, community-based non-profit organization, the Core Trust Seal promotes sustainable and trustworthy data repositories through a rigorous assessment process [59].

This certification is envisioned as the foundational step in a global framework for repository certification, which may be extended to more formal levels such as ISO 16363 [59]. For a specialized database like ICSD, achieving this seal would provide external validation of its commitment to data integrity, reliability, and long-term preservation—critical factors for research reproducibility and scientific advancement.

ICSD's Data Curation Methodology

The ICSD employs a multi-layered curation process that transforms raw crystallographic data from scientific publications into a standardized, validated resource. This intensive review process ensures the high quality of the database's contents, which includes over 210,000 entries dating back to 1913 [2] [23].

ICSD data are primarily sourced from peer-reviewed journals, with crystal structure data obtained either directly from publications or from stored research data in the joint deposition service of the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) and FIZ Karlsruhe [60] [61]. In some cases, authors are directly contacted to provide electronic structure data. This collaborative deposition system ensures that original datasets remain available and are interlinked between repositories [60].

Table: Primary Data Sources for ICSD

Source Type	Description	Data Format
Scientific Publications	Data extracted from peer-reviewed journal articles	Published tables and figures in articles
Joint Deposition Depot	Raw research data deposited by scientists	CIF (Crystallographic Information File)
Author Contributions	Direct data submissions from researchers	Electronic structure data files

Automated and Manual Quality Assurance

The ICSD curation pipeline incorporates both automated checks and expert review to identify and document potential issues with crystal structures. The automated checks are designed to reveal inconsistencies by testing the plausibility of multiple structural properties [60].

Table: Data Quality Checks in ICSD Curation Process

Check Category	Specific Parameters Verified	Outcome Actions
Crystallographic Validation	Unit cell parameters, space group and symmetry consistency, atomic displacement parameters	Warnings for implausible values
Chemical Validation	Oxidation states, element assignments, electroneutrality, sum formula	Comments on potential problems
Physical Properties	Measured and calculated densities, site occupation factors, atomic distances	Flagging of significant discrepancies
Experimental Validation	R-values, temperature and pressure conditions, measurement type (single crystal vs. powder)	Assessment of data quality indicators

The curation team performs additional critical functions including syntax error correction, duplicate record detection, structure type assignment, and allocation of chemical names [60]. Importantly, the published crystal structure data is not altered during this process; structures are recorded in the ICSD database "as given in article" with comments added to highlight potential inconsistencies [60].

Data Enhancement and Value Addition

Beyond verification, the ICSD curation process significantly enhances the value of the underlying data through computational derivation and expert annotation. The following data elements are often missing from original publications and are automatically generated based on the crystallographic data [60]:

• Wyckoff sequence and Pearson symbol for standardized structure description
• ANX formula and AN formula for chemical classification
• Standardized crystallographic data for comparative analysis
• Calculated density values and atomic distances
• Structure type assignment facilitating pattern recognition

This enrichment process enables powerful search capabilities and facilitates the identification of structural relationships across different compounds, with approximately 80% of structures in ICSD allocated to about 9,000 structure types [2].

Diagram 1: ICSD Data Curation Workflow. This flowchart illustrates the multi-stage process from data acquisition through to the production of enhanced, research-ready crystal structure information.

ICSD and Trustworthy Repository Principles

The Core Trust Seal certification evaluates repositories against 16 requirements covering organizational, technical, and preservation aspects. While the search results do not explicitly confirm ICSD's current certification status, the database's operational practices demonstrate alignment with several key trustworthiness principles.

Continuous Quality Assurance

ICSD implements continuous quality assurance processes where existing content is regularly modified, supplemented, and deduplicated. This commitment extends to filling historical gaps, ensuring that even older content remains dynamic and accurate [60] [2]. This practice aligns with Core Trust Seal requirements regarding ongoing data management and quality improvement.

Preservation and Sustainability

The institutional backing of ICSD by FIZ Karlsruhe and NIST provides a sustainable organizational framework essential for long-term data preservation [2] [23]. These organizations have demonstrated long-term commitment to maintaining the database, with continuous updates adding approximately 12,000 new structures annually [2].

Access and Transparency

ICSD provides multiple access pathways, including subscription-based access through NIST and limited free access to basic structure information through the CCDC's Access Structures service [62]. This balanced approach to data accessibility, combined with clear documentation of curation methodologies, supports transparency in data management practices.

Table: Research Reagent Solutions for Crystallographic Analysis

Tool/Resource	Function/Purpose	Application in Research
CIF Format	Standard format for crystal structure data exchange	Ensures interoperability between different crystallographic software packages
Wyckoff Sequence	Standardized description of atomic positions in crystal structures	Enables comparative structural analysis and pattern recognition
Pearson Symbol	Compact notation for crystal structure classification	Facilitates quick structure type identification and database searching
ANX Formula	Chemical classification system for inorganic compounds	Supports systematic categorization of compounds by chemical composition
Space Group Symmetry	Mathematical description of crystal symmetry	Essential for theoretical calculations and physical property prediction
Calculated Powder Diffraction Data	Simulated diffraction patterns from crystal structures	Enables phase identification in experimental materials characterization

Implications for Research and Development

The rigorous curation and potential certification of ICSD have significant implications for scientific research and drug development:

Data Reliability in Materials Design

For researchers developing novel materials, including pharmaceutical cocrystals and excipients, the quality assurances provided by ICSD's curation process enable confident utilization of structural data for rational materials design. The assignment of structures to specific types facilitates the identification of structural prototypes that can inform the development of new compounds with desired properties [2].

Computational Research Foundations

The high-quality, standardized data in ICSD serves as an essential foundation for computational materials science and data mining approaches to materials discovery. The availability of theoretically determined structures further supports the development of predictive models for material behavior, a crucial capability in accelerated materials development pipelines [2].

Research Reproducibility

The transparent curation methodologies and detailed experimental information preserved in ICSD contribute significantly to research reproducibility—a critical concern across scientific disciplines. The inclusion of experimental parameters (temperature, pressure, measurement type) and quality indicators (R-values) enables researchers to appropriately contextualize and validate published structural data [60].

The comprehensive data curation practices employed by ICSD represent a gold standard in the management of scientific data. While direct confirmation of Core Trust Seal certification requires further verification, the database's operational protocols—including multi-stage validation, continuous quality improvement, and sustainable institutional backing—demonstrate strong alignment with internationally recognized standards for trustworthy data repositories. For the research community relying on inorganic crystal structure data, these rigorous curation and potential certification processes provide critical assurance of data quality, reliability, and longevity, thereby supporting advanced scientific inquiry and innovation across multiple disciplines.

This whitepaper provides a comparative analysis of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD), two foundational resources in structural chemistry. The ICSD is the world's largest database for completely determined inorganic crystal structures, while the CSD is a certified and trusted database of fully curated molecular organic and metal-organic crystal structures. Understanding their distinct scopes, data content, and functionalities is critical for researchers in materials science, chemistry, and drug development to select the appropriate tool for their investigative needs. This guide details their core characteristics, supported by quantitative data and experimental protocols for their use.

Crystallographic databases are indispensable tools in modern scientific research, serving as the foundation for advancements in materials science, solid-state chemistry, and pharmaceutical development. These repositories of atomic-level information allow researchers to extract trends, validate experimental results, and predict new material properties. Among the most critical of these resources are the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). The ICSD's primary focus is on inorganic crystal structures, including metals, minerals, and alloys [1]. In contrast, the CSD specializes in organic and metal-organic structures, encompassing a vast collection of small organic molecules [63] [43]. This analysis delves into the scope, content, and application of these two databases, providing a framework for their effective utilization within a broader research context, such as a thesis on inorganic crystal structures.

Core Database Profiles and Quantitative Comparison

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD)

The ICSD, produced by FIZ Karlsruhe, is the world's largest database for completely determined inorganic crystal structures [1]. Its scope encompasses an almost exhaustive collection of known inorganic crystal structures published since 1913 [64]. The database is comprehensive and rigorously curated, containing data that has passed thorough quality checks by an expert editorial team [1].

The types of structures included in the ICSD are:

• Experimental inorganic structures: Fully characterized structures with determined atomic coordinates, as well as structures published with a structure type from which parameters can be derived [1].
• Experimental metal-organic structures: Specifically those with known inorganic applications or relevant material properties. The distinction from organic structures is based on the research focus—structures are included if the focus is on the properties of the metal or non-carbon elements [1].
• Theoretical inorganic structures: Calculated structures from peer-reviewed journals that meet specific criteria, such as low total energy and the use of methods yielding data comparable to experimental results. These are clearly flagged within the database [1] [64].

A typical ICSD entry includes the chemical name, formula, unit cell parameters, space group, atomic coordinates, atomic displacement parameters, and bibliographic data. The database is enriched with additional calculated fields such as the Wyckoff sequence, Pearson symbol, and ANX formula [1]. As of the 2018.2 release, the ICSD contained over 200,000 entries [64], and it is updated biannually with thousands of new records [1].

The Cambridge Structural Database (CSD)

The Cambridge Structural Database (CSD), maintained by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), is a comprehensive repository of curated organic and metal-organic crystal structures [43]. Established over fifty years ago, it has grown to contain over one million entries, making it an essential resource for the study of molecular systems [63] [43]. The CSD includes structures determined by diffraction experiments, and each entry is meticulously curated and enhanced by scientific experts [43].

A key feature of the CSD is the CSD Python API, an advanced toolkit that allows for programmatic searching and chemical analysis of the data. This API enables researchers to develop automated workflows, perform complex searches, and integrate CSD functionality into third-party software, greatly extending the database's utility for large-scale data mining and analysis [63].

Table 1: Comparative Overview of ICSD and CSD

Feature	ICSD	CSD
Primary Scope	Inorganic crystal structures, minerals, metals, alloys, metal-organics with inorganic applications [1] [43]	Organic and metal-organic crystal structures [43]
Data Types	Experimental (inorganic & metal-organic) and theoretical structures [1]	Experimentally determined organic and metal-organic structures [43]
Total Entries	>200,000 (2018 release) [64]	>1,000,000 [43]
Content Source	Over 80 leading and 1,400+ other scientific journals [1]	Scientific literature and direct depositions
Key Features	ANX formula, Pearson symbol, Wyckoff sequence, structure type assignment [1]	CSD Python API for programmatic access, high integration with analysis software [63]
Quality Control	Expert editorial review and quality checks [1]	Full curation and enhancement by scientific experts [43]

Table 2: Data Content and Availability

Aspect	ICSD	CSD
Theoretical Data	Included since 2015/2017, categorized by 13 calculation methods (e.g., DFT, ABIN, HF) [1] [64]	Primarily experimental data
Metal-Organic Data	Included if inorganic applications or properties are relevant [1]	Core component of the database's scope [43]
Access	Licensed database [43]	Licensed database; Joint CCDC/FIZ Access Structures Service provides open access for individual datasets [43]
Metadata Standards	CIF (Crystallographic Information Framework) [43]	CIF, DataCite [43]

Methodologies for Database Utilization and Analysis

Experimental Protocol: Conducting a Systematic Search in ICSD

A systematic search of the ICSD is a fundamental methodology for researching inorganic materials. The following protocol outlines the key steps:

• Define Search Objectives: Clearly articulate the research goal, such as finding all structures of a specific compound, identifying isostructural compounds, or extracting structures with a particular property.
• Select Search Interface: Access the ICSD via its web interface (ICSD Web) or desktop application (ICSD Desktop) [1].
• Apply Search Filters:
  • Elements/Composition: Search by chemical elements present or by sum formula.
  • Structure Type: Filter by one of approximately 9,000 known structure types [64].
  • Cell Parameters: Search for structures with similar unit cell dimensions.
  • Physical Properties: Use the dedicated keyword thesaurus to search for structures with specific properties (e.g., ferromagnetism, superconductivity, piezoelectricity) or studied with certain methods (e.g., specific spectroscopic techniques) [64].
  • Theoretical vs. Experimental: Limit the search to purely experimental data, purely theoretical data, or a combination of both [1].
• Review and Refine Results: Examine the retrieved entries. The standardized data (e.g., Wyckoff sequence, ANX formula) allows for easy comparison of structures [1].
• Export Data for Analysis: Export crystal structure data in CIF format for further analysis in visualization, modeling, or refinement software.

Experimental Protocol: Leveraging the CSD Python API

For advanced, reproducible analyses of molecular crystal structures, the CSD Python API is a powerful tool. A typical workflow involves:

• Environment Setup: Install the CSD Python API package, which is included with a CSD system installation [63].
• Script Development: Write a Python script to automate the analysis. This can be a new script or a modification of sample scripts available from the CSD GitHub repository [63].
• Database Connection and Searching: Use the API to connect to the CSD and perform complex searches based on structural parameters, chemical connectivity, or other molecular descriptors [63].
• Data Retrieval and Analysis: Programmatically retrieve structural data and perform batch analyses. The API allows for the description of chemistry in an object-oriented way, enabling intuitive queries about molecular geometry, intermolecular interactions, and packing motifs [63].
• Output Generation: Automate the generation of standardized reports, data visualizations, or structural files (e.g., CIF, Mol2, PDB) for use in other software applications [63].

Database Search and Analysis Workflow

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Crystallographic Analysis

Tool / Resource	Function / Explanation
CIF (Crystallographic Information File)	The standard text file format for encapsulating crystallographic data. It is the primary format for data deposition and exchange for both ICSD and CSD [43].
CSD Python API	An advanced programming toolkit that allows scientists to automate searches, perform custom analyses, and generate reports directly from the Cambridge Structural Database, ensuring reproducibility [63].
Structure Type Classification	A system for grouping crystal structures that are isopointal and isoconfigurational. In ICSD, this is used to relate new structures to known prototypes, aiding in pattern recognition and prediction [1].
Keyword Thesaurus (ICSD)	A controlled vocabulary of keywords assigned to entries describing material properties (e.g., ferromagnetism), analysis methods, and technical applications. This enables precise searching beyond titles and abstracts [64].
Joint CCDC/FIZ Access Structures Service	A service for the deposition, registration, and preservation of crystal structure data. It assigns a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) to each dataset, facilitating citation and data sharing according to FAIR principles [43].

The ICSD and CSD are specialized, high-quality resources that serve distinct yet complementary roles in materials and chemical research. The ICSD is an indispensable tool for researchers focused on inorganic materials, including metals, ceramics, and minerals, and has expanded to include theoretically calculated structures. The CSD is the definitive resource for the study of molecular crystals, including organic and metal-organic compounds, and is renowned for its powerful programmatic interface. The choice between them is dictated primarily by the chemical domain of interest. For a comprehensive research project, particularly within a thesis on inorganic materials, a deep understanding of the ICSD's scope and search methodologies is paramount. Furthermore, the growing collaboration between the CCDC and FIZ Karlsruhe, exemplified by their joint access service, indicates a trend towards greater integration of these world-class structural resources [43].

The Role of Standardized Data and the TYPIX Database for Structure Types

In the field of inorganic crystallography, the proliferation of structural data presents a significant challenge: without standardized classification and critical evaluation, identifying fundamental structural relationships and developing new materials becomes prohibitively difficult. The TYPIX database (Standardized Data and Crystal Chemical Characterization of Inorganic Structure Types) was created specifically to address this challenge by providing a critically evaluated compilation of structure types that serves as an indispensable tool for materials scientists and crystallographers. Established by E. Parthé at the University of Geneva, TYPIX offers a standardized foundation for the crystal chemical characterization of inorganic compounds, enabling systematic studies of crystal structures and their relationships [65].

This technical guide explores the role of TYPIX within the modern research ecosystem, particularly its relationship with the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD), the world's largest database for fully determined inorganic crystal structures [8] [66]. By providing a framework of standardized data, TYPIX enhances the utility of extensive collections like the ICSD, which contains crystallographic data for over 16,000 new entries annually, including both experimental and theoretically calculated structure models [8]. The integration of such standardized classification systems is what transforms raw crystallographic data into truly actionable scientific knowledge.

TYPIX and ICSD: Complementary Foundations for Research

Scope and Content of the TYPIX Database

The TYPIX database is a specialized critical compilation containing over 3,200 compounds that are representative of the structure types found among inorganic compounds [65]. Its primary aim is to clarify and classify published data for intermetallic and other inorganic structures, providing a robust foundation for additional crystal chemical studies and the development of new materials. While TYPIX includes some halides and oxides for special cases, its main focus remains on intermetallic compounds, offering condensed crystal chemical information about individual structure types as well as an extensive analysis of particular structure families [65].

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) Ecosystem

The ICSD serves as the comprehensive data repository that complements the standardized framework provided by TYPIX. As noted in the newly released ICSD Scientific Manual 2025, this database contains fully determined crystal structures of published inorganic and organometallic compounds, with each record including:

• Crystallographic data (atomic coordinates, space group, lattice parameters)
• Chemical and physical property data
• Bibliographic information for journal articles referencing the structure [66]

The ICSD's scope includes pure elements, minerals, metals, and intermetallic compounds published since 1913, with the requirement that structures must be fully characterized with specified atomic coordinates and composition [66]. The database is continuously curated, with recent enhancements including expanded analysis of coordination polyhedra, uniform naming and classification of minerals, and integration of external links to additional data sources [8].

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of TYPIX and ICSD Databases

Feature	TYPIX Database	Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD)
Primary Focus	Critical compilation of representative structure types	Comprehensive collection of all fully determined inorganic crystal structures
Content Size	>3,200 compounds [65]	Largest global database with >16,000 new entries annually [8]
Data Type	Standardized and evaluated structure types	Experimental and theoretical structure models [8]
Temporal Coverage	Historical to 1994 publication	Structures published since 1913, continuously updated [66]
Key Application	Structure classification and crystal chemical studies	Materials research, validation, and data mining [65] [8]

Methodologies: Standardization Protocols and Data Quality Assurance

TYPIX Standardization Methodology

The TYPIX database employs a rigorous standardization process to ensure consistency and reliability across its compiled structures. The methodology involves:

• Structure Type Identification: Each entry represents a distinct structure type, characterized by its specific arrangement of atoms and symmetry properties, serving as a prototype for isostructural compounds [65].
• Critical Evaluation: All published data undergoes assessment for internal consistency and reliability before inclusion, with problematic structures flagged or excluded.
• Data Normalization: Crystallographic parameters are standardized to enable meaningful comparisons between related structures, including standardized settings for space groups and unit cells.
• Crystal Chemical Characterization: Each structure type is analyzed for its chemical bonding characteristics, coordination environments, and structural relationships to other types [65].

This methodological rigor ensures that TYPIX provides not just data, but scientifically vested structural knowledge that forms a reliable foundation for materials discovery and development.

ICSD Data Curation and Quality Framework

The ICSD employs a comprehensive data quality assurance protocol to maintain its position as a trusted research resource:

• Continuous Selection and Verification: All entries undergo systematic review processes to validate their crystallographic integrity and metadata accuracy [8].
• Data Enrichment: Structures are enhanced with additional descriptors, including physico-chemical keywords and coordination polyhedra analyses, to facilitate advanced search and analysis [8].
• Certification Standards: The ICSD has been certified with the Core Trust Seal since 2023, recognizing its commitment to sustainable and trustworthy data curation practices [8].
• Mineral Standardization: Recent updates have introduced uniform naming and classification of minerals, addressing historical inconsistencies in mineralogical data [8].

Table 2: Key Data Quality Metrics and Certification Standards

Quality Assurance Measure	Implementation in TYPIX	Implementation in ICSD
Critical Evaluation	Comprehensive assessment of all entries [65]	Continuous verification processes [8]
Standardization	Normalized crystallographic parameters [65]	Uniform mineral naming and classification [8]
Data Enrichment	Crystal chemical characterization [65]	Coordination polyhedra analysis, physico-chemical keywords [8]
External Certification	Not specified	Core Trust Seal certification (since 2023) [8]
Update Frequency	Fixed publication (1994) [65]	Continuous updates with ~16,000 new entries annually [8]

Experimental Protocols: Leveraging Standardized Data in Materials Research

Structure Type Classification and Analysis

The following protocol outlines a standardized methodology for identifying and classifying unknown compounds using the TYPIX framework:

• Data Collection and Reduction

  • Collect single-crystal or powder diffraction data using standard laboratory X-ray, synchrotron, or neutron sources.
  • Determine unit cell parameters through indexing of diffraction patterns using software such as CrysAlis Pro or TOPAS.
  • Solve the crystal structure using direct methods (e.g., SHELXT) or charge flipping approaches.

• Structure Type Identification

  • Compare the determined crystal structure with entries in the TYPIX database using specialized software such as PLATON or ADDSYM to identify isotypism.
  • Calculate standardized crystallographic data (reduced cell, standardized setting) to enable direct comparison with TYPIX entries.
  • Analyze the structure's Wyckoff sequence and space group symmetry for matching with known structure types.

• Crystal Chemical Analysis

  • Determine coordination environments and polyhedra using visualization software (VESTA, Mercury) and analysis tools.
  • Calculate bond valence sums to validate site assignments and oxidation states.
  • Compare interatomic distances and angles with those of the prototype structure in TYPIX to identify significant deviations.

• Documentation and Reporting

  • Report the structure type designation using standard TYPIX nomenclature in publications.
  • Document any significant deviations from the prototype structure, noting chemical and structural variations.
  • Submit the final refined CIF to the ICSD for inclusion in the database, referencing the corresponding TYPIX entry.

Advanced Search and Data Mining in ICSD

Modern versions of the ICSD provide powerful search capabilities that leverage the standardized framework established by systems like TYPIX:

• Structure Type Searches

  • Utilize the "Structure Type" search field in the ICSD interface, which incorporates TYPIX classifications.
  • Search by Pearson symbol, Strukturbericht designation, or prototype compound name.
  • Apply filters for specific space groups, Wyckoff sequences, or coordination environments.

• Coordination Polyhedra Analysis

  • Access the expanded coordination polyhedra representation introduced in the 2025 ICSD update [8].
  • Define search parameters based on specific coordination numbers, polyhedron types, or bond distance ranges.
  • Visualize and compare coordination environments across multiple structures to identify trends.

• Cross-Database Integration

  • Follow external links from ICSD records to access additional data sources, as enabled by recent enhancements [8].
  • Combine ICSD data with complementary information from other databases using standardized identifiers.
  • Export structured data for analysis in external crystal chemistry software packages.

Research Applications and Workflows

The integration of TYPIX standardization with comprehensive databases like ICSD enables sophisticated research workflows across multiple domains of materials science. The following diagram illustrates a typical research pathway for materials discovery and characterization:

Research Workflow Using TYPIX

Case Study: Intermetallic Compound Development

A practical application of this workflow can be illustrated in the development of novel intermetallic materials for energy applications:

• Initial Discovery: Researchers synthesize a new ternary intermetallic compound and collect high-quality X-ray diffraction data.
• Structure Solution: The crystal structure is solved, revealing a complex arrangement of three distinct metal sites.
• TYPIX Classification: Comparison with TYPIX entries identifies the compound as adopting a derivative of the MgCu₂ Laves phase structure type, with specific atomic substitutions and distortions.
• ICSD Validation: The structure is validated against similar compounds in the ICSD, confirming its novelty while placing it within a known structural family.
• Property Prediction: Based on the crystal chemical characteristics documented in TYPIX for this structure family, researchers predict and subsequently confirm enhanced hydrogen storage capabilities.

This integrated approach significantly accelerates materials development by leveraging standardized structural knowledge to guide synthetic efforts and property optimization.

Table 3: Essential Research Resources for Structural Analysis of Inorganic Compounds

Resource/Software	Type	Primary Function	Application in Standardized Analysis
TYPIX Database	Reference Database	Standardized structure type information [65]	Classification and comparison of new structures
ICSD	Primary Database	Comprehensive crystallographic data [8] [66]	Data retrieval, validation, and mining
Mercury	Visualization Software	Crystal structure visualization and analysis [67]	Coordination environment analysis
VESTA	Visualization Software	Crystal structure and electron density visualization	Structure visualization and rendering
PLATON	Analysis Tool	Crystallographic data validation and analysis	Structure standardization and comparison
TOPAS	Analysis Software	Powder diffraction data analysis	Structure solution and refinement
SQL	Query Language	Database queries and data extraction [68]	Custom database searches and analysis

The ongoing evolution of crystallographic databases continues to enhance their utility for materials research. Recent developments in the ICSD, including the expanded representation of coordination polyhedra and improved integration with external data sources, demonstrate how traditional standardization efforts like TYPIX are being extended with modern computational approaches [8]. These advancements create increasingly powerful platforms for materials discovery and characterization.

The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning with standardized structural data represents the next frontier in crystallographic research. As databases incorporate AI-driven features for tasks such as automated indexing and predictive query optimization [68], the foundational work represented by TYPIX becomes even more valuable as training data for these systems. The rigorous standardization and critical evaluation embodied by TYPIX provides the essential groundwork upon which future computational materials design platforms will be built.

In conclusion, the TYPIX database's role in providing standardized, critically evaluated data on inorganic structure types remains fundamentally important in an era of increasingly automated and data-driven materials research. By establishing a consistent framework for structural classification and comparison, TYPIX enables researchers to navigate the vast landscape of inorganic crystal chemistry efficiently. When combined with comprehensive databases like ICSD and modern computational tools, this standardized approach continues to drive innovation across materials science, solid-state chemistry, and related disciplines.

In the field of inorganic crystallography, confirming the novelty of a newly determined crystal structure is a fundamental prerequisite for research publication and intellectual property protection. The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) stands as the world's largest database for completely identified inorganic crystal structures, containing over 240,000 entries with records dating back to 1913 [13]. Each entry undergoes thorough quality checks before inclusion, making ICSD an authoritative resource for structural validation [2]. The challenge for researchers lies in efficiently comparing their experimental unit cell parameters against this comprehensive database early in the research workflow. This technical guide examines the implementation of CellCheckCSD, an automated tool developed by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) that enables researchers to perform reduced cell checks against both the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) and ICSD during data collection [40].

Understanding CellCheckCSD: Capabilities and Integration

CellCheckCSD is a command-line tool specifically designed for performing crystal structure reduced cell checks against major structural databases. Its primary function involves comparing pre-experiment unit cell dimensions against established databases to provide researchers with immediate feedback on potential structural matches [40]. This capability is particularly valuable for ensuring that research efforts are directed toward truly novel compounds rather than redundant determinations. As noted by Dr. Stephan Rühl of FIZ Karlsruhe, "With CellCheckCSD it is possible to easily check whether a crystal structure is already known at a very early stage of crystal structure determination, thus avoiding unnecessary and time-consuming redeterminations of known compounds" [40].

Key Applications in Research Workflows

• Matching known crystal structures: Verification against previously published cell dimensions [40]
• Novelty assessment: Confirmation that new crystal samples represent unpublished structures [40]
• Contamination detection: Identification of accidental crystallization of starting materials or reaction by-products [40]
• Interdisciplinary research: Particularly valuable for researchers in fields like battery or solar cell research who no longer need to check multiple sources separately [40]

System Integration and Availability

CellCheckCSD has been developed for automated use through the Rigaku software package CrysAlisPro, and is also available through the Bruker software suite APEX [40]. The tool is incorporated into International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) journal workflows and represents an optional check in the checkCIF structural validation tool [40]. The software is available for free download after completing a simple registration step, though support may be limited as it is offered as a free service [40].

Database Foundations: ICSD and CSD

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD)

The ICSD represents the most comprehensive collection of inorganic crystal structure data available worldwide. Maintained by FIZ Karlsruhe, the database includes carefully curated structural information with the following characteristics [2] [13]:

Table 1: ICSD Content Overview

Category	Statistics	Content Description
Total Structures	>240,000	Completely identified inorganic crystal structures
Time Coverage	1913 to present	Historical to contemporary structures
Elements	>3,000 structures	Pure elements including metals and minerals
Compound Distribution	>43,000 binary, >79,000 ternary, >85,000 quaternary and quintenary	Comprehensive coverage of compound complexity
Structure Types	~80% allocated to ~9,000 structure types	Enables substance class searches and pattern recognition
Data Sources	>1,600 periodicals	Comprehensive literature coverage

The database includes experimental inorganic structures (both fully characterized and those published with a structure type), metal-organic structures with known inorganic applications or relevant material properties, and theoretical inorganic structures extracted from peer-reviewed journals [13]. This comprehensive coverage ensures that researchers can have high confidence in novelty assessments when no matches are found through CellCheckCSD screening.

Complementary Database: Cambridge Structural Database (CSD)

While the ICSD focuses on inorganic compounds, the Cambridge Structural Database provides complementary coverage of organic and metal-organic structures. The integration of both databases within CellCheckCSD significantly expands its application scope, making it valuable for researchers working across traditional chemical boundaries [40]. The combined access allows for comprehensive novelty assessment without requiring separate queries to multiple database systems.

Experimental Protocols for Cross-Database Validation

Pre-Data Collection Assessment Workflow

The following workflow describes the optimal procedure for implementing CellCheckCSD in a crystallographic research pipeline:

• Crystal Mounting and Initial Characterization: Mount the crystal and perform initial diffraction experiments to determine preliminary unit cell parameters.

• Cell Parameter Extraction: Extract the reduced cell parameters (unit cell dimensions and space group) from the initial diffraction data.

• CellCheckCSD Execution: Input the reduced cell parameters into CellCheckCSD via command-line interface or through integrated software platforms (CrysAlisPro or APEX).

• Result Interpretation:

  • No close matches: Proceed with full data collection
  • Close matches: Analyze potential structural relationships and determine if the structure represents a truly novel compound
  • Exact matches: Identify known structures or potential by-products

• Decision Point: Based on the comparison results, decide whether to proceed with full data collection or redirect research efforts toward truly novel systems.

Figure 1: CellCheckCSD Integration Workflow for Novelty Assessment

Technical Implementation Details

The validation process relies on the mathematical comparison of reduced unit cells, which normalizes cell parameters to a standard setting to enable direct comparison between structures. The algorithm accounts for:

• Crystal system variations: Different settings of the same structure
• Metric symmetry: Identification of potentially higher symmetry
• Cell reduction: Transformation to a standard Niggli cell or similar reduced form
• Tolerance matching: Accounting for experimental uncertainties in cell parameters

The tool provides rapid feedback, with some researchers reporting identification of known compounds "in less than 30 seconds from the shutter opening" [40].

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Cross-Database Validation

Resource	Function	Source/Access
CellCheckCSD	Command-line tool for reduced cell checks against CSD and ICSD	CCDC, free after registration [40]
ICSD Database	Primary reference database for inorganic crystal structures	FIZ Karlsruhe / NIST [2] [69]
CrysAlisPro Software	Commercial crystallography software with integrated CellCheckCSD	Rigaku [40]
APEX Suite	Bruker crystallography software with CellCheckCSD integration	Bruker [40]
checkCIF Service	IUCr structural validation portal incorporating CellCheckCSD	International Union of Crystallography [40]

Significance in Broader ICSD Research Context

The integration of CellCheckCSD into crystallographic research workflows represents a significant advancement in efficiency and standardization for the field. The IUCr notes that "the latest extension of CellCheckCSD now enables robust structural duplication checking for inorganic as well as organic and metal-organic compounds, significantly broadening its scope and applicability" [40]. This development is particularly valuable for:

• Interdisciplinary research: Elimination of the need to check multiple sources separately
• Method standardization: Establishment of consistent validation procedures across research institutions
• Resource optimization: Prevention of redundant structure determinations, saving significant research time and resources
• Data quality improvement: Enhancement of structural database integrity by reducing duplicate entries

The tool's incorporation into publisher validation workflows further strengthens its role in maintaining the quality and novelty of published crystallographic research, serving as a gatekeeper against unintentional redetermination of known structures.

CellCheckCSD provides an essential validation step in modern crystallographic research by enabling early-stage comparison of unit cell parameters against the comprehensive ICSD and CSD databases. Its integration into common instrumentation software platforms and publisher validation workflows makes it accessible to researchers across disciplines. By implementing this tool at the pre-data collection stage, scientists can ensure their research efforts are directed toward truly novel compounds, thereby optimizing resource utilization and contributing to the overall quality of structural science. The continued development and broadening of CellCheckCSD's capabilities represents a significant step toward standardized validation practices in crystallography, with particular value for researchers working at the interdisciplinary boundaries of inorganic chemistry, materials science, and drug development.

The modern drug discovery pipeline relies on a sophisticated ecosystem of chemical and biological databases, each serving a specialized purpose. Within this ecosystem, the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) stands as a unique repository specifically for inorganic materials, distinct from the molecular-focused databases that dominate pharmaceutical research. The ICSD is the world's largest database for completely identified inorganic crystal structures, containing over 307,000 curated entries and growing by approximately 12,000 new structures annually [2] [15]. Its data, which dates back to 1913, undergoes thorough quality checks and includes detailed information such as unit cell parameters, atomic coordinates, and space group data [2].

In contrast, ChEMBL is a manually curated database of bioactive molecules with drug-like properties, focusing on the translation of genomic information into effective new drugs [70] [71]. Its content includes chemical, bioactivity, and genomic data, with recent releases incorporating chemical probe data and anti-SARS-CoV-2 screening results [71]. PubChem, a massive open resource, functions as a comprehensive aggregator of chemical information from hundreds of sources, containing over 95 million distinct chemical structures as of early 2018 [72]. Understanding the complementary strengths and specific applications of these resources is crucial for researchers navigating the complex landscape of drug discovery informatics.

Table 1: Core Characteristics of Major Chemical and Structural Databases

Database	Primary Content Focus	Size (Approx.)	Key Features	Role in Drug Discovery
ICSD	Inorganic crystal structures	>307,000 structures [15]	Manually curated; includes atomic parameters, structure types [2]	Materials science for drug delivery & devices
ChEMBL	Bioactive, drug-like molecules	~1.25 million compounds [73] [71]	Manually curated SAR data, bioactivity assays [70] [74]	Lead identification & optimization
PubChem	Aggregated chemical substances	~95 million structures (2018) [72]	Massive aggregation from 500+ sources [72]	Broad chemical intelligence, vendor sourcing

Comparative Analysis: ICSD vs. Molecular Databases

The divergence between ICSD and molecular databases like ChEMBL and PubChem is fundamental, stemming from their core data types and intended applications. ICSD's value proposition lies in its highly specialized and validated inorganic structural data, which is essential for understanding material properties rather than direct biological activity. The database is characterized by its disciplinary focus, restricted fee-required access, and rigorous quality management processes [15]. Its records are produced from original publications and deposited data, undergoing additional checking to ensure high quality [15].

ChEMBL and PubChem, while both containing chemical structures, are fundamentally different in their curation philosophy and content selection. ChEMBL is highly selective, focusing on molecules with demonstrated drug-like properties and bioactivity, often derived from medicinal chemistry literature and structured activity-relationship (SAR) results [73] [74]. This manual curation makes it particularly valuable for understanding potency, selectivity, and other parameters critical to lead optimization. PubChem operates on an entirely different scale and principle, functioning as a comprehensive aggregator that subsumes data from over 500 sources, including vendor catalogs, patent offices, and other public databases [72]. This results in a vastly larger but less curated collection, where the same compound (e.g., aspirin) may be represented by hundreds of substance identifiers from different submitters [72].

Table 2: Database Content Overlap and Complementarity Analysis

Characteristic	ICSD	ChEMBL	PubChem	DrugBank
Structure Type	Inorganic Crystals	Organic/Drug-like	All types (primarily organic)	Approved/Experimental Drugs
Stereochemistry	Not Applicable (solid-state)	Recorded	Recorded (stringent rules) [72]	Recorded
Primary Curation	Manual quality checks [2]	Manual from literature [74]	Automated merging from sources [72]	Manual from literature
Unique Content	Virtually 100% [15]	High (curated SAR) [73]	Lower (high source overlap) [72]	High (mechanism-of-action focus) [73]
Key Application	Materials Science	Drug Discovery SAR	Broad chemical intelligence	Drug target & mechanism data

A 2013 comparative study of chemical databases highlighted that despite some overlapping content between resources like ChEMBL, DrugBank, and others, each database maintains significant unique content and expanding complementarity due to different curation rules and focus areas [73]. This is equally true for ICSD, which occupies a nearly orthogonal niche to molecular databases. The integration of these resources is not typically direct but occurs through specialized workflows where materials data from ICSD informs auxiliary components of the drug development process.

Integration in the Drug Discovery Pipeline: Workflows and Protocols

The Evolving Drug Discovery Paradigm

Modern drug discovery has progressively shifted from traditional experimental high-throughput screening (HTS) toward more efficient computational and structure-based approaches [75]. Structure-Based Drug Design (SBDD) has become a fundamental part of industrial drug discovery, utilizing three-dimensional structural information of therapeutic targets to identify and optimize lead compounds [75]. This paradigm relies heavily on computational techniques such as structure-based virtual screening (SBVS), molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations [75]. The entire process from target identification to an FDA-approved drug can take up to 14 years at a cost of approximately $800 million, creating strong impetus for computational efficiencies [75].

The growing importance of network-based multi-omics integration represents another significant evolution in drug discovery methodology. By integrating diverse data types including genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics within biological interaction networks, researchers can better predict drug responses, identify novel drug targets, and facilitate drug repurposing [76]. These approaches abstract interactions among various biological omics into network models, which aligns with the fundamental principles of biological systems and has become a key research focus for drug prediction and disease mechanism studies [76].

Diagram 1: Database roles in the drug discovery pipeline. ICSD primarily contributes to preclinical development of drug formulations and delivery systems, while molecular databases support earlier stages of lead discovery and optimization.

Structure-Based Drug Design Protocol

A typical Structure-Based Drug Design workflow integrates multiple database resources in an iterative process [75]:

• Target Identification and Validation: Identify a therapeutically relevant protein target and validate its role in the disease pathway.

• 3D Structure Acquisition: Obtain the three-dimensional structure of the target protein through experimental methods (X-ray crystallography, NMR, cryo-EM) or computational modeling (homology modeling) if experimental structures are unavailable [75]. The Protein Data Bank (PDB) is the primary resource for this step.

• Binding Site Characterization: Identify and characterize the binding pocket using computational tools that analyze interaction energies, van der Waals forces, and probe mapping [75]. Tools like Q-SiteFinder calculate favorable interaction sites with molecular probes [75].

• Virtual Screening: Screen large compound libraries from ChEMBL, PubChem, or commercial vendors against the binding site using molecular docking software. ChEMBL is particularly valuable here due to its curated bioactivity data, which helps prioritize compounds with drug-like properties [75] [74].

• Hit Validation and Optimization: Synthesize and test top-ranked compounds in biochemical assays. Determine the co-crystal structure of target-ligand complexes to guide medicinal chemistry optimization using structural insights from the complex [75].

• Iterative Refinement: Multiple cycles of compound design, synthesis, and testing improve efficacy and specificity before advancing leads to clinical trials [75].

Multi-Omics Integration Protocol for Target Identification

Network-based integration of multi-omics data has emerged as a powerful approach for identifying novel drug targets [76]:

• Data Collection and Preprocessing: Gather diverse omics datasets including genomics (mutations, CNV), transcriptomics (gene expression), epigenomics (DNA methylation), and proteomics data. Quality control and normalize each dataset separately.

• Biological Network Construction: Build relevant biological networks such as protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, gene regulatory networks (GRNs), or metabolic reaction networks (MRNs) using established databases and computational predictions [76].

• Data Integration: Employ network-based integration methods such as network propagation/diffusion, similarity-based approaches, graph neural networks, or network inference models to map multi-omics data onto the biological networks [76].

• Prioritization of Candidate Targets: Identify key nodes (proteins/genes) within the integrated network that show significant alterations across multiple omics layers and occupy strategic positions in disease-associated pathways [76].

• Experimental Validation: Validate top candidates using in vitro and in vivo models to confirm their functional role in disease mechanisms and therapeutic potential [76].

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Database-Driven Drug Discovery

Tool/Resource	Function	Application Context
CSD-CrossMiner	Pharmacophore-based searching across CSD, PDB, and in-house databases [77]	Identifying bioisosteric replacements & scaffold hopping in lead optimization
IsoStar/SuperStar	Knowledge-based libraries of intermolecular interactions & pharmacophore prediction [77]	Validating docking poses & understanding binding site interactions
Mogul	Accesses molecular geometry data from CSD for conformation analysis [77]	Assessing ligand strain energy & validating experimental structures
GOLD	Protein-ligand docking program leveraging CSD interaction data [77]	Predicting binding modes in virtual screening
CSD-Conformer Generator	Generates possible solid forms & conformations using CSD distribution data [77]	Assessing conformational preferences & polymorph screening
Network Propagation Algorithms	Diffuses omics signals through biological networks [76]	Identifying novel drug targets from multi-omics data
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)	Learns complex patterns from network-structured data [76]	Predicting drug response & drug-target interactions

The strategic integration of specialized databases creates a powerful synergy that accelerates drug discovery. While ICSD, ChEMBL, and PubChem serve distinct primary functions, their combined utilization addresses the multifaceted challenges of modern pharmaceutical development. ICSD provides fundamental materials science intelligence crucial for formulation and delivery systems, representing the materials informatics foundation. ChEMBL delivers curated bioactivity data essential for understanding structure-activity relationships and optimizing lead compounds, forming the medicinal chemistry core. PubChem offers comprehensive chemical intelligence and sourcing information, serving as the chemical supply infrastructure. Emerging approaches that integrate multi-omics data with biological networks further enhance this ecosystem by enabling more predictive models of drug response and novel target identification [76].

Future developments will likely focus on overcoming current challenges in computational scalability, data integration standardization, and biological interpretability of complex models [76]. The incorporation of temporal and spatial dynamics into network models, along with improved artificial intelligence approaches for data fusion, will further strengthen the role of structured databases in the drug discovery pipeline. As these resources continue to evolve, their strategic integration will remain fundamental to translating basic research into effective therapeutics.

Conclusion

The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) is a dynamic and critical resource, continuously evolving with new features like the 2025 enhancements for coordination polyhedra and mineral standardization. Its integration with tools like the CSD and the growing inclusion of high-quality theoretical data empower researchers to not only understand existing materials but also to predict and design new ones. For drug development, the ability to access well-curated inorganic structures supports excipient design, understanding metal-based drug interactions, and materials for drug delivery systems. Future directions point towards deeper AI-driven analysis, more seamless database interoperability, and an expanded role for computational predictions in de-risking and accelerating the discovery of next-generation materials and therapeutics.

References

• 1. About ICSD | ICSD [https://icsd.products.fiz-karlsruhe.de/en/about/about-icsd]
• 2. Home | ICSD [https://icsd.products.fiz-karlsruhe.de/]
• 3. Inorganic Crystal Structure Database – ICSD | FIZ Karlsruhe [https://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/en/produkte-und-dienstleistungen/inorganic-crystal-structure-database-icsd]
• 4. National Institute of Standards and Technology - FIZ/NIST Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) - SRD 84 [https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/fiz-nist-inorganic-crystal-structure-database-icsd-srd-84-7ba20]
• 5. Introduction [https://icsd.nist.gov/intro.html]
• 6. New developments in the Inorganic ... Crystal Structure Database [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12037357/]
• 7. Home - Inorganic Crystal Structure Database - LibGuides at MIT Libraries [https://libguides.mit.edu/icsd-mit]
• 8. New ICSD Scientific Manual 2025 – an insight into the... | FIZ Karlsruhe [https://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/en/nachricht/neues-icsd-scientific-manual-2025-einblick-die-weltweit-groesste-datenbank-fuer]
• 9. - Wikipedia Inorganic Crystal Structure Database [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inorganic_Crystal_Structure_Database]
• 10. Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) | Physical Sciences Data science Service [https://www.psds.ac.uk/icsd]
• 11. Some examples of how to use theoretical crystal structure data in the ICSD | ICSD [https://icsd.products.fiz-karlsruhe.de/en/howuse/some-examples-how-use-theoretical-crystal-structure-data-icsd]
• 12. Recent developments in the Inorganic ... | CoLab Crystal Structure [https://colab.ws/articles/10.1107%2Fs160057671900997x]
• 13. ( Inorganic ) | Physical Sciences... Crystal Structure Database ICSD [https://psds.ac.uk/icsd]
• 14. National Institute of Standards and Technology - NIST Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) [https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/nist-inorganic-crystal-structure-database-icsd-6997c]
• 15. | re3 Inorganic .org Crystal Structure Database data [https://www.re3data.org/repository/r3d100010085]
• 16. Nondestructive Evaluation Physics : Materials [https://www.nde-ed.org/Physics/Materials/Structure/ceramic.xhtml]
• 17. Mineralogical Society of America - The American Mineralogist Crystal Structure Database [http://www.minsocam.org/msa/crystal_database.html]
• 18. Essential tools for developing new functional materials... | ICSD [https://icsd.products.fiz-karlsruhe.de/howuse/essential-tools-developing-new-functional-materials-recommended-rietveld-analysis-master]
• 19. | 97 Publications | 1339 Citations Inorganic Crystal Structure Database [https://scispace.com/topics/inorganic-crystal-structure-database-3k2e13v6]
• 20. Scientific Manual New – an insight into the... | ICSD 2025 ICSD [https://icsd.products.fiz-karlsruhe.de/en/nachricht/new-icsd-scientific-manual-2025-insight-worlds-largest-database-inorganic-crystal]
• 21. (IUCr) New developments in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD): accessibility in support of materials research and design [https://journals.iucr.org/paper?S0108768102006948]
• 22. Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) and Standardized Data and Crystal Chemical Characterization of Inorganic Structure Types (TYPIX)—Two Tools for Inorganic Chemists and Crystallographers - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4894608/]
• 23. NIST ICSD Web Site [https://icsd.nist.gov]
• 24. News | ICSD ICSD [https://icsd.products.fiz-karlsruhe.de/en/aktuelles/icsd-news]
• 25. NIST Standard Reference Database 3 | NIST [https://www.nist.gov/srd/nist-standard-reference-database-3]
• 26. [2506.12557] Language Models Enable Data -Augmented Synthesis ... [https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12557]
• 27. Chapter 5: ANOVA — Comparing More than Two Groups with... [https://wisc.pb.unizin.org/biocorestatistics/chapter/statistical-inference-comparing-more-than-2-groups/]
• 28. A Graphical Framework for Specification of Clinical Guidelines at Multiple Representation Levels - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1560835/]
• 29. Coordination Polyhedron [https://unacademy.com/content/jee/study-material/chemistry/coordination-polyhedron/]
• 30. Extended symbols of coordination in polyhedra | ICSD ICSD [https://icsd.products.fiz-karlsruhe.de/howuse/extended-symbols-coordination-polyhedra-icsd]
• 31. X-Ray Crystallography - Software - James Tarpo Jr. and Margaret Tarpo Department of Chemistry - Purdue University [https://www.chem.purdue.edu/xray/software.html]
• 32. (IUCr) Completion of crystal structures from powder data: the use of the coordination polyhedra [https://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?buy=yes&cnor=zm0079&showscheme=yes&sing=yes]
• 33. An open experimental database for exploring inorganic materials | Scientific Data [https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201853]
• 34. Inorganic Material Database (AtomWork) - DICE :: National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS) [https://crystdb.nims.go.jp/]
• 35. China overcomes key barriers to unlocking all-solid-state EV batteries with 1,000 km range [https://electrek.co/2025/10/16/china-advances-all-solid-state-ev-batteries-with-1000-km-range/]
• 36. Frontiers | Zn-Based Rechargeable Batteries : Materials , Mechanisms... [https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/12387/zn-based-rechargeable-batteries-materials-mechanisms-and-applications]
• 37. Chery announces breakthrough in solid-state battery development - electrive.com [https://www.electrive.com/2025/10/20/chery-announces-breakthrough-in-solid-state-battery-development/]
• 38. Solid-State and Polymer Batteries 2025-2035: Technology, Forecasts, Players: IDTechEx [https://www.idtechex.com/en/research-report/solid-state-and-polymer-batteries-2025/1070]
• 39. and Electrochemistry: Present and Future Materials Battery [https://www.jecst.org/journal/view.php?number=55&viewtype=pubreader]
• 40. Reduced Cell Checking Crystal | CCDC Structure Tool [https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/solutions/software/cellcheckcsd/]
• 41. Deposit a structure in the CSD for safe, funding compliant, accessible... [https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/community/access-deposit-structures/deposit-a-structure/]
• 42. Crystal Structure Database [https://csd-web.ru/]
• 43. CSD / ICSD | NFDI4Chem Knowledge Base [https://knowledgebase.nfdi4chem.de/knowledge_base/docs/csd_icsd/]
• 44. The crystal depot | structure ICSD [https://icsd.products.fiz-karlsruhe.de/en/crystalstructure/crystal-structure-depot]
• 45. of Deposition data crystal in the structure – Deutsche... sets ICSD [https://dgk-home.de/en/deposit_crystal_structure_data_sets_in_icsd_en/]
• 46. Crystallography [https://rd-alliance.github.io/metadata-directory/subjects/crystallography.html]
• 47. (IUCr) Crystallographic Information Framework [https://www.iucr.org/resources/cif]
• 48. checkCIF validation ALERTS: what they mean and how to respond - PMC [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6944088/]
• 49. Check and Edit Crystallographic Information Files with | CCDC [https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/solutions/software/encifer/]
• 50. (IUCr) CIF applications. XV. enCIFer : a program for viewing, editing... [https://journals.iucr.org/j/issues/2004/02/00/he5290/]
• 51. CheckCIF [https://checkcif.iucr.org/]
• 52. (IUCr) Single-crystal structure validation with the program PLATON [https://journals.iucr.org/j/issues/2003/01/00/os0104/index.html]
• 53. checkCIF validation ALERTS: what they mean and how to respond - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31921444/]
• 54. Resources about Crystallography [https://imserc.northwestern.edu/crystallography-resources.html]
• 55. Recent developments in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database: theoretical crystal structure data and related features - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6782081/]
• 56. The wrong space type given by spglib. · spglib spglib... group [https://github.com/spglib/spglib/discussions/514]
• 57. [ase-users] Inconsistent space determination for... group [https://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/pipermail/ase-users/2024-July/006431.html]
• 58. When Is Inorganic Data Transferred from CCDC to ICSD ? [https://support.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/support/solutions/articles/103000306404-when-is-inorganic-data-deposited-at-the-ccdc-transferred-to-the-icsd-]
• 59. About – CoreTrustSeal [https://www.coretrustseal.org/about/]
• 60. | Data curation ICSD [https://icsd.products.fiz-karlsruhe.de/en/about/data-curation]
• 61. Access & Deposit Crystal | CCDC Structures [https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/community/access-deposit-structures/]
• 62. Accessing ICSD via the CCDC's Access... : CCDC Home data [https://support.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/support/solutions/articles/103000306085-can-i-access-inorganic-icsd-data-through-the-csd-portfolio-]
• 63. Programmatically Access Crystal Structure Data | CCDC [https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/solutions/software/csd-python/]
• 64. (IUCr) Recent developments in the Inorganic ... Crystal Structure [https://journals.iucr.org/j/issues/2019/05/00/in5024/]
• 65. Standardized TYPIX and Data Chemical... | SpringerLink Crystal [https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-10644-0]
• 66. - ICSD - Maastricht University... Inorganic Crystal Structure Database [https://library.maastrichtuniversity.nl/database/icsd/]
• 67. Structural Chemistry Data, Software, and Insights | CCDC [https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/]
• 68. Top 10 Most Popular Databases Use in 2025 | Zuci Systems [https://www.zucisystems.com/blog/most-popular-databases/]
• 69. Online access to the Inorganic (SRD3) Crystal Structure Database [https://icsd.nist.gov/]
• 70. - ChEMBL ChEMBL [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/]
• 71. The ChEMBL in 2023: a Database platform spanning... drug discovery [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37933841/]
• 72. Caveat Usor: Assessing Differences between Major Chemistry Databases - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5900829/]
• 73. Comparing the Chemical Structure and Protein Content of ChEMBL, DrugBank, Human Metabolome Database and the Therapeutic Target Database - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3916886/]
• 74. Dealing with the Data Deluge: Handling the Multitude Of Chemical Biology Data Sources - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4655879/]
• 75. A Structure -Based Drug Paradigm - PMC Discovery [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6601033/]
• 76. Network-based multi-omics integrative analysis methods in drug ... [https://biodatamining.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13040-025-00442-z]
• 77. Using Crystallographic Structures and Data -Driven Solutions... | CCDC [https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/discover/blog/using-crystallographic-structures-and-data-driven-solutions-to-advance-drug-design/]