Beyond Temperature: A Thermodynamic Framework for Synthesizing Advanced High-Entropy Oxides

Abstract

This article explores the paradigm shift in high-entropy oxide (HEO) synthesis from a purely temperature-centric approach to a multidimensional thermodynamic strategy. We delve into how controlling the oxygen chemical potential, rather than just temperature, is a decisive factor for stabilizing single-phase HEOs, particularly for compositions incorporating multivalent cations like Mn and Fe. Covering foundational principles, modern synthesis methodologies, and optimization techniques, this review provides a comprehensive guide for researchers aiming to design novel HEOs. We also examine the critical impact of synthesis routes on material properties and present validation frameworks to assess phase purity and local structure, concluding with the future implications of these advanced materials for energy and biomedical applications.

The Thermodynamic Principles Governing High-Entropy Oxide Stability

Revisiting the Role of Configurational Entropy in HEO Stabilization

The discovery of high-entropy oxides (HEOs) has introduced a transformative paradigm in ceramics science, moving beyond traditional one- or two-principal-element designs to incorporate multiple cations in near-equimolar ratios. Initially, the exceptional stability of these single-phase solid solutions was primarily attributed to the high configurational entropy arising from cation disorder. However, contemporary research within the framework of thermodynamics-inspired synthesis reveals a more complex reality where configurational entropy, while critical, functions within a multidimensional thermodynamic landscape [1] [2]. This Application Note revisits the role of configurational entropy, placing it in the context of other vital thermodynamic and kinetic factors. We provide a detailed protocol for a thermodynamics-inspired synthesis strategy that successfully incorporates challenging multivalent cations like Mn and Fe into rock salt HEOs by explicitly controlling the oxygen chemical potential (pO₂), a previously underutilized thermodynamic axis [1]. This approach, complemented by advanced computational screening, enables the targeted stabilization of a broader range of HEO compositions with emergent functionalities in energy storage, catalysis, and electronics.

Core Concepts: Reconciling Entropy with Enthalpy and Oxygen Potential

The stabilization of HEOs is governed by the minimization of the Gibbs free energy, ΔG = ΔH - TΔS. While a high configurational entropy (ΔS) favors mixing, the enthalpic contribution (ΔH) and synthesis conditions can present significant barriers [1] [2].

• Configurational Entropy: The ideal configurational entropy for an equimolar solid solution with N cation species is given by ΔS = -RΣxᵢln(xᵢ), where R is the gas constant and xᵢ is the mole fraction of cation i. For a 5-component HEO, this provides a significant stabilizing drive at elevated temperatures [2].
• Enthalpic Stability: A low or negative enthalpy of mixing (ΔH) is equally crucial. Descriptors such as mixing enthalpy (ΔHₘᵢₓ) and bond length distribution (σᵦₒₙdₛ) effectively predict stability; low values indicate minimal lattice distortion and a favorable enthalpic landscape for single-phase formation [1] [3].
• The Critical Role of Oxygen Chemical Potential: For cations with multiple stable oxidation states (e.g., Mn, Fe), the oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) during synthesis is a decisive factor. The thermodynamic stability of a single-phase HEO requires an overlap in the pO₂–T regions where all constituent cations exist in a compatible oxidation state [1]. Table 1 summarizes key thermodynamic descriptors for HEO stability.

Table 1: Key Thermodynamic and Descriptor Analysis for HEO Stabilization

Descriptor	Description	Interpretation for HEO Stability	Relevant HEO System
Configurational Entropy (ΔS)	Entropy from random mixing of cations on a lattice site [2].	Higher values stabilize solid solutions at high temperatures. Not a sole guarantee.	All HEOs
Mixing Enthalpy (ΔHₘᵢₓ)	Energy change upon mixing binary oxides into a solid solution [1] [3].	Low or negative values favor single-phase formation.	Rock salt, Spinel
Bond Length Distribution (σᵦₒₙdₛ)	Standard deviation of relaxed cation-anion bond lengths [1] [3].	Lower values indicate less lattice strain and higher stability.	Rock salt
Oxygen Chemical Potential Overlap	pO₂-T region where all cations share a common, stable oxidation state [1].	A key predictor of synthesizability for multivalent cations.	Rock salt (Mn,Fe-containing)
Covalent Radius Range (Δr)	Difference between max and min Pyykkö's covalent radii in a composition [4].	< ~30 pm favors single-phase rock salt or spinel by reducing strain.	Rock salt, Spinel

The following workflow integrates computational and thermodynamic analysis to identify synthesizable HEO compositions.

Diagram 1: Integrated computational and thermodynamic workflow for HEO discovery. The process progresses from initial screening to targeted synthesis based on oxygen potential control.

Experimental Protocol: Thermodynamics-Inspired Synthesis of Mn/Fe-Containing Rock Salt HEOs

This protocol details the synthesis of single-phase rock salt HEOs containing multivalent cations (e.g., Mn, Fe) by controlling oxygen chemical potential to coerce cations into the 2+ oxidation state [1].

Materials and Equipment

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Equipment

Item Name	Function/Description	Critical Parameters/Notes
Metal Oxide Precursors	High-purity (>99.9%) MgO, CoO, NiO, MnO₂, Fe₂O₃, etc.	Source of cationic components. Particle size < 44 µm recommended.
Argon Gas Flow System	Creates a controlled, low-oxygen atmosphere during sintering.	High-purity Ar (≥ 99.998%). Continuous flow rate of ~100-200 mL/min.
Tube Furnace	High-temperature sintering.	Must withstand temperatures up to 1000-1100°C and allow gas flow.
Ball Mill	Homogenization of precursor oxide powder mixture.	Uses zirconia balls, wet milling with ethanol for 12-24 hours.
Hydraulic Press	Pelletization of powder mixture.	Apply uniaxial pressure of ~100-300 MPa to form dense pellets.
X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)	Phase identification and confirmation of single-phase formation.	Check for pure rock salt structure without secondary phases.
X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS)	Determination of local cation coordination and oxidation states.	Confirms predominantly divalent state of Mn and Fe.

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Powder Mixture Preparation

  • Weigh high-purity metal oxide precursors in the desired equimolar cation ratios (e.g., for a 5-cation HEO, use a 1:1:1:1:1 molar ratio of cations).
  • Transfer the powder mixture to a ball mill jar with zirconia grinding media and ethanol.
  • Mill for 12-24 hours to ensure thorough mixing and reduce particle size.

• Pelletization

  • Dry the homogenized powder in an oven at ~80°C.
  • Place the dried powder into a cylindrical die and compress using a hydraulic press at a uniaxial pressure of 100-300 MPa to form dense, coherent pellets.

• High-Temperature Synthesis under Controlled pO₂

  • Place the pellets in an alumina boat and load them into a tube furnace.
  • Seal the furnace and purge the chamber with high-purity argon gas for at least 30 minutes to remove residual oxygen.
  • Initiate the heating ramp (~5°C/min) to the target synthesis temperature (e.g., 1000°C) under a continuous argon flow of 100-200 mL/min. This gas flow maintains a low oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) critical for stabilizing Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺.
  • Hold the temperature for 10-24 hours for complete reaction and homogenization.

• Post-Synthesis Processing

  • After the dwell time, turn off the furnace and allow the samples to cool naturally to room temperature under continuous argon flow. This step is critical to prevent re-oxidation of the cations during cooling.
  • Retrieve the pellets for characterization.

The success of this protocol hinges on maintaining low pO₂, as illustrated in the thermodynamic decision tree below.

Diagram 2: Thermodynamic decision tree for selecting synthesis conditions based on target HEO composition. Region 1 stabilizes prototypical (Mg,Co,Ni,Cu,Zn)O, while Regions 2 and 3 are required for Mn/Fe-containing compositions without Cu [1].

Characterization and Validation

• X-ray Diffraction (XRD): Confirm single-phase rock salt structure. The pattern should show characteristic (111), (200), (220), etc., peaks with no evidence of secondary phases.
• X-ray Fluorescence (XRF): Verify the final bulk composition is close to the nominal equimolar design.
• Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS): Map element distribution to confirm homogeneous cation distribution at the micro-scale.
• X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS): Analyze the local coordination and oxidation states of cations. For a successful synthesis, Mn and Fe K-edge spectra will indicate a predominantly divalent state, confirming the efficacy of the pO₂ control [1].

Application in Energy Storage: A Data-Driven Case Study

The principles of entropy stabilization and controlled synthesis enable the design of HEOs for specific applications, such as cobalt-free anodes for lithium-ion batteries. A recent data-driven study [4] highlights this approach.

• Objective: To synthesize a high-performance, cobalt-free spinel HEO anode.
• Data-Driven Composition Selection: A machine learning model, trained on a dataset of 269 synthesized five-element combinations, identified that single-phase spinel or rock salt HEOs form preferentially when the range of Pyykkö’s covalent radius is below 30 and the range of atomic weight is below 59 [4].
• Selected Composition: Guided by these criteria, the (Ti₀.₂Mn₀.₂Ni₀.₂Cu₀.₂Zn₀.₂)₃O₄ composition was selected. Its covalent radius range (26) and atomic weight range (47) fell within the stable regions.
• Validation: XRD confirmed the successful synthesis of a single-phase spinel structure. Electrochemical tests demonstrated high reversible capacity and outstanding cycling stability, validating the design strategy [4].

The stabilization of HEOs is a multifaceted phenomenon where configurational entropy is a powerful but not solitary driver. A modern, thermodynamics-inspired synthesis strategy must integrate computational stability descriptors with active control of thermodynamic parameters, most notably the oxygen chemical potential. The protocol outlined herein provides a robust and adaptable framework for the rational design and synthesis of novel HEOs, particularly those containing challenging multivalent cations, thereby accelerating the discovery of next-generation materials for energy and catalytic applications.

The Critical Role of Oxygen Chemical Potential as a Key Thermodynamic Variable

The synthesis of complex metal oxides, particularly high-entropy oxides (HEOs), has traditionally focused on high-temperature processing to maximize the stabilizing role of configurational entropy. However, temperature represents only one dimension of the thermodynamic landscape. This Application Note establishes oxygen chemical potential (μO₂) as a critical, independent thermodynamic variable that dictates phase stability and cation valence in oxide systems. By explicitly controlling μO₂, researchers can transcend traditional synthesis limitations, enabling the stabilization of novel single-phase HEOs containing multivalent cations that are inaccessible under ambient conditions [1] [5]. The principles outlined herein provide a adaptable framework for the thermodynamics-inspired synthesis of advanced ceramic materials.

Theoretical Foundation

The chemical potential (μi) of a species is defined as the change in the free energy of a thermodynamic system with respect to the change in the number of particles of that species. For a species i, it is the partial molar Gibbs free energy at constant temperature and pressure [6]: μi = (∂G/∂Ni)T,P,Nj≠i

In the context of oxide synthesis, the oxygen chemical potential (μO₂) quantifies the thermodynamic driving force for the oxidation or reduction of metal cations. It is intrinsically linked to the oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) in the surrounding gas atmosphere and temperature (T). The fundamental relationship is: μO₂ = μ°O₂ + RT ln(pO₂/p°) where μ°O₂ is the standard chemical potential, R is the gas constant, and p° is the standard pressure (1 bar) [7].

Particles naturally move from regions of higher chemical potential to lower chemical potential to minimize the system's free energy [6]. During HEO synthesis, this principle allows a precisely controlled pO₂ to coax multivalent cations into a target oxidation state, thereby enabling their incorporation into a single-phase crystal structure.

Application in High-Entropy Oxide Synthesis

The Challenge of Multivalent Cations

The prototypical rock salt HEO (MgCoNiCuZn)O is stabilized under ambient pO₂ at high temperatures because all its constituent cations (Mg²⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Cu²⁺, Zn²⁺) are stable in the 2+ oxidation state within this "valence stability window" [1]. Incorporating other desirable transition metals like Manganese (Mn) and Iron (Fe) is challenging because they readily form higher oxides (e.g., MnO₂, Mn₂O₃, Fe₂O₃) under ambient conditions. This valence incompatibility prevents single-phase rock salt formation under conventional synthesis [1].

Oxygen Chemical Potential as a Solution

The key to incorporating Mn and Fe is to suppress their inherent multivalency by synthesizing the HEO under a low pO₂ atmosphere. This manipulation of μO₂ shifts the system's thermodynamics into a different region of the T-pO₂ phase diagram where the 2+ oxidation state of both Mn and Fe becomes stable, creating a new "valence stability window" [1]. The required pO₂ for this stabilization is experimentally accessible through the use of a continuous inert gas flow (e.g., Argon) or other reducing atmospheres [1] [8].

Table 1: Cation Valence States Under Different Oxygen Chemical Potential Regions for Rock Salt HEO Synthesis

Cation	Typical Stable Oxidation States	Valence in Region 1 (High pO₂)	Valence in Region 2 (Medium pO₂)	Valence in Region 3 (Low pO₂)
Mg	+2	+2	+2	+2
Co	+2, +3	+2	+2	+2
Ni	+2	+2	+2	+2
Cu	+1, +2	+2	Metallic	Metallic
Zn	+2	+2	+2	+2
Mn	+2, +3, +4	+4	+2	+2
Fe	+2, +3	+3	+3	+2

Data adapted from thermodynamic analysis in [1].

Predicting Synthesizability: Valence Phase Diagrams

A critical advancement is the construction of a Valence Phase Diagram based on preferred cation oxidation states as a function of temperature and oxygen partial pressure [1]. This diagram allows researchers to identify "overlap" regions where all desired cations in a target HEO composition share a common, compatible oxidation state (typically 2+ for rock salt). The existence of such an overlap region is a powerful descriptor for predicting the synthesizability of a single-phase HEO.

Diagram 1: Valence windows enable novel HEO synthesis.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Solid-State Synthesis of Rock Salt HEOs Under Controlled μO₂

This protocol details the synthesis of a novel five-component (MgCoNiMnFe)O HEO via a solid-state reaction under controlled oxygen chemical potential [1] [8].

Materials and Equipment

• Precursor Oxides: MgO, CoO, NiO, MnO₂, Fe₂O₃ (high purity ≥99.9%).
• Milling Media: Zirconia or alumina balls.
• Milling Vessel: High-density polyethylene or agate jar.
• Furnace: High-temperature tube furnace capable of sustained operation up to 1200°C.
• Atmosphere Control: Gas flow system for Argon (Ar) or Ar/H₂ mixtures.
• Pressing Die: Uniaxial or isostatic press.

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Weighing: Accurately weigh equimolar quantities (e.g., 0.2 mol each) of the precursor oxides to achieve the desired cation stoichiometry.
• Mixing: Transfer the powder mixture and milling media into the milling jar. Add a dispersant (e.g., ethanol or isopropanol) to form a slurry. Mill for 12-24 hours to ensure homogeneity at the molecular level.
• Drying: Dry the resulting slurry in an oven at 80-100°C to evaporate the solvent.
• Calcination (Optional): The dried powder may be lightly calcined (~800°C, 1-2 hours) in air to pre-react some components.
• Pelletization: Press the powder into dense pellets (e.g., 10-12 mm diameter) using a uniaxial press at a pressure of 200-400 MPa.
• High-Temperature Reaction:
  • Place the pellets in an alumina boat and load them into the tube furnace.
  • Seal the furnace and purge with inert gas (e.g., Argon) for at least 30 minutes to remove residual oxygen.
  • Initiate the heating ramp (3-5°C/min) to the target synthesis temperature (e.g., 1000-1100°C) under a continuous Ar flow (e.g., 100-200 sccm). This gas flow maintains a low pO₂ (~10⁻¹⁵ to 10⁻²² bar) throughout the reaction.
  • Hold at the peak temperature for 4-8 hours to ensure complete reaction and homogenization.
• Quenching: After the dwell time, rapidly quench the pellets to room temperature by quickly removing them from the hot zone of the furnace under continued gas flow. This preserves the high-temperature single phase.
• Characterization: Analyze the resulting material by X-ray Diffraction (XRD) to confirm single-phase rock salt formation and Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS) to verify homogeneous cation distribution [1] [5].

Table 2: Key Synthesis Parameters for Different Target Compositions

Target HEO Composition	Recommended Synthesis Temperature	Required Atmosphere	Key Cation Valence Control	Expected Phase Outcome
(MgCoNiCuZn)O	875-950°C	Ambient Air (pO₂ ≈ 0.21 bar)	Cu²⁺ stability	Single-Phase Rock Salt
(MgCoNiMnZn)O	1000-1100°C	Flowing Argon (Low pO₂)	Reduction of Mn⁴⁺/Mn³⁺ to Mn²⁺	Single-Phase Rock Salt
(MgCoNiMnFe)O	1000-1100°C	Flowing Argon (Very Low pO₂)	Reduction of Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ and Mn⁴⁺/Mn³⁺ to Mn²⁺	Single-Phase Rock Salt
(MgCoNiCuMnFe)O	Not Recommended	N/A	Incompatible valence states of Cu and Mn/Fe	Multi-Phase

Synthesis parameters derived from [1].

Diagram 2: HEO synthesis workflow under controlled μO₂.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials and Reagents for HEO Synthesis via Oxygen Potential Control

Item Name	Function / Application	Critical Notes
High-Purity Precursor Oxides/Carbonates	Source of metal cations for the HEO composition.	Use ≥99.9% purity to avoid unintended dopants. Carbonates can be decomposed in-situ to form reactive oxides.
Inert Atmosphere Furnace	Provides the high-temperature environment with controlled gas composition.	Must be capable of precise temperature control and sustaining a continuous, pure inert gas flow (Ar, N₂).
Ultra-High Purity Argon Gas	Creates a low pO₂ environment during synthesis.	Gas purity is critical; even trace O₂ can shift the μO₂ and prevent reduction of multivalent cations.
Zirconia Milling Media	For mechanical homogenization of precursor powders.	Prevents contamination during the extended milling process.
X-Ray Diffractometer (XRD)	Primary tool for confirming single-phase crystal structure formation.	Look for a single set of diffraction peaks corresponding to the target structure (e.g., rock salt).
X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS)	Probes the local electronic structure and oxidation state of cations.	Essential for verifying the successful reduction of Mn and Fe to the 2+ state [1] [5].

Moving beyond a purely temperature-centric view of synthesis unlocks new frontiers in materials design. The deliberate and precise control of oxygen chemical potential is a powerful, thermodynamics-inspired strategy for expanding the compositional space of high-entropy oxides. By applying the Valence Phase Diagram concept and the detailed protocols provided, researchers can systematically design and synthesize novel single-phase HEOs with tailored compositions and properties, paving the way for advancements in catalysis, energy storage, and beyond.

Core Thermodynamic Principles in High-Entropy Oxides

The synthesis and stabilization of high-entropy oxides (HEOs) are governed by the fundamental competition between enthalpy and entropy, as defined by the Gibbs free energy of mixing, ΔGmix = ΔHmix - TΔSmix [9]. In this equation, a sufficiently high configurational entropy (ΔSmix) can stabilize a single-phase solid solution, even in the presence of an unfavorable, positive enthalpy of mixing (ΔHmix), by making ΔGmix negative at elevated temperatures [10] [9].

The mixing enthalpy (ΔHmix) represents the enthalpic barrier to forming a single-phase solid solution and originates from the energy differences associated with the formation of new chemical bonds between dissimilar cations and the accompanying structural changes [1] [9]. Lattice distortion is a direct consequence of mixing cations with different ionic radii within a shared crystal lattice, leading to local atomic displacements and strain [10] [11]. This distortion is a key contributor to a positive ΔHmix and can be quantified by the standard deviation of the cation-anion bond lengths (σbonds) [1]. The interplay between these two enthalpic contributions significantly influences the phase stability, synthesizability, and functional properties of HEOs [10] [11].

Quantitative Data on Enthalpic Parameters

Table 1: Experimentally Determined and Calculated Enthalpic Parameters for Select HEO Compositions

Material Composition	Crystal Structure	Mixing Enthalpy (ΔHmix)	Lattice Distortion (σbonds)	Key Findings
(Co, Cu, Mg, Ni)O [10]	Rocksalt	Positive (low values)	Quantified via cation-anion distance analysis	Low enthalpy of mixing promotes stability; Jahn-Teller distortion from Cu²⁺ observed.
(Co, Mg, Ni, Zn)O [10]	Rocksalt	Positive (low values)	Quantified via cation-anion distance analysis	Favorable enthalpic profile for solid solution formation.
(Ca, Co, Cu, Ni, Zn)O [10]	Rocksalt	Large Positive	N/A	High positive enthalpy suggests segregation tendency, limiting stability.
(Co0.2Ni0.2Mn0.2Cu0.2Zn0.2)3O4 [11]	Spinel	N/A	Significant (shortened metal-O bonds)	Lattice distortion enhances stability and catalytic activity in PMS activation.
MgCoNiMnFeO [1]	Rocksalt	Low (per stability map)	Low (per stability map)	Identified as a promising composition based on atomistically calculated stability map.

Table 2: Thermodynamic Parameter Ranges for Solid Solution Prediction

The following parameters, often derived from studies on high-entropy alloys, provide guidelines for predicting single-phase solid solution formation [12].

Parameter	Definition	Target Range for Solid Solution
δ (Atomic Size Difference)	(\delta = \sqrt{\sum{i=1}^{n} xi \left(1 - \frac{r_i}{\bar{r}}\right)^2 })	δ ≤ 6.6%
ΔHmix (Mixing Enthalpy)	(\Delta H{mix} = \sum{i=1, j \neq i}^{n} \Omega{ij} xi x_j)	-15 kJ/mol < ΔHmix ≤ 5 kJ/mol
Ω (Entropy-Enthalpy Balance)	(\Omega = \frac{Tm \Delta S{mix}}{	\Delta H_{mix}	})	Ω ≥ 1.1

Experimental Protocols for Enthalpy and Distortion Analysis

Protocol: Atomistic Sampling of Configurational Landscape

This protocol, adapted from classical simulation studies, is used to calculate thermodynamic properties and quantify lattice distortion [10].

1. Objective: To extensively sample the configurational energy landscape of a multi-component oxide solid solution to determine its thermodynamic stability and degree of lattice distortion.

2. Reagents and Materials:

• Software: GULP code or equivalent for classical simulations [10].
• Interatomic Potentials: Born model potentials with formal ionic charges (e.g., +2e for cations, -2e for O²⁻) [10].

3. Methodology:

• Cell Construction: Build a supercell (e.g., containing 1000 cations and 1000 anions) based on the parent crystal structure (e.g., rocksalt) [10].
• Configurational Sampling:
  • Random Sampling: Generate a large set of random cation distributions.
  • Genetic Algorithm Sampling: Use an evolutionary approach to efficiently locate low-energy configurations [10].
• Geometry Optimization: For each sampled configuration, perform a full geometry optimization, relaxing both ionic positions and cell parameters [10].
• Data Collection:
  • Energetics: Calculate the enthalpy for each optimized configuration.
  • Structural Analysis: Perform a distance analysis on all cation-cation and cation-anion pairs to quantify local bond length variations and lattice distortion [10].

4. Data Analysis:

• Analyze the distribution of enthalpies of mixing to assess phase stability.
• Quantify lattice distortion by calculating the standard deviation of first-neighbor cation-anion bond lengths (σbonds) [1].

Protocol: Controlled Oxygen Chemical Potential Synthesis

This protocol outlines a thermodynamics-inspired method to synthesize HEOs containing multivalent cations by controlling the oxygen partial pressure during processing [1] [5].

1. Objective: To synthesize single-phase rock salt HEOs incorporating multivalent cations (e.g., Mn, Fe) by coercing them into a divalent state via control of the oxygen chemical potential.

2. Reagents and Materials:

• Precursors: High-purity binary oxide powders (e.g., MgO, CoO, NiO, MnO₂, Fe₂O₃, ZnO) [1].
• Equipment: Tube furnace with controlled atmosphere capabilities.
• Gas Supply: High-purity Argon gas for maintaining a low pO₂ environment [1].

3. Methodology:

• Mixing: Weigh and mix precursor oxides in equimolar proportions.
• Pelletization: Mechanically pelletize the powder mixture to ensure intimate contact between reactants.
• Heat Treatment: Place pellets in a tube furnace and synthesize at high temperatures (e.g., > 800 °C) under a continuous flow of Argon gas to maintain a low oxygen partial pressure (pO₂), accessing regions 2 or 3 of the valence phase diagram [1].
• Quenching: After a sufficient dwell time, rapidly quench the samples to room temperature to preserve the high-entropy phase [1].

4. Validation:

• Phase Purity: Use X-ray Diffraction (XRD) to confirm the formation of a single-phase rock salt structure [1] [5].
• Cation Distribution: Use Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) to verify a homogeneous cation distribution [1].
• Oxidation State: Use X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS) analysis to confirm the predominant divalent state of Mn and Fe [1] [5].

Diagram 1: Experimental workflow for synthesizing and validating high-entropy oxides under controlled oxygen chemical potential, integrating synthesis and characterization steps [1] [5].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials and Reagents for HEO Enthalpy and Distortion Research

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Key Considerations
Binary Oxide Precursors (e.g., MgO, CoO, NiO, CuO, ZnO, MnO₂, Fe₂O₃)	Starting materials for solid-state synthesis of HEOs [1] [11].	High purity (>99.9%) is critical to avoid impurity-driven phase segregation.
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)	Serves as a complexing agent in coprecipitation and room-temperature synthesis methods of HEOs [11].	Aids in achieving homogeneous cation mixing at the molecular level prior to heat treatment.
Argon Gas (High Purity)	Creates an inert, low oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) atmosphere during synthesis [1].	Essential for reducing multivalent cations (e.g., Mn⁴⁺, Fe³⁺) to their divalent states (Mn²⁺, Fe²⁺) for rock salt formation.
Interatomic Potential Sets (e.g., Born Model)	Parameters for classical atomistic simulations to calculate energies and structures [10].	Must be carefully validated for the specific cation cohort being studied to ensure reliable enthalpy and distortion predictions.
Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (e.g., CHGNet)	Enables high-throughput calculation of mixing enthalpies (ΔHmix) and bond length distributions (σbonds) with near-DFT accuracy [1].	Dramatically reduces computational cost compared to direct DFT, allowing for screening of vast compositional spaces.

Visualization of Thermodynamic and Structural Relationships

Diagram 2: Logical relationship between multi-principal cations, their enthalpic and entropic contributions, and the resulting phase stability in HEOs [10] [9] [12].

Valence Stability and the Concept of Oxygen Chemical Potential Overlap

In the thermodynamics-inspired synthesis of high-entropy oxides (HEOs), transcending traditional temperature-centric approaches is paramount. Contemporary research has revealed a multidimensional thermodynamic landscape where oxygen chemical potential (μO₂) is a decisive variable for controlling phase stability and cation valence states [5]. The concept of oxygen chemical potential overlap emerges as a critical, complementary descriptor for predicting the synthesizability of single-phase HEOs, particularly for compositions incorporating inherently multivalent cations. This framework provides a robust, chemically agnostic methodology for navigating the complex thermodynamics of HEOs, enabling access to a broader range of compositions with tailored functional properties [5]. This document details the application of this concept, with specific protocols for its implementation in research targeting valence-stabilized HEOs.

Core Concepts and Quantitative Data

The Role of Oxygen Chemical Potential in Valence Stabilization

In rock salt HEOs and other systems, controlling the oxygen chemical potential during synthesis allows researchers to coerce multivalent cations (such as Mn and Fe) into a preferred, uniform divalent state, despite their inherent tendencies to adopt multiple valences [5]. This control is achieved by constructing a Preferred Valence Phase Diagram based on thermodynamic stability and equilibrium analysis. This diagram, alongside a high-throughput enthalpic stability map derived from atomistic calculations, guides the selection of synthesizable compositions.

Oxygen Chemical Potential Overlap as a Stability Descriptor

Oxygen chemical potential overlap refers to the common range of μO₂ values across which all constituent cations in a target HEO composition can coexist in a single-phase crystal structure with their preferred valence states. A significant overlap in this parameter indicates a higher probability of forming a stable, single-phase HEO [5]. This descriptor is complementary to established parameters like entropy and enthalpy, providing a more complete picture of HEO stability.

Table 1: Key Thermodynamic and Structural Descriptors for HEO Design

Descriptor	Description	Role in HEO Synthesis	Experimental Validation
Oxygen Chemical Potential (μO₂)	The thermodynamic potential of oxygen in the system.	Dictates the stable oxidation states of multivalent cations during synthesis [5].	Controlled via synthesis atmosphere (e.g., air, low pO₂).
Oxygen Chemical Potential Overlap	The common μO₂ range for single-phase stability of all components.	Predicts synthesizability; a larger overlap suggests higher stability [5].	Mapping phase formation against synthesis atmosphere.
Cation Valence State	The oxidation state of a cation within the lattice.	Determines electronic properties and local bonding environment [5] [13].	X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS) [13].
Crystal Structure	The long-range periodic arrangement of atoms.	Can be fluorite, rock salt, bixbyite, etc., influencing properties [5] [13].	X-ray Diffraction (XRD) [5] [13].

Table 2: Valence States of Cations in High-Entropy Oxide Systems

Cation	Common Valences	Valence in HEO Context	Impact on Material Properties
Manganese (Mn)	+2, +3, +4, +7	Predominantly divalent (+2) in rock salt HEOs under controlled μO₂ [5].	Influences electronic conductivity and magnetic properties.
Iron (Fe)	+2, +3	Predominantly divalent (+2) in rock salt HEOs under controlled μO₂ [5].	Affects optical absorption and catalytic activity.
Cerium (Ce)	+3, +4	Mixed valence, with a minor Ce³⁺ fraction in fluorite/bixbyite RE-HEOs [13].	Key for redox catalysis and ionic conductivity.
Praseodymium (Pr)	+3, +4	Consistent mixed-valence state in fluorite/bixbyite RE-HEOs [13].	Enables tunable electronic transport and memristive behavior.
Lanthanum (La)	+3	Trivalent (+3) [13].	Acts as a stable trivalent matrix component.
Samarium (Sm)	+2, +3	Trivalent (+3) [13].	Promotes oxygen vacancy formation in fluorite structures.

The diagram below illustrates the logical workflow for applying the concept of oxygen chemical potential overlap to predict and achieve valence stability in HEOs.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Solid-State Synthesis of HEOs with Valence Control

This protocol is adapted from methods used to synthesize rock salt and rare-earth HEOs, where control of oxygen chemical potential is critical for achieving phase purity and desired cation valence states [5] [13].

3.1.1 Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials for HEO Solid-State Synthesis

Item Name	Function/Description	Critical Parameters
High-Purity Precursor Oxides	(e.g., La₂O₃, CeO₂, MnO, Fe₂O₃, etc.)	Source of cationic components. Purity ≥ 99.99% to avoid impurities [13].
Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia (YSZ) Milling Media	Used in vibratory or ball milling for particle size reduction and homogenization.	Inert, prevents contamination during milling [13].
Methanol (Anhydrous)	Milling medium for wet milling.	Prevents hydration of oxides and promotes efficient mixing [13].
Controlled Atmosphere Furnace	For reactive sintering of pelletized powders.	Must provide precise control over temperature and oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) [5] [13].

3.1.2 Step-by-Step Procedure

• Powder Weighing and Mixing: Weigh stoichiometric amounts of precursor oxides to achieve the desired equimolar or non-equimolar cation composition. The total mass typically ranges from 5–10 g for laboratory-scale synthesis.
• Wet Milling: Transfer the powder mixture into a milling jar. Add YSZ milling media and anhydrous methanol as the milling liquid. Seal the jar and mill for 12–24 hours using a vibratory mill or planetary ball mill to ensure thorough mixing and particle size reduction.
• Drying and Pelletization: Separate the milling media from the slurry. Dry the resulting powder in an oven at 80–100 °C. Once dry, grind the powder lightly in an agate mortar to break up soft agglomerates. Compress the powder into pellets (e.g., 1.27 cm diameter) using a uniaxial press at a pressure of 50–100 MPa.
• Reactive Sintering: Place the pellets in an alumina crucible and sinter in a box furnace or tube furnace. A representative sintering profile is:
  • Ramp: 5 °C/min to 1400 °C.
  • Dwell: Hold at 1400 °C for 48 hours in air or a controlled pO₂ atmosphere to establish the target oxygen chemical potential [13].
  • Cooling: Air-quench the samples to room temperature to preserve the high-temperature phase.
• Post-Synthesis Processing: Gently grind the sintered pellets in an agate mortar and pestle for 10–15 minutes to produce a fine powder for subsequent characterization [13].

Protocol 2: Characterizing Valence States via X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS) is an element-specific probe critical for determining the local electronic structure and oxidation states of cations in HEOs, complementing XRD [13].

3.2.1 Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Essential Materials for X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

Item Name	Function/Description	Critical Parameters
HEO Powder Sample	The material under investigation.	Homogeneous, fine powder from Protocol 1.
Standard Compounds	Reference materials with known oxidation states and coordination.	e.g., CeO₂ (Ce⁴⁺), Ce₂O₃ (Ce³⁺), Pr₆O₁₁ (mixed valence) for calibration [13].
XAFS-Compatible Sample Holder	Holds the powder for measurement in the X-ray beam.	Often a Tef or aluminum holder with Kapton tape windows.
Synchrotron Beamtime	Access to a synchrotron light source.	Required for high-flux, tunable X-rays for L-edge or K-edge measurements.

3.2.2 Step-by-Step Procedure

• Sample Preparation: Uniformly spread a thin layer of the ground HEO powder onto XAFS-compatible tape. Alternatively, mix the powder with a low-X-ray-absorbing boron nitride matrix and pack it into a holder. The goal is to achieve an optically thick, but not overly absorbing, sample.
• Data Collection at Synchrotron: Perform measurements at a synchrotron beamline capable of soft X-ray spectroscopy for L-edges (e.g., of lanthanides) or hard X-ray spectroscopy for K-edges. Collect data for the L₃-edges (or other relevant edges) of all cations of interest (e.g., La, Ce, Pr, Sm) [13].
• Energy Calibration: Simultaneously measure the absorption spectrum of a standard reference foil (e.g., Cu foil for energy calibration) to align the energy scale of different measurement runs.
• Data Analysis (XANES):
  • Process the data (pre-edge background subtraction, post-edge normalization).
  • Compare the normalized X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure (XANES) spectra of the HEO sample with those of the standard compounds.
  • Identify the oxidation state by matching the position and shape of the absorption edge (e.g., the position of the Ce L₃-edge white line is sensitive to the Ce³⁺/Ce⁴⁺ ratio) [13].
  • Use linear combination fitting (LCF) with standard spectra to quantify the fraction of different valence states present.

The following workflow integrates the synthesis and characterization protocols into a complete experimental cycle for developing valence-stable HEOs.

Application in Broader Research Context

The methodologies described herein form the experimental backbone of a thermodynamics-inspired thesis on HEOs. The ability to predict synthesizability via oxygen chemical potential overlap and experimentally validate outcomes through controlled synthesis and advanced characterization creates a closed-loop research framework. This approach is chemically and structurally agnostic, making it applicable beyond rock salt systems to fluorite, bixbyite, and other HEO structure types [5] [13]. For instance, in rare-earth HEOs, varying the concentration of redox-active Ce drives a phase transition from bixbyite to fluorite, a phenomenon governed by both compositional effects and the local electronic structure which is tunable via synthesis parameters [13]. Integrating these protocols with atomistic calculations leveraging machine learning interatomic potentials, as highlighted in recent literature, provides a powerful, multi-scale tool for navigating the vast compositional space of HEOs and unlocking their potential for advanced applications in energy conversion, catalysis, and electronics [5] [14].

Applying Hume-Rothery-Inspired Rules to Ceramic Solid Solutions

The discovery and synthesis of novel high-entropy oxides (HEOs) are often hampered by the vastness of the possible compositional space. The Hume-Rothery rules, long established for predicting metallic solid solution formation, provide a foundational framework that can be adapted to guide this exploration for ceramic systems [15]. Originally formulated for metals, these rules govern the formation of solid-solutions based on criteria such as atomic size, crystal structure, electronegativity, and valence. For ceramics, and specifically for HEOs, these principles require modification to account for the ionic nature of bonding and the critical role of cation oxidation states [9]. Within a broader thesis on thermodynamics-inspired synthesis, these adapted rules serve as rapid screening tools to identify promising multi-component compositions capable of forming single-phase solid solutions, thereby accelerating the design of HEOs with tailored properties.

Theoretical Framework: Modified Hume-Rothery Rules for HEOs

The extension of Hume-Rothery rules to ceramic systems, particularly high-entropy rocksalt oxides (HERSOs), involves focusing on two primary criteria that ensure crystallographic compatibility and thermodynamic feasibility.

Core Rule Modifications

• Oxidation State Compatibility: For a stable rocksalt HEO, all constituent cations should preferentially adopt a +2 oxidation state under the chosen synthesis conditions [15] [1]. The rock salt structure (space group Fm3̄m) is stabilized when all cations are divalent, as in the prototypical (MgCoNiCuZn)O HEO. The incorporation of cations with a persistent preference for other oxidation states (e.g., Sc³⁺) is challenging under standard synthesis conditions [1].
• Ionic Radius Mismatch (Lattice Strain): The variation in the ionic radii of the constituent cations must be limited. This is quantified by the coefficient of variation (CV) of the lattice constants associated with the unmixed constituent oxides in their hypothetical or actual rock salt phases [15]. A low CV indicates minimal lattice distortion, promoting solid solution formation. The traditional Hume-Rothery limit of a 15% difference in atomic radii for metals finds its analog here, where the largest size disparity in the prototypical HEO (8% between Ni²⁺ and Co²⁺) falls well within this limit [1].

Supplementary Thermodynamic and Electronic Considerations

While the above two rules are primary for rapid screening, a comprehensive thermodynamic analysis also considers:

• Electronegativity Compatibility: Cations should have similar electronegativities to minimize the driving force for ordering and the formation of intermetallic compounds, which is an extension of the metallic rule [1].
• Enthalpic Stability: The mixing enthalpy (ΔHmix) should be as low as possible to reduce the enthalpic barrier to single-phase formation [1].
• Bond Length Distribution: The standard deviation of relaxed first-neighbor cation-anion bond lengths (σbonds) quantifies lattice distortion; a lower value is favorable for stability [1].

Quantitative Application: Stability and Synthesizability Descriptors

The practical application of these rules involves calculating specific parameters to populate stability maps and phase diagrams, which guide synthesis.

Table 1: Key Quantitative Descriptors for Hume-Rothery-Informed HEO Design

Parameter	Description	Target Value/Range for Rock Salt HEOs	Computational/Experimental Method
Cation Oxidation State	Stable valence under synthesis conditions	+2 for all cations in rock salt	CALPHAD, X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS)
Coefficient of Variation (CV) of Lattice Constants	Measure of ionic size mismatch from constituent binaries	Low value (specific threshold material-dependent)	X-ray Diffraction (XRD) of binary oxides, literature data
Mixing Enthalpy (ΔHmix)	Enthalpic barrier to single-phase formation	Low or negative (e.g., favorable) [1]	Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (e.g., CHGNet), Density Functional Theory (DFT)
Bond Length Distribution (σbonds)	Standard deviation of relaxed cation-anion bond lengths; quantifies local lattice strain	Minimized [1]	Atomistic calculations leveraging machine learning potentials
Oxygen Chemical Potential Overlap	pO₂-T region where all cations maintain compatible oxidation states	Overlapping stability windows for all cations	CALPHAD-based temperature–oxygen partial pressure phase diagram

Table 2: Exemplary HEO Compositions and Their Hume-Rothery Compliance

HEO Composition	Oxidation State Compatibility	Notable Cationic Features	Synthesizability & Key Requirement
(MgCoNiCuZn)O [1]	All cations stable as 2+ under ambient pO₂, high T	CuO (tenorite) and ZnO (wurtzite) transform to rock salt	Forms under ambient pO₂ > ~875°C (Region 1)
Mn & Fe-containing HEOs (e.g., MgCoNiMnFeO) [1]	Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺ require low pO₂	Multivalent Mn and Fe coerced into 2+ state	Requires controlled, low pO₂ (e.g., Ar flow) to access Regions 2 & 3
Fluorite (Zr₀.₂Ti₀.₂Ce₀.₂Mn₀.₂M₀.₂)O₂-δ (M=Mg/Ca) [16]	Multivalent cations (Ce³⁺/⁴⁺, Mn²⁺/³⁺/⁴⁺)	Incorporates low-valence (Mg²⁺/Ca²⁺) and high-valence (Zr⁴⁺/Ti⁴⁺) cations	Requires solution combustion to accommodate large ionic radius spread and valence differences

Experimental Protocols for Validation and Synthesis

The following protocols detail the key steps for synthesizing and characterizing HEOs based on Hume-Rothery-inspired design.

Protocol 1: Solid-State Synthesis of Rock Salt HEOs under Controlled Oxygen Potential

This protocol is essential for stabilizing cations like Mn and Fe in their 2+ oxidation state [1].

• Objective: To synthesize a single-phase rock salt HEO (e.g., MgCoNiMnFeO) by controlling the oxygen chemical potential to enforce divalent states for all cations.
• Materials:
  • Precursor Oxides: High-purity (≥99.9%) MgO, CoO, NiO, MnO₂, Fe₂O₃.
  • Equipment: High-temperature tube furnace with controlled atmosphere capabilities, alumina crucibles, ball mill, argon gas supply.
• Procedure:
  • Weighing and Mixing: Weigh precursor oxides in an equimolar cation ratio. Use a ball mill for 24 hours with ethanol as a milling medium to ensure homogeneous mixing.
  • Pelletization: Uniaxially press the mixed powders into pellets at a pressure of 100-200 MPa.
  • Calcination/Sintering:
    • Place pellets in an alumina boat and insert them into a tube furnace.
    • Purge the furnace tube with argon gas for at least 30 minutes to remove oxygen.
    • Heat under a continuous argon flow (maintaining low pO₂ ~10⁻¹⁵ to 10⁻²² bar) to a temperature of 900-1100°C with a heating rate of 5°C/min.
    • Hold at the peak temperature for 10-12 hours.
    • Cool the samples to room temperature inside the furnace under continued argon flow.
• Characterization:
  • X-ray Diffraction (XRD): Confirm single-phase rock salt structure (Fm3̄m) with no secondary phases.
  • X-ray Fluorescence (XRF): Verify equimolar cation composition.
  • Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS): Map elemental distribution to confirm homogeneous cation distribution.
  • X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS): Analyze local coordination and oxidation states of Mn and Fe to confirm their predominantly divalent state.

Protocol 2: Solution Combustion Synthesis of Multivalent Fluorite HEOs

This protocol is designed for complex compositions where traditional solid-state reactions are inadequate [16].

• Objective: To synthesize single-phase high-entropy fluorite oxides (e.g., (Zr₀.₂Ti₀.₂Ce₀.₂Mn₀.₂Mg₀.₂)O₂-δ) with multivalent cations and abundant oxygen vacancies.
• Materials:
  • Metal Precursors: Zr(NO₃)₄·6H₂O (99.99%), Titanium isopropoxide (C₁₂H₄₈O₄Ti, 99%), Ce(NO₃)₃·6H₂O, Mn(NO₃)₂·4H₂O, Mg(NO₃)₂·6H₂O.
  • Fuel: Glycine (C₂H₅NO₂) or urea.
  • Equipment: Heating mantle, borosilicate beaker, muffle furnace.
• Procedure:
  • Solution Preparation: Dissolve all metal nitrates and the fuel (glycine) in deionized water in a stoichiometric ratio. The fuel-to-oxidizer ratio is a critical parameter that must be optimized (e.g., φ = 1).
  • Combustion: Place the beaker on a heating mantle at ~300°C. The solution will dehydrate, foam, and auto-ignite, producing a voluminous solid foam.
  • Post-Combustion Heat Treatment: Gently grind the as-synthesized powder and calcine it in a muffle furnace at 600-800°C for 2-4 hours to remove residual carbon and crystallize the fluorite phase.
• Characterization:
  • XRD: Confirm single-phase fluorite structure.
  • Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): Observe porous sponge-like nano-structure morphology.
  • X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS): Determine the oxidation states of Ce and Mn, and confirm the presence of oxygen vacancies.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for HEO Synthesis

Reagent/Material	Function in HEO Synthesis	Exemplary Application
High-Purity Binary Oxide Powders (≥99.9%)	Primary precursors for solid-state reactions, providing metal cations	MgO, CoO, NiO for the rock salt structure [1]
Metal Nitrates and Organic Fuels (e.g., Glycine)	Oxidizer and fuel for solution combustion synthesis; enables molecular-level mixing	Synthesis of (Zr₀.₂Ti₀.₂Ce₀.₂Mn₀.₂Mg₀.₂)O₂-δ [16]
Argon (Ar) Gas Supply	Inert atmosphere gas for controlling oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) during synthesis	Enforcing Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺ states in rock salt HEOs [1]
CALPHAD Software	Computational tool for constructing temperature-pO₂ phase diagrams to identify oxidation state stability windows	Predicting synthesis regions for new HEO compositions [1]
Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (e.g., CHGNet)	High-throughput calculation of enthalpic stability (ΔHmix) and bond length distribution (σbonds)	Generating stability maps for rapid screening of candidate compositions [1]

Workflow and Logical Relationship Diagrams

This workflow illustrates the sequential application of Hume-Rothery-inspired rules and thermodynamic screening to identify synthesizable HEO compositions, followed by the selection of an appropriate synthesis pathway and final validation.

This diagram conceptualizes how progressively lowering the oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) during synthesis coerces multivalent cations into the desired +2 oxidation state, which is a critical requirement for forming many rock salt HEOs.

Modern Synthesis Techniques for High-Entropy Oxide Fabrication

In the thermodynamics-inspired synthesis of high-entropy oxides (HEOs), precise control over the oxidation states of constituent cations is a fundamental challenge. These materials, characterized by their configurational entropy and chemical disorder, often incorporate multiple transition metals with inherent multivalent tendencies. A reducing atmosphere during synthesis serves as a powerful tool to coerce these multivalent cations into a single, thermodynamically preferred valence state, thereby enabling the formation of stable, single-phase solid solutions that would otherwise be inaccessible under ambient or oxidizing conditions [1]. The core principle hinges on manipulating the oxygen chemical potential (μO₂), a key thermodynamic variable, to define a processing window where the desired valence states for all cationic species are simultaneously stable [1] [5].

This application note details the protocols and mechanistic insights for utilizing reducing environments to achieve valence control, framed within a broader research context on advancing HEO synthesis. The ability to stabilize cations like Mn and Fe in their 2+ states within a rock salt HEO structure, despite their strong propensity for higher oxidation states, exemplifies the success of this approach [1]. The following sections provide a structured guide to the underlying thermodynamics, experimental methodologies, and validation techniques essential for implementing this synthesis strategy.

Thermodynamic Principles and Phase Stability

The synthesis of single-phase HEOs is not guaranteed by configurational entropy alone; enthalpic contributions and thermodynamic processing conditions are equally critical [1]. The stability of a solid solution can be understood through the minimization of its chemical potential (Δμ = ΔH~mix~ - TΔS~mix~), where T is the temperature and ΔS~mix~ is dominated by configurational entropy. While high temperatures increase the entropic contribution, the enthalpy of mixing (ΔH~mix~) presents a significant barrier that must be overcome.

• Oxygen Chemical Potential and Valence Stability: The oxygen chemical potential, directly related to the oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) in the processing atmosphere, dictates the stable oxidation state of each cation. By constructing a temperature–pO₂ phase diagram, one can identify specific regions where the valence stability windows of all target cations overlap. For instance, to incorporate Mn and Fe into a rock salt HEO as divalent cations, synthesis must occur within a pO₂ range where Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺ are the stable species, a condition that typically requires a reducing environment far removed from ambient air [1].
• Valence Restrictive Metal-Support Interaction (VR-MSI): A phenomenon closely related to valence control is the Valence Restrictive Metal-Support Interaction, observed in systems like Rh/CeO₂. Small metal clusters can be oxidized by the support and maintained in a specific, stable oxidation state (e.g., Rh²⁺) due to local structural and electronic constraints at the interface. This effect highlights how the local chemical environment can enforce valence stability [17].

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for establishing the thermodynamic parameters required for successful valence-controlled synthesis.

Diagram 1: Logical workflow for defining synthesis parameters based on thermodynamic analysis. The process involves identifying the target cations, calculating stability metrics, and using phase diagrams to find the pO₂ and temperature region where all desired valence states are stable.

Key Thermodynamic Regions for Cation Stabilization

Table 1: Key regions in a temperature-pO₂ phase diagram for stabilizing divalent cations in rock salt HEOs, adapted from the thermodynamic analysis of 3d transition metals [1].

Region	pO₂ Range	Temperature	Stable Divalent Cations	Key Consideration
Region 1	Ambient (~0.21 bar)	> ~875 °C	Mg, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn	Standard condition for prototypical MgCoNiCuZnO HEO. CuO can reduce at lower pO₂.
Region 2	Low (e.g., <10⁻⁵ bar)	High (e.g., >800 °C)	Mg, Co, Ni, Zn, Mn²⁺	Enables Mn incorporation; Cu is excluded due to reduction to metallic state.
Region 3	Very Low (e.g., ~10⁻¹⁵ bar)	High (e.g., >800 °C)	Mg, Co, Ni, Zn, Mn²⁺, Fe²⁺	Enables simultaneous incorporation of both Mn and Fe in divalent states.

Experimental Protocol: Synthesis of Rock Salt HEOs under Reducing Atmosphere

This protocol provides a detailed methodology for the solid-state synthesis of a five-component (Mg, Co, Ni, Mn, Fe)O rock salt HEO under a controlled argon atmosphere, based on established thermodynamic principles [1].

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential materials and equipment for the synthesis.

Item	Specification	Function/Justification
Precursors	MgO, CoO, NiO, MnO, Fe₂O₃ (High Purity, >99.9%)	Source of metal cations. Using oxides avoids decomposition steps. Fe₂O₃ is reduced in situ to FeO.
Milling Media	Zirconia or Alumina balls	For mechanical homogenization of the precursor powder mixture.
Tube Furnace	Capable of sustained 1000-1100°C, with gas inlet/outlet	Provides high-temperature environment for solid-state reaction.
Quartz Tube/Alumina Boat	High-temperature compatible	Sample holder within the furnace tube.
Gas System	Argon (Ar) gas cylinder, Mass Flow Controller (MFC)	Creates and maintains an inert, oxygen-poor (reducing) atmosphere.
Oxygen Sensor	(Optional) In-line or at furnace exhaust	Monitors the actual pO₂ within the reaction zone.

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Precursor Weighing and Mixing:

  • Weigh out equimolar quantities (e.g., 0.2 moles each) of MgO, CoO, NiO, MnO, and Fe₂O³ powders.
  • Transfer the powder mixture to a ball-milling jar with an appropriate number of milling balls.
  • Add a suitable milling solvent (e.g., isopropanol) to facilitate mixing and prevent overheating.
  • Mill the mixture for 12-24 hours at a moderate speed to ensure thorough mechanical homogenization.

• Powder Processing:

  • After milling, dry the resulting slurry in an oven at ~80°C overnight to evaporate the solvent.
  • Gently grind the dried powder cake using an agate mortar and pestle to obtain a fine, free-flowing powder.

• Calcination under Reducing Atmosphere:

  • Transfer the homogenized powder to a high-temperature-compatible boat (e.g., alumina).
  • Place the boat inside the quartz tube of the tube furnace.
  • Seal the furnace tube and initiate a continuous flow of high-purity argon gas. A typical flow rate is 40-80 mL/min [1]. Purge the tube for at least 45-60 minutes to ensure complete displacement of ambient air.
  • Heat the furnace to the target synthesis temperature (e.g., 1000°C) at a controlled heating rate of 3-5°C per minute.
  • Maintain the peak temperature for 4-6 hours under continuous argon flow to allow for complete reaction and single-phase formation.

• Product Recovery:

  • After the dwell time, turn off the furnace and allow it to cool naturally to room temperature under continuous argon flow. This step is critical to prevent re-oxidation of the product during cooling.
  • Once cool, retrieve the sintered product and gently grind it again for subsequent characterization.

The entire experimental workflow, from precursor preparation to final product, is summarized below.

Diagram 2: The step-by-step experimental workflow for synthesizing HEOs under a controlled reducing atmosphere, highlighting the critical steps of atmosphere control and thermal treatment.

Characterization and Validation Protocols

Confirming the success of valence-controlled synthesis requires a multi-faceted characterization approach to verify phase purity, chemical homogeneity, and most importantly, the oxidation states of the constituent cations.

• Phase Purity and Crystallinity:

  • Technique: X-ray Diffraction (XRD).
  • Protocol: Acquire a diffraction pattern over a 2θ range of 10° to 80°. For a successful synthesis of a rock salt HEO, the pattern should show characteristic peaks corresponding to the rock salt structure (e.g., a primary peak near 37°). The absence of extra peaks from secondary phases indicates the formation of a single-phase solid solution [1].

• Chemical Homogeneity:

  • Technique: Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS).
  • Protocol: Perform EDS mapping on multiple regions of the sample using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). A homogeneous distribution of all metal cations (Mg, Co, Ni, Mn, Fe) at the microscale confirms a well-mixed solid solution, as required for an HEO [1].

• Oxidation State Analysis:

  • Technique: X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS), specifically X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure (XANES).
  • Protocol: Collect Mn K-edge and Fe K-edge XANES spectra. Compare the position and shape of the absorption edges to those of standard reference compounds (e.g., MnO, Mn₂O₃, FeO, Fe₂O₃). A successful synthesis will show spectra for Mn and Fe that align closely with the MnO and FeO standards, confirming the dominant 2+ oxidation state [1] [5].

Table 3: Quantitative data from a representative successful synthesis of (Mg,Co,Ni,Mn,Fe)O HEO under reducing atmosphere [1].

Characterization Method	Key Result	Interpretation
XRD	Single-phase rock salt structure; no secondary phases detected.	Confirms formation of a phase-pure solid solution.
EDS Elemental Mapping	Homogeneous spatial distribution of all five cations.	Verifies chemical homogeneity at the micro-scale.
XANES (Mn K-edge)	Edge position and pre-edge features consistent with MnO standard.	Confirms Mn is predominantly in the 2+ oxidation state.
XANES (Fe K-edge)	Edge position and pre-edge features consistent with FeO standard.	Confirms Fe is predominantly in the 2+ oxidation state.
BET Surface Area	66.45 m²/g (for analogous CO₂-assisted g-C₃N₄ synthesis [18])	Indicates developed surface area, often a consequence of gas-evolving synthesis.

Troubleshooting and Technical Notes

• Incomplete Reaction/Secondary Phases: If XRD reveals unreacted precursors or secondary phases, consider increasing the synthesis temperature, extending the dwell time, or improving the precursor homogenization through longer milling.
• Cation Re-oxidation: If XANES analysis indicates higher oxidation states than desired, ensure the integrity of the gas sealing system and confirm that the argon flow is maintained throughout the entire cooling process. Using an oxygen getter (e.g., titanium sponge) upstream in the gas flow can further scrub trace oxygen.
• Dynamic Atmosphere Control: For exceptionally complex systems with multiple multivalent cations, a static reducing atmosphere may not be sufficient. A Dynamic Controlled Atmosphere (DCA) approach, where the oxygen partial pressure is actively modulated during different stages of the synthesis, can be employed to navigate complex reaction pathways and intermediate phases, as demonstrated in the synthesis of O3-type sodium cathode materials [19].

Comparative Analysis of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Synthesis Routes

The synthesis of high-entropy oxides (HEOs) has emerged as a pivotal area in materials science, leveraging configurational entropy to stabilize single-phase solid solutions from multiple cations. These materials, typically comprising five or more principal elements in near-equimolar ratios, demonstrate exceptional properties for applications in catalysis, energy storage, and beyond [20]. The conceptual framework for this analysis is situated within thermodynamics-inspired synthesis, where entropy-driven stabilization is harnessed to navigate the complex compositional space of HEOs [1]. The synthesis pathways for these multifaceted materials can be broadly categorized into top-down and bottom-up approaches, each with distinct thermodynamic considerations, procedural requirements, and resultant material characteristics. This analysis provides a comparative examination of these routes, focusing on their implementation, experimental parameters, and implications for material structure and functionality, thereby offering a structured guide for researchers in the rational design of HEOs.

The following table summarizes the fundamental characteristics, advantages, and limitations of top-down and bottom-up synthesis routes for high-entropy materials.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Synthesis Routes for High-Entropy Materials

Feature	Top-Down Approach	Bottom-Up Approach
Core Principle	Begins with bulk high-entropy precursors followed by exfoliation or etching into nanostructures [21]	Starts with atomic/molecular ingredients which are assembled into nanostructured HEOs [21]
Common Synthesis Methods	Mechanical exfoliation, argon/oxygen plasma exfoliation, selective chemical etching [21]	Polyol process, solvothermal/hydrothermal methods, electrochemical synthesis, calcination of precursors [21] [22] [23]
Typical Morphology	Ultrathin nanosheets, exfoliated layers [21]	2D layered structures, nanoparticles, flaky structures composed of nanoparticles [21] [23]
Key Advantages	Can utilize pre-formed, stable bulk HEOs; effective for creating 2D layers from van der Waals materials [21]	High compositional homogeneity from atomic-level mixing; direct formation of nanostructures; wider variety of nanostructured morphologies [21] [24]
Inherent Limitations	Potential deviation from original stoichiometry during exfoliation/etching; possible introduction of defects [21]	Difficulty in mixing multiple elements simultaneously while maintaining 2D morphology; often requires precise control over reaction kinetics [21]
Entropy Role	Relies on entropy stabilization of the bulk precursor before exfoliation	High configurational entropy is leveraged during the synthesis to form the stabilized single-phase [24]

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Top-Down Synthesis via Plasma Exfoliation

This protocol details the synthesis of spinel-type high-entropy oxide (HEO) nanosheets through the oxygen plasma exfoliation of high-entropy layered double hydroxides (HE-LDH), as derived from published methodologies [21].

1. Synthesis of Bulk HE-LDH Precursor: - Reagent Preparation: Dissolve metal salts (e.g., Fe, Al, Cr, Co, Ni, Zn, Cu nitrates or chlorides) in deionized water to form a homogeneous cationic solution with a total metal ion concentration of 0.1-0.3 M. - Hydrothermal Reaction: Transfer the solution to a Teflon-lined autoclave. React at a temperature range of 120-150 °C for 6-12 hours to crystallize the CO₃²⁻-intercalated HE-LDH. - Product Isolation: After cooling, collect the precipitate by centrifugation, then wash thoroughly with deionized water and ethanol to remove residual ions. Dry the product in an oven at 60-80 °C.

2. Plasma Exfoliation to HEO Nanosheets: - Precursor Loading: Place the synthesized bulk HE-LDH powder in a plasma reactor chamber. - Exfoliation Parameters: Set the reactor to use oxygen plasma. Maintain a system pressure of 50-100 Pa and apply a plasma power of 50-150 W. The exfoliation duration typically ranges from 10 to 30 minutes. - Output: The process yields ultrathin spinel-type (e.g., (FeCrCoNiCu)₃O₄) HEO nanosheets with diameters up to 100 nm [21].

Bottom-Up Synthesis via the Polyol Method

This protocol describes a soft chemistry, bottom-up route for synthesizing 2D layered high-entropy transition metal hydroxides (HEHs) using a solvothermal polyol process [21].

1. Reagent Solution Preparation: - Metal Solutions: Dissolve individual metal salts (e.g., Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, CrCl₃·6H₂O, FeCl₃·6H₂O, Mn(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, Ni(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, ZnCl₂) in ethylene glycol (EG) to create 0.2 M stock solutions. - Precipitant Solution: Dissolve potassium acetate (KOAC) in ethylene glycol to form a 1.2 M solution. Alternatively, a 1.0 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution in EG can be used as a co-precipitant.

2. Solvothermal Reaction: - Mixing: Combine the metal salt solutions in equimolar ratios (e.g., 2 mL each of five salts, 10 mL total) with 10 mL of the KOAC/EG solution in an autoclave. - Reaction Execution: Seal the autoclave and heat it at 200 °C for 2 hours. After the reaction, allow the system to cool to room temperature naturally. - Product Work-up: Collect the resulting product by centrifugation. Wash sequentially with deionized water and ethanol three times each to purify the 2D layered HEHs.

3. Conversion to HEO Nanoparticles (Optional): - Annealing: Calcine the as-synthesized HEHs at 200 °C in air. This thermal treatment converts the layered hydroxide structure into superparamagnetic spinel-type high-entropy oxide nanoparticles [21].

Bottom-Up Electrochemical Synthesis

This protocol outlines a facile, substrate-free electrochemical method for synthesizing high-entropy hydroxide and oxide nanoparticles under ambient conditions [22].

1. Electrolyte Preparation: - Prepare an aqueous solution containing metal nitrate salts (e.g., Fe, Mn, Ni, Ca, Mg) with a total metal ion concentration of 10-50 mM.

2. Electrochemical Setup and Reaction: - Cell Configuration: Utilize a standard two-electrode system. Platinum plates can serve as both anode and cathode. - Reaction Execution: Apply a constant current density, typically ranging from 50 to 150 mA/cm², for a duration of 10-30 minutes. The high current density induces a turbulent environment at the electrode interface due to vigorous hydrogen evolution, which facilitates the formation and mixing of metal hydroxide nanoparticles. - Product Collection: Nanoparticles of high-entropy hydroxide form directly within the electrolyte. Collect these nanoparticles via centrifugation.

3. Conversion to Oxide (Optional): - Calcination: Subject the collected hydroxide nanoparticles to a calcination process at temperatures between 300-500 °C in air. This step transforms the material into the corresponding high-entropy oxide with atomic-scale mixing of all elements [22].

Synthesis Workflow Diagrams

Synthesis Pathways for HEOs

This diagram illustrates the sequential steps and key decision points in both top-down and bottom-up synthesis routes for high-entropy materials, highlighting the role of thermodynamic control parameters.

Bottom-Up Synthesis Workflows

This diagram details the specific procedural steps for two prominent bottom-up synthesis methods: the polyol process and electrochemical synthesis, showing the transformation from precursors to final high-entropy materials.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

The synthesis of high-entropy oxides requires careful selection of precursors and reagents to achieve homogeneous multi-element mixing and the desired phase. The following table lists key materials used in the featured protocols.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for High-Entropy Oxide Synthesis

Reagent/Material	Typical Function	Example Role in Synthesis
Transition Metal Salts (Nitrates, Chlorides) [21] [22]	Cationic precursors supplying the metal elements for the HEO lattice.	Equimolar mixtures of Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Zn salts are used to achieve high configurational entropy [21].
Ethylene Glycol (Polyol) [21]	Solvent and complexing agent in solvothermal synthesis.	Facilitates complexation with metal cations, controls hydrolysis, and promotes the growth of 2D layered structures [21].
Alkaline Precipitants (KOH, NaOH, KOAC) [21]	Agents to adjust pH and induce hydroxide precipitation.	Potassium acetate (KOAC) in ethylene glycol is used to hydrolyze metal ions and form layered high-entropy hydroxides [21].
Sacrificial Carbon Templates [23]	Structural template for creating nanostructured morphologies.	A layered carbon template formed from ammonium sulfate and glucose creates a flaky morphology for spinel (FeCoNiCrMn)₃O₄ HEO [23].
Controlled Atmosphere Gases (Argon, Air) [1]	Control oxygen chemical potential (pO₂) during synthesis.	A continuous Argon flow is used during high-temperature synthesis to maintain low pO₂, coercing multivalent cations like Mn and Fe into divalent states [1].

Quantitative Performance Metrics

The performance of synthesized HEOs is critically evaluated, particularly for applications like the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). The following table consolidates key quantitative data from the cited studies.

Table 3: Performance Metrics of High-Entropy Materials in Electrocatalysis

Material	Synthesis Method	Application	Key Performance Metric	Reference
2D Layered HEHs (Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn)	Bottom-up polyol process	OER in 0.1 M KOH	Overpotential: 275 mV @ 10 mA cm⁻²	[21]
Nanosized Spinel HEO (FeCoNiCrMn)₃O₄	Bottom-up with sacrificial carbon template	OER	Overpotential: 239 mV @ 10 mA cm⁻²; Tafel slope: 52.4 mV/dec; Stability: 24 h @ 100 mA/cm²	[23]
HEO Rock Salt Systems (with Mn, Fe)	Thermodynamics-inspired (pO₂ control)	Model System for Cation Valence Control	Successful coercion of Mn and Fe into divalent (2+) states within a single-phase rock salt structure.	[1]

The strategic selection between top-down and bottom-up synthesis routes is paramount in the thermodynamics-inspired design of high-entropy oxides. Top-down methods, such as plasma exfoliation, offer a direct path to two-dimensional morphologies from bulk entropy-stabilized precursors. In contrast, bottom-up approaches, including the polyol process and electrochemical synthesis, provide superior control over nanoscale morphology and compositional homogeneity by leveraging high configurational entropy during the formation process itself. The integration of thermodynamic principles—most notably the precise management of oxygen chemical potential—as a key synthesis parameter is crucial for expanding the compositional space of HEOs, particularly for incorporating multivalent cations like Mn and Fe. The protocols, workflows, and data summarized herein provide a foundational toolkit for researchers aiming to contribute to this rapidly advancing field, guiding the rational synthesis of next-generation high-entropy materials tailored for advanced applications in electrocatalysis and energy storage.

The choice between solid-state and solution-based synthesis methods is a fundamental consideration in materials science and chemistry, with significant implications for the outcome of a reaction. Solid-state synthesis is a method of preparing materials where reactants are in the solid state and undergo chemical reactions at elevated temperatures to form new solid products, widely used in the production of inorganic compounds, ceramics, and semiconductors [25]. In contrast, solution-phase synthesis involves chemical reactions where reactants are dissolved in a solvent medium, enabling molecular-level mixing and often proceeding at lower temperatures. The selection between these pathways profoundly affects critical outcome parameters including product purity, crystallinity, particle morphology, reaction yield, and scalability. Within the emerging field of thermodynamics-inspired synthesis of high-entropy oxides (HEOs)—complex ceramic materials containing five or more cation species in a single-phase crystal structure—understanding the mechanistic distinctions and thermodynamic driving forces of these synthetic approaches becomes particularly crucial for controlling material properties and functionality [5] [9].

The growing interest in HEOs stems from their unique tunable properties, including exceptional thermal stability, electrochemical performance, and catalytic activity, which arise from their high configurational entropy and synergistic effects between multiple constituent elements [9]. As research advances toward targeted design of these complex materials, a comprehensive understanding of how synthesis methodology influences thermodynamic stability, cation distribution, and ultimately functional performance becomes indispensable. This application note provides a systematic comparison of solid-state and solution-based methods, with specific emphasis on their application in HEO synthesis, to guide researchers in selecting appropriate methodologies for specific research objectives.

Fundamental Mechanisms and Thermodynamic Driving Forces

Solid-State Reaction Mechanisms

Solid-state reactions proceed through fundamentally different mechanisms compared to solution-based approaches, primarily driven by high-temperature diffusion processes. In these systems, reactants remain in solid form and undergo chemical transformations at elevated temperatures, typically ranging from 800°C to 1600°C for oxide materials [25] [26]. The reaction initiates at points of contact between reactant particles, where atomic or ionic diffusion across interfaces leads to nucleation of product phases. These nuclei subsequently grow through continued diffusion, eventually consuming the starting materials to form the final product. The diffusion-controlled nature of these processes represents the rate-limiting step, with reaction kinetics following exponential temperature dependence according to the Arrhenius equation.

Several critical factors govern solid-state reaction efficiency and outcome. Reactant surface area significantly influences reaction rates, with finer powders providing greater interfacial contact areas and shorter diffusion paths [26]. Chemical reactivity of starting materials, including their structural stability and bonding characteristics, determines the energy barrier for product formation. Additionally, reaction atmosphere controls oxygen chemical potential, which plays a decisive role in oxide systems by influencing cation oxidation states and defect concentrations [5] [26]. In the specific context of high-entropy oxide synthesis, control over oxygen chemical potential enables manipulation of multivalent cations into preferred valence states, a crucial parameter for stabilizing single-phase solid solutions [5] [27].

The thermodynamic driving force for solid-state reactions stems from the decrease in Gibbs free energy (ΔG) as the system transitions from separated reactants to a more stable product phase. For entropy-stabilized systems like HEOs, the configurational entropy term (-TΔS) becomes dominant, overcoming positive enthalpy contributions (ΔH) at elevated temperatures according to the relationship ΔG = ΔH - TΔS [9]. This entropy stabilization mechanism enables the formation of single-phase solid solutions from multiple cation components that would otherwise phase-separate under equilibrium conditions at lower temperatures.

Solution-Based Reaction Mechanisms

Solution-phase synthesis employs liquid solvents as a reaction medium, enabling intimate mixing of reactants at the molecular or ionic level. This approach typically proceeds through homogeneous reaction pathways where dissolved species collide and react in the solvent matrix, resulting in more uniform reaction environments compared to solid-state methods. The solvent itself plays an active role in mediating reactions by solvating ions, stabilizing intermediates, and facilitating mass transport. Solution-based reactions generally occur at significantly lower temperatures (room temperature to 300°C) than solid-state approaches, reducing energy input requirements while offering alternative kinetic pathways with lower activation barriers.

Key advantages of solution methods include enhanced compositional control at the molecular level and the ability to produce materials with high specific surface areas and tailored morphologies [28] [29]. For multicomponent systems, solution synthesis promotes homogeneous cation distribution, which is particularly advantageous for HEO formation where elemental segregation must be avoided. Additionally, solution routes enable the use of molecular precursors that can transform into desired products at reduced temperatures, bypassing the high-temperature diffusion limitations of solid-state reactions.

The thermodynamic driving forces in solution synthesis include the formation of strong chemical bonds in products with lower free energy than reactants, precipitation from supersaturated solutions, and in specific cases, entropy gains from the release of solvent molecules or counterions. While configurational entropy remains relevant for HEO formation in solution methods, the lower synthesis temperatures often emphasize enthalpy-driven stabilization through strong metal-oxygen bond formation and kinetic trapping of metastable phases.

Table 1: Fundamental Characteristics of Solid-State and Solution-Based Synthesis Methods

Parameter	Solid-State Synthesis	Solution-Based Synthesis
Reaction Medium	Solid particles	Liquid solvent
Typical Temperature Range	800-1600°C	Room temperature to 300°C
Primary Mechanism	Solid-state diffusion	Molecular collision in solution
Mixing Scale	Micrometer to millimeter	Molecular to atomic level
Driving Forces	Gibbs free energy minimization, entropy stabilization	Precipitation, molecular assembly, kinetic trapping
Key Advantages	Simplicity, scalability, high crystallinity	Homogeneous mixing, morphology control, lower temperatures
Common Products	Ceramics, metal oxides, semiconductors	Nanoparticles, coordination compounds, organic molecules

Experimental Protocols

Solid-State Synthesis of High-Entropy Oxides

Protocol 1: Conventional High-Temperature Solid-State Synthesis

This protocol describes the synthesis of single-phase rock salt (Mg₀.₂Ni₀.₂Co₀.₂Cu₀.₂Zn₀.₂)O high-entropy oxide through solid-state reaction from binary oxide precursors [25] [9].

• Materials and Reagents:

  • Precursor oxides: MgO, NiO, CoO, CuO, ZnO (high purity ≥99.9%)
  • Acetone or isopropanol (reagent grade)
  • Aggate mortar and pestle or ball milling equipment
  • High-temperature furnace (capable of 1000°C)
  • Platinum or alumina crucibles
  • Hydraulic press
  • Glove box (optional, for moisture-sensitive materials)

• Procedure:

  • Weighing: Precisely weigh equimolar quantities (e.g., 0.02 moles each) of the precursor oxides to achieve the desired cation stoichiometry.
  • Mixing: Transfer the powder mixture to an agate mortar and grind thoroughly for 30-60 minutes with occasional addition of small amounts of acetone or isopropanol to facilitate mixing and prevent segregation. Alternatively, use ball milling with agate balls for 2-6 hours for improved homogeneity.
  • Pelletization: Transfer the thoroughly mixed powder to a die and compress into pellets at 50-100 MPa using a hydraulic press. Pelletization enhances interparticle contact and reduces diffusion distances.
  • First Heat Treatment: Place pellets in a suitable crucible and heat in a furnace under air atmosphere. Use a heating rate of 3-5°C/min to the target temperature of 1000-1100°C. Maintain at the maximum temperature for 12-24 hours, then cool to room temperature at 2-5°C/min.
  • Intermediate Grinding: Carefully grind the heat-treated pellets back into fine powder using a mortar and pestle to expose fresh surfaces and enhance reaction completeness.
  • Second Heat Treatment: Repeat the pelletization and heating cycle (steps 3-5) using identical conditions to ensure complete reaction and homogenization.
  • Characterization: The final product should be characterized by X-ray diffraction to confirm single-phase formation and homogeneous cation distribution verified by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy [9].

• Critical Parameters:

  • Atmosphere Control: For cations with multiple oxidation states (e.g., Mn, Fe), precise control of oxygen partial pressure may be necessary using specialized atmospheres (N₂, O₂, or Ar/H₂ mixtures) [5] [26].
  • Heating Rate: Controlled heating prevents rapid gas evolution and maintains structural integrity.
  • Cooling Rate: Controlled cooling prevents thermal stress and cracking while maintaining the desired cation distribution.

Protocol 2: Thermodynamics-Inspired HEO Synthesis with Oxygen Potential Control

This advanced protocol emphasizes control of oxygen chemical potential to manipulate cation valence states in rock salt HEOs containing multivalent cations like Mn and Fe [5] [27].

• Materials and Reagents:

  • All materials from Protocol 1
  • Gas mixing system for controlled atmospheres
  • Tube furnace with gas flow capabilities
  • Oxygen sensors

• Procedure:

  • Precursor Preparation: Follow steps 1-3 from Protocol 1 to prepare pelletized reactant mixtures.
  • Atmosphere Optimization: Determine the optimal oxygen chemical potential (μO₂) range for stabilizing target cation valence states using thermodynamic calculations or established phase diagrams.
  • Reactive Heat Treatment: Place pellets in a tube furnace and establish the desired gas atmosphere with controlled oxygen partial pressure. Heat to 1000-1100°C with a soaking time of 12-24 hours under continuous gas flow.
  • Quenching or Controlled Cooling: Rapidly quench samples to preserve high-temperature phase or use controlled cooling under the same atmosphere.
  • Valence State Verification: Characterize cation oxidation states using X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) analysis to confirm successful valence control [5].

• Critical Parameters:

  • Oxygen Chemical Potential: Precise control is essential for coercing multivalent cations into preferred oxidation states.
  • Thermodynamic Calculations: Prior calculation of stability windows for target phases guides atmosphere selection.
  • Quenching Rate: Rapid quenching may be necessary to preserve metastable configurations achieved at high temperatures.

Solution-Phase Synthesis of Sequence-Defined Macromolecules

Protocol 3: Iterative Solution-Phase Synthesis Using Orthogonal Reactions

This protocol illustrates solution-phase synthesis of sequence-defined macromolecules through an iterative two-step cycle combining Passerini three-component reaction (P-3CR) and TAD Diels-Alder chemistry [28].

• Materials and Reagents:

  • AB-type linker molecules (L1: isocyanide-diene; L2: TAD-carboxylic acid)
  • Aldehyde components for sequence variation
  • Anhydrous dichloromethane (DCM)
  • Stearic acid as starting molecule
  • Standard schlenk line equipment for inert atmosphere

• Procedure:

  • Initial Functionalization: Dissolve stearic acid (1.0 equiv) and L2 (1.2 equiv) in anhydrous DCM under inert atmosphere. Stir at room temperature until reaction completion (monitored by TLC or LCMS).
  • Purification: Isolate the intermediate by column chromatography following reaction completion.
  • Passerini Reaction: Dissolve the purified intermediate (1.0 equiv) with L1 (1.2 equiv) and selected aldehyde (1.5 equiv) in DCM. Stir at room temperature until complete conversion.
  • Purification: Isolate the product again by column chromatography.
  • Iterative Elongation: Repeat steps 1-4 in sequence to build the desired macromolecular chain with specific monomer sequencing.
  • Final Characterization: Analyze the final sequence-defined macromolecule by LCMS and 1H-NMR spectroscopy [28].

• Critical Parameters:

  • Orthogonal Reactivity: Ensure complete reaction at each step without affecting previously incorporated functional groups.
  • Purification Efficiency: Column chromatography between steps is essential to maintain monodispersity.
  • Moisture Exclusion: Maintain anhydrous conditions for isocyanide functionality.

Protocol 4: Solid-Phase Synthesis of Sequence-Defined Macromolecules

This protocol describes the solid-phase approach for synthesizing sequence-defined macromolecules using the same chemical reactions as Protocol 3, but with a solid support [28].

• Materials and Reagents:

  • 2-chlorotrityl chloride functionalized resin
  • AB-type linker molecules (L1 and L2, same as solution phase)
  • Anhydrous DMF and DCM
  • Piperidine for Fmoc deprotection
  • Peptide synthesis vessel or syringe reactor with frit
  • Cleavage cocktail (1% TFA in DCM)

• Procedure:

  • Resin Functionalization: Load hexadiene-1-ol onto 2-chlorotrityl chloride resin (0.1-0.5 mmol/g loading) to provide the initial diene functionality.
  • First Diels-Alder Reaction: Swell the functionalized resin in DCM, then add L2 (3.0 equiv). Agitate for 2-12 hours until complete conversion.
  • Washing: Drain the reaction solution and wash the resin thoroughly with DCM (3×), DMF (3×), and DCM (3×).
  • Passerini Reaction: Treat the resin with a solution of L1 (3.0 equiv) and aldehyde (5.0 equiv) in DCM. Agitate until reaction completion.
  • Washing: Repeat washing procedure as in step 3.
  • Iterative Elongation: Repeat steps 2-5 to build the desired sequence.
  • Cleavage: Treat the resin with cleavage cocktail (1% TFA in DCM) for 10-30 minutes to release the final macromolecule from the solid support.
  • Characterization: Analyze the product by LCMS and 1H-NMR spectroscopy [28].

• Critical Parameters:

  • Resin Selection: Acid-sensitive linker enables mild cleavage conditions preserving product integrity.
  • Thorough Washing: Essential to remove excess reagents and prevent sequence defects.
  • Reaction Monitoring: Color changes (TAD reaction visual feedback) and quantitative conversions ensure fidelity.

Table 2: Comparison of Experimental Approaches for Solid-State and Solution-Phase Syntheses

Experimental Aspect	Solid-State HEO Synthesis	Solution-Phase Macromolecule Synthesis	Solid-Phase Macromolecule Synthesis
Primary Equipment	High-temperature furnace, hydraulic press	Schlenk line, chromatography columns	Peptide synthesizer or syringe reactor
Temperature Range	1000-1100°C	Room temperature	Room temperature
Reaction Time	12-24 hours (per cycle)	Minutes to hours (per step)	2-12 hours (per step)
Purification Method	Intermediate grinding	Column chromatography	Filtration and washing
Atmosphere Control	Critical (oxygen potential)	Inert atmosphere (argon/nitrogen)	Inert atmosphere (argon/nitrogen)
Scalability	Gram to kilogram scale	Limited by chromatography	Limited by resin capacity
Key Characterization	XRD, EDX, XAFS	LCMS, NMR	LCMS, NMR

Comparative Analysis and Research Applications

Advantages and Limitations

The strategic selection between solid-state and solution-based synthesis methodologies requires careful consideration of their respective advantages and limitations relative to research objectives.

Solid-State Synthesis Advantages:

• Environmental Impact: Reduced solvent usage minimizes chemical waste generation [25]
• Scalability: Capable of producing materials from gram to industrial kilogram scales [26]
• Structural Perfection: High-temperature processing often yields products with high crystallinity and thermal stability
• Simplicity: Straightforward experimental setup requiring minimal specialized equipment for basic implementations [25]

Solid-State Synthesis Limitations:

• Morphological Control: Limited ability to control particle size, shape, and surface morphology in final products [26]
• Reaction Conditions: High energy input required to overcome diffusion barriers [26]
• Homogeneity Challenges: Potential for incomplete reaction or local compositional variations requiring multiple processing cycles [26]
• Phase Purity: Susceptibility to kinetically trapped intermediate phases or metastable structures

Solution-Based Synthesis Advantages:

• Molecular-Level Mixing: Enhanced homogeneity with atomic-scale control over composition [28]
• Morphological Control: Ability to tailor particle size, shape, and surface characteristics through precursor and solvent selection [29]
• Lower Processing Temperatures: Reduced energy requirements and access to metastable phases not stable at high temperatures
• Versatility: Compatible with a wide range of molecular precursors and reaction pathways

Solution-Based Synthesis Limitations:

• Solvent Requirements: Large solvent volumes create waste disposal challenges and increase cost
• Scalability Constraints: Purification becomes increasingly challenging at larger scales, particularly for sequence-defined systems [28]
• Product Limitations: Often produces powders with lower density than solid-state processed materials
• Impurity Incorporation: Potential for solvent-derived contamination in final products

Applications in High-Entropy Oxide Research

The synthesis methodology selection profoundly impacts HEO research outcomes and applications. Solid-state approaches have demonstrated remarkable success in producing single-phase HEOs with rock salt, perovskite, and spinel structures [9]. These materials exhibit exceptional functional properties including tunable magnetic behavior, reduced thermal conductivity, and enhanced electrochemical performance for battery applications [9]. The thermodynamics-inspired approach to HEO synthesis emphasizes precise control of oxygen chemical potential to manipulate cation valence states, particularly for compositions incorporating multivalent elements like Mn and Fe [5] [27]. This control enables stabilization of predominantly divalent states in rock salt HEOs despite inherent multivalent tendencies, expanding the compositional space accessible for materials design.

Solution-based methods offer complementary advantages for HEO synthesis, particularly for nanostructured materials where surface energy contributions significantly impact stability [9]. The enhanced mixing at molecular levels promotes homogeneous cation distributions without extended high-temperature treatments, potentially accessing metastable configurations not achievable through equilibrium solid-state reactions. Additionally, solution methods enable fabrication of HEO thin films and nanostructured architectures with high specific surface areas advantageous for catalytic and energy storage applications.

Research Toolkit

Essential Equipment and Reagents

Table 3: Essential Research Toolkit for Solid-State and Solution-Based Synthesis

Category	Item	Specification/Function	Primary Applications
Equipment	High-temperature furnace	Capable to 1600°C with controlled atmosphere	Solid-state synthesis
	Tube furnace	With gas flow control for oxygen potential manipulation	Thermodynamics-inspired HEO synthesis
	Ball mill	For efficient reactant mixing	Solid-state precursor preparation
	Hydraulic press	50-100 MPa for pelletization	Solid-state synthesis
	Glove box	Moisture and oxygen free environment	Air-sensitive materials handling
	Peptide synthesizer	Automated solid-phase synthesis	Sequence-defined macromolecules
	Schlenk line	Inert atmosphere reaction setup	Air-sensitive solution synthesis
	Chromatography system	For purification of solution-synthesized products	Solution-phase synthesis
Reagents	High-purity oxide powders	≥99.9% purity for metal oxides	Solid-state HEO precursors
	AB-type linker molecules	Orthogonal reactivity (L1: isocyanide-diene; L2: TAD-acid)	Sequence-defined macromolecules
	2-chlorotrityl chloride resin	Acid-labile solid support	Solid-phase synthesis
	Anhydrous solvents	DMF, DCM, acetonitrile	Solution and solid-phase synthesis
	Controlled atmosphere gases	Oxygen, nitrogen, argon, forming gas	Atmosphere-controlled syntheses

Experimental Workflow Visualization

Figure 1: Experimental workflow decision tree for selecting and implementing solid-state versus solution-based synthesis methodologies, highlighting key process steps and HEO-specific considerations.

The strategic selection between solid-state and solution-based synthesis methods represents a critical decision point in materials design, particularly for complex systems such as high-entropy oxides. Solid-state methods offer advantages in scalability, simplicity, and high-temperature stability, making them ideal for producing bulk ceramic materials where entropy-driven stabilization dominates at elevated temperatures. Solution-based approaches provide superior control over composition, morphology, and molecular-level structure, enabling access to metastable phases and nanostructured architectures. The emerging paradigm of thermodynamics-inspired synthesis emphasizes precise control of thermodynamic parameters—particularly oxygen chemical potential in HEO systems—to manipulate cation valence states and stabilize single-phase solid solutions across broader compositional ranges. As research advances toward targeted design of complex functional materials, the integration of methodological insights from both approaches, coupled with sophisticated thermodynamic guidance, will continue to expand the accessible materials space and enable unprecedented control over material properties and functionality.

Application Notes

Mechanochemical ball milling has emerged as a versatile, low-energy alternative to traditional high-temperature solid-state synthesis, demonstrating particular utility in the synthesis of advanced materials like high-entropy oxides (HEOs). This technique utilizes mechanical energy to drive chemical reactions in the solid state, often under ambient conditions and with minimal solvent use, aligning with green chemistry principles [30]. Its application is rapidly expanding across materials science, from synthesizing complex multicomponent ceramics to chemically recycling polymers [30] [31].

Within the context of thermodynamics-inspired synthesis of HEOs, mechanochemistry offers a distinct pathway to achieve the atomic-scale homogeneity required for entropy stabilization. While conventional HEO synthesis often relies on high-temperature calcination ((>1000^\circ\text{C})) to overcome kinetic barriers for single-phase formation, mechanochemistry can induce these reactions at or near room temperature through intensive mechanical mixing and activation [31]. This provides a complementary, and often less energy-intensive, route to explore the vast compositional space of HEOs, allowing researchers to navigate thermodynamic landscapes without sole reliance on thermal energy.

Key Advantages in High-Entropy Materials Synthesis

• Enhanced Reactivity and Diffusion: The process repeatedly fractures and welds precursor particles, creating fresh, highly reactive surfaces and reducing diffusion path lengths. This facilitates the incorporation of multiple cationic species into a single-phase structure, which is crucial for HEOs [31].
• Access to Metastable Phases: The non-equilibrium nature of ball milling can help form and stabilize high-entropy phases that might be inaccessible or difficult to obtain through conventional thermal routes [31].
• Direct Synthesis from Salts: As demonstrated in the synthesis of high-entropy layered double hydroxides (LDHs), mechanochemistry can directly transform metal salt mixtures into single-phase products without an intermediate aging stage, streamlining the synthesis protocol [32].

The following tables summarize key quantitative data from recent research, providing a basis for designing and optimizing mechanochemical protocols.

Table 1: Key Parameters and Outcomes in Mechanochemical Synthesis of High-Entropy Materials

Material Synthesized	Milling Frequency / Speed	Milling Time	Key Additives	Primary Outcome	Citation
MgCoNi/AlFeY Layered Double Hydroxide	300 rpm	30 minutes	NaOH (mass ratio to cations = 1:1)	Single-phase, crystalline HEO formed	[32]
MgCoNi/AlFeY Layered Double Hydroxide	200, 400 rpm	30 minutes	NaOH	Lower (200 rpm) and higher (400 rpm) speeds yielded less crystalline products compared to 300 rpm	[32]
MgCoNi/AlFeY Layered Double Hydroxide	300 rpm	1 - 120 minutes	NaOH	30 minutes determined as optimal; longer times decreased crystallinity	[32]

Table 2: Optimized Milling Parameters for Polymer Depolymerization (Non-HEO Context, Illustrative)

Milling Parameter	Optimal Condition	Impact on Reaction Outcome	Citation
Sphere Material	Heavy spheres	Maximizes mechanical force, boosting depolymerization yields	[33]
Milling Frequency	High frequency	Increases collision frequency, boosting depolymerization yields	[33]
Milling Temperature	Below (40^\circ\text{C})	Promotes brittle fracture of polymer chains over plastic deformation	[33]
Filling Degree	Low filling degree	Higher percentage yields, but causes significant tool wear	[33]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Mechanochemical Synthesis of a High-Entropy Layered Double Hydroxide (MgCoNi/AlFeY)

This protocol is adapted from a published procedure for synthesizing a hexacationic LDH, demonstrating the application of ball milling for high-entropy material formation [32].

3.1.1 Primary Reagents and Equipment

• Metal Salts: Magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Mg(NO₃)₂·6H₂O), Nickel nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO₃)₂·6H₂O), Cobalt(II) nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O), Aluminum nitrate nonahydrate (Al(NO₃)₃·9H₂O), Iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate (Fe(NO₃)₃·9H₂O), Yttrium nitrate hexahydrate (Y(NO₃)₃·6H₂O).
• Reactant: Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) pellets.
• Equipment: Planetary ball mill (e.g., FRITSCH Pulverisette 6). Grinding jar (500 mL volume). Grinding balls (40 balls, 10 mm diameter, stainless steel).

3.1.2 Step-by-Step Procedure

• Precursor Preparation: Weigh out the metal salts to achieve the desired cationic stoichiometry. For the reported MgCoNi/AlFeY LDH, the molar ratio of M(II) to M(III) was 3:1, with a specific cationic composition of Mg₁₅Co₁₅Ni₄₅/Al₂₀Fe₂.₅Y₂.₅ [32]. The total mass of salts used was 540 g.
• Mechanical Activation of Salts: Place the mixture of metal salts into the grinding jar with the milling balls. Secure the jar in the planetary ball mill and activate the mixture for a specified time. The optimized parameters are 300 rpm for 30 minutes [32].
• Addition of Sodium Hydroxide: After the initial activation, stop the mill and add the predetermined mass of NaOH pellets to the jar. The optimal mass ratio of cations to NaOH was found to be 1:1 [32]. Resume milling to thoroughly mix and react the NaOH with the activated salt mixture.
• Washing and Drying: Transfer the resulting viscous paste to a beaker. Wash repeatedly with distilled water until the filtrate reaches a neutral pH. Finally, dry the solid product at (100^\circ\text{C}) for 3 hours. Note that this protocol omits the traditional aging stage in the mother liquor [32].

Protocol 2: General Framework for Mechanochemical HEO Synthesis from Oxide Precursors

This protocol outlines a general approach for synthesizing rock salt HEOs, integrating the critical thermodynamic principle of oxygen chemical potential control.

3.2.1 Primary Reagents and Equipment

• Precursors: Binary oxide powders (e.g., MgO, NiO, CoO, MnO, FeO, ZnO).
• Milling Atmosphere: Argon (Ar) gas supply for creating an inert or low oxygen partial pressure environment.
• Equipment: High-energy ball mill (e.g., planetary mill or mixer mill) capable of being sealed and purged. Milling vials and balls (hardened steel, tungsten carbide, or zirconia).

3.2.2 Step-by-Step Procedure

• Stoichiometric Weighing: Weigh out equimolar quantities of the binary oxide precursors. Ensure cations have compatible ionic radii (within ~15%) to favor solid solution formation, as suggested by adapted Hume-Rothery rules [1].
• Milling Assembly and Atmosphere Control: Load the powder mixture and milling balls into the vial. Seal the vial and purge it with a continuous flow of argon to establish a low oxygen partial pressure ((p\text{O}2)) environment before and during milling. This is crucial for incorporating multivalent cations like Mn and Fe by coercing them into their divalent states, as their stability windows for the 2+ state overlap under reduced (p\text{O}2) [1].
• High-Energy Milling: Mill the powder mixture for a predetermined period (typically several hours) at a high frequency. Parameters must be optimized for the specific system, but heavy balls and high frequencies generally maximize mechanical energy transfer [33].
• Product Collection: After milling, collect the resulting powder in an inert atmosphere glovebox to prevent oxidation of the metastable high-entropy phase.

Workflow and Pathway Diagrams

Diagram 1: HEO synthesis workflow.

Diagram 2: Milling parameters and outcome relationships.

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials for Mechanochemical HEO Synthesis

Item Name	Function/Application Note
Binary Oxide Precursors (e.g., MgO, NiO, CoO, MnO, FeO)	High-purity ((>99\%)) powders serve as the primary cation sources for forming the HEO solid solution.
Argon Gas Supply	Creates an inert milling atmosphere with low oxygen partial pressure, crucial for stabilizing multivalent cations (Mn, Fe) in their 2+ oxidation state [1].
High-Hardness Milling Media (Tungsten Carbide, Zirconia)	Milling balls and jars made from hard materials ensure efficient energy transfer and minimize contamination from wear, which is critical for phase-pure synthesis [33].
Metal Salt Precursors (Nitrates, Chlorides)	Used in synthesizing non-oxide HEOs or as an alternative starting point for oxide HEOs, often requiring a subsequent calcination step [32].
Solid-State Reactants (e.g., NaOH)	Used as a reactant in mechanochemical synthesis, for example, to precipitate metal hydroxides from salts during the formation of layered double hydroxides (LDHs) [32].

The synthesis of advanced inorganic materials, particularly high-entropy oxides (HEOs), has emerged as a frontier in materials science. Traditional solid-state methods often face limitations in achieving the desired phase purity, homogeneity, and specific morphological characteristics at reduced energy costs. In response, advanced synthetic routes including hydrothermal, molten salt, and combustion techniques have been developed, offering enhanced control over material properties through careful manipulation of thermodynamic and kinetic parameters. These methods enable precise control over particle size, morphology, crystallinity, and compositional homogeneity by leveraging unique reaction environments—from aqueous solutions at elevated temperatures and pressures to molten salt media and exothermic redox reactions. This article details the application notes and experimental protocols for these advanced synthetic routes, framed within the context of thermodynamics-inspired design for HEOs and other complex metal oxides, providing researchers with practical guidance for implementing these techniques in their own laboratories.

Hydrothermal Synthesis

Application Notes

Hydrothermal synthesis utilizes heated aqueous solutions at elevated pressures to facilitate the crystallization of materials from solution. This method is particularly valuable for producing nanoparticles with controlled size distribution and high crystallinity without requiring post-synthesis calcination. The technique operates on the principle of enhancing the solubility and reactivity of precursors in a sealed system where temperature and pressure can be precisely controlled, leading to thermodynamically stable phases that might be inaccessible through conventional routes.

Recent applications demonstrate the versatility of hydrothermal methods. Highly dispersed antimony-doped tin oxide (ATO) nanoparticles were successfully synthesized via a one-step hydrothermal approach at 220°C for 12 hours, with the resulting particles exhibiting size-dependent electrochemical properties ideal for supercapacitor applications [34]. Similarly, VO₂ nanostructures for thermochromic window coatings have been produced through systematic optimization of hydrothermal parameters including reaction duration, temperature, tungsten doping level, and precursor pH [35]. The method has also been extended to carbon-based materials, where hydrothermal carbonization of glucose yielded amorphous carbon nanoparticles (15-150 nm) with precise size control and tunable photothermal/antioxidant properties [36].

Experimental Protocol: Synthesis of Sb-doped SnO₂ (ATO) Nanoparticles

Objective: To synthesize highly dispersed ATO nanoparticles for supercapacitor applications using a one-step hydrothermal method without post-sintering.

Materials:

• Sodium stannate (Na₂SnO₃, 98%)
• Potassium hexahydroxoantimonate (KSb(OH)₆, 99%)
• Hydrochloric acid (HCl)
• Deionized water

Procedure:

• Precursor Solution Preparation: Dissolve Na₂SnO₃ and KSb(OH)₆ in 1L deionized water (total metal ion concentration: 0.2 mol) with varying Sb/(Sn+Sb) molar ratios (0%, 10%, 30%, 50%).
• pH Adjustment: Slowly add HCl under stirring until the solution reaches pH 2.
• Hydrothermal Reaction: Transfer the solution to a Teflon-lined autoclave. Heat at 220°C for 12 hours with stirring at 200 rpm.
• Product Recovery: After cooling, filter the resulting green solution, wash repeatedly with distilled water to remove impurities, and dry the collected powder at 100°C for 1 hour.

Characterization: TEM analysis reveals a reduction in average particle size from approximately 12 nm to 6 nm as Sb doping increases from 0% to 30%. XRD confirms the tetragonal rutile structure of SnO₂ in all samples [34].

Workflow Diagram: Hydrothermal Synthesis

Molten Salt Assisted Synthesis (MSAS)

Application Notes

Molten salt assisted synthesis utilizes inorganic salts as a high-temperature reaction medium that facilitates atomic diffusion and mass transport at lower temperatures than solid-state reactions. The method combines advantages of both solid-phase and wet chemical methods, overcoming issues of high energy consumption, poor reactant contact, and difficult product structure control. The high-temperature homogenized reaction environment significantly promotes diffusion and mass transfer processes while enabling control over catalyst morphology, specific surface area, and porosity [37].

MSAS has demonstrated remarkable versatility across material classes. For high-entropy oxides, controlled oxygen chemical potential in molten salt systems enables the coercion of multivalent cations like Mn and Fe into divalent states within rock salt structures, expanding the compositional range of achievable HEOs [1] [27]. The technique has also been adapted for low-temperature synthesis (100-142°C) of solid-state emitting carbon dots with quantum yields up to 90%, achieved through zinc ion coordination in the liquated environment that facilitates precursor polymerization [38]. Additionally, molten salt systems have been employed for graphite synthesis through electrolysis on molten tin-salt interfaces, achieving faradaic efficiencies up to 96% and high carbon production rates [39].

Experimental Protocol: Synthesis of Rock Salt High-Entropy Oxides

Objective: To synthesize single-phase rock salt HEOs incorporating multivalent cations (Mn, Fe) through control of oxygen chemical potential.

Materials:

• Oxide precursors (MgO, CoO, NiO, MnO₂, Fe₂O₃, ZnO)
• Argon gas supply
• Salt mixture (appropriate for desired oxygen partial pressure)

Procedure:

• Precursor Preparation: Weigh appropriate stoichiometric ratios of oxide precursors to achieve equimolar cation compositions in the target HEO.
• Salt Mixing: Combine precursors with suitable salt mixture to control oxygen chemical potential.
• Heat Treatment: Load mixture in appropriate crucible and heat at 800-1000°C under controlled Ar flow to maintain low pO₂ (10⁻¹⁵-10⁻²².5 bar).
• Product Isolation: After holding at temperature for predetermined time (typically 2-12 hours), cool to room temperature, then wash with water to remove salt matrix.
• Drying: Dry purified powder at 80-100°C.

Characterization: XRD confirms single-phase rock salt structure. X-ray absorption fine structure analysis reveals predominantly divalent Mn and Fe states despite their inherent multivalent tendencies [1] [27].

Workflow Diagram: Molten Salt Synthesis

Solution Combustion Synthesis (SCS)

Application Notes

Solution combustion synthesis involves a self-sustaining exothermic reaction between metal nitrates (oxidizers) and organic fuels to produce fine-grained, high-purity oxide materials. The energy efficiency, simplicity, and ability to produce high-surface-area powders make SCS particularly attractive for catalyst and ceramic applications. The redox reaction proceeds through three main steps: formation of the combustion mixture, gel formation, and finally combustion of the gel at temperatures ranging from 80°C to >200°C [40].

The mixed-fuel approach to SCS has gained prominence for its enhanced control over product characteristics. By combining fuels with different decomposition temperatures and combustion characteristics, researchers can better control adiabatic combustion temperature, gaseous product evolution, and consequently, the morphology and physicochemical properties of the resulting materials. This approach has successfully produced SrAl₂O₄ powders that could not be obtained using single-fuel systems, highlighting the synergistic effects achievable with fuel mixtures [40]. Mixed-fuel SCS has found applications in diverse areas including ceramics, fuel cells, nanocomposite materials, and the recycling of lithium battery materials.

Experimental Protocol: Mixed-Fuel Combustion Synthesis

Objective: To synthesize metal oxide nanomaterials using mixed-fuel combustion approach for controlled morphology and surface area.

Materials:

• Metal nitrates (as oxidizers)
• Fuel mixture (e.g., glycine and urea, or citric acid and glycine)
• Deionized water

Procedure:

• Solution Preparation: Dissolve stoichiometric amounts of metal nitrates and mixed fuels in minimal deionized water.
• Gel Formation: Heat the solution at 80-100°C with continuous stirring to form a viscous gel.
• Combustion: Transfer the gel to a preheated furnace at 300-500°C to initiate self-propagating combustion.
• Product Collection: After the rapid combustion process (typically completes within minutes), collect the fluffy powder product.
• Post-processing: If necessary, lightly grind the product to break up soft agglomerates.

Characterization: The specific surface area and particle size distribution can be tuned by adjusting the fuel mixture ratio. For instance, using mixed citric acid, glycine, and oxalic acid fuels produced SrFeO₃-δ catalysts with higher specific surface area and smaller particle size compared to single-fuel systems [40].

Workflow Diagram: Combustion Synthesis

Comparative Analysis of Synthesis Methods

Table 1: Quantitative Comparison of Synthesis Parameters and Outcomes

Synthesis Method	Typical Temperature Range	Reaction Time	Key Advantages	Characteristic Products	Specific Performance Metrics
Hydrothermal	150-300°C	2-72 hours	High crystallinity without calcination, size control	ATO nanoparticles: 6-12 nm size [34]	Specific capacitance: 343.2 F·g⁻¹ at 1 A·g⁻¹ [34]
Molten Salt	100-1000°C	5 min - 12 hours	Morphology control, lower energy, atomic dispersion	Carbon dots: SS QY up to 99.86% [38]	Faradaic efficiency up to 96% for graphite [39]
Combustion	300-500°C (combustion)	Minutes (combustion step)	Rapid, energy-efficient, high surface area	SrFeO₃-δ with mixed fuel [40]	High surface area, reduced agglomeration [40]

Table 2: Thermodynamic Considerations in Synthesis Method Selection

Synthetic Parameter	Hydrothermal	Molten Salt	Combustion
Pressure Requirements	High (autogenous)	Ambient to low	Ambient
Energy Input	Moderate	Moderate to high	Low (self-propagating)
Entropy Utilization	Solution entropy, solubility	Cation diffusion, mixing entropy	Reaction enthalpy, gaseous products
Oxidation State Control	Precursor-dependent	Excellent via oxygen potential	Fuel-dependent redox potential
Scalability	Medium (autoclave size limited)	High	High

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Advanced Synthesis Methods

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function in Synthesis	Application Notes
Metal Precursors	Na₂SnO₃, KSb(OH)₆, SnCl₂·2H₂O, metal nitrates	Source of metal cations in final oxide	Choice affects solubility, reactivity, and impurities [34] [41]
Fuel Compounds	Glycine, urea, citric acid, oxalic acid	Reductant in combustion, chelating agent	Mixed fuels provide better temperature control [40]
Molten Salt Media	NaCl, KCl, ZnCl₂, carbonate mixtures	High-temperature solvent, reaction medium	Lower melting points enable milder conditions [38]
Structure Directors	CTAB, poly(ionic liquid)s, polyacrylate	Control particle size, prevent aggregation	Critical for nanomaterial morphology [40] [36]
Dopant Sources	KSb(OH)₆, tungsten precursors	Modify electronic structure, properties	Tungsten doping lowers VO₂ phase transition temperature [35]

Advanced synthesis methods including hydrothermal, molten salt, and combustion techniques provide powerful tools for materials researchers seeking to overcome the limitations of conventional solid-state synthesis. By understanding and manipulating thermodynamic parameters such as temperature, pressure, oxygen chemical potential, and enthalpy of reaction, these methods enable precise control over material structure and properties. The experimental protocols and application notes provided here offer practical guidance for implementing these techniques, particularly within the context of thermodynamics-inspired synthesis of complex metal oxides including high-entropy compositions. As materials demands continue to evolve toward more complex compositions and tailored properties, these advanced synthetic routes will play an increasingly important role in materials discovery and development.

Overcoming Synthesis Challenges and Optimizing HEO Properties

The incorporation of multivalent cations such as manganese (Mn) and iron (Fe) into high-entropy oxides (HEOs) represents a significant challenge and opportunity in materials design. These elements exhibit multiple stable oxidation states under different thermodynamic conditions, which can lead to phase instability when targeted for single-phase solid solutions. Traditional HEO synthesis has predominantly relied on temperature control under ambient oxygen partial pressure (pO₂), but this approach severely limits the compositional space accessible for HEO formation, particularly for cations with strong multivalent character [1].

Thermodynamics-inspired synthesis transcends this temperature-centric paradigm by treating oxygen chemical potential (μO₂) as an independent, decisive thermodynamic variable. By strategically navigating the multidimensional landscape of temperature and oxygen partial pressure, researchers can coercively stabilize multivalent cations into desired oxidation states, thereby enabling the synthesis of previously inaccessible HEO compositions [1] [27]. This Application Note details protocols for the successful incorporation of Mn and Fe into rock salt HEOs by leveraging thermodynamic principles, with methodologies that are chemically and structurally agnostic for broader applicability.

Thermodynamic Foundations

The Challenge of Multivalency in Mn and Fe

Manganese and iron possess inherent multivalent tendencies, which complicates their incorporation into single-phase HEOs. Mn, positioned at the center of the 3d-period with five unpaired electrons, can form diverse oxide structures and exhibits the largest number of highest oxidation states in the entire period. Under ambient atmospheric pressure, Mn commonly exists as tetragonal pyrolusite (MnO₂), transitioning to Mn₂O₃ at elevated temperatures [1]. Iron, following Mn in the periodic table, is stable as Fe₂O₃ in the hematite phase under ambient conditions. While both can adopt 2+ oxidation states, they require specific reducing conditions to maintain these states at synthesis temperatures [1].

The key thermodynamic challenge lies in identifying conditions where the valence stability windows of all constituent cations overlap, ensuring compatibility for single-phase solid solution formation. The ionic radii of Mn and Fe in both their 2+ and 3+ states remain within 15% of the cation radii in prototypical HEOs like MgCoNiCuZnO, satisfying the Hume-Rothery size compatibility criterion. However, their oxidation state instability under conventional synthesis conditions has prevented their successful incorporation until recently [1].

Oxygen Chemical Potential Overlap Concept

The concept of "oxygen chemical potential overlap" serves as a crucial descriptor for predicting HEO stability and synthesizability. This principle involves mapping the thermodynamic conditions where all constituent cations share a common stable oxidation state, typically the 2+ state for rock salt HEOs [1] [42].

Table 1: Stable Valence States of Cations Under Different Thermodynamic Conditions

Cation	Region 1 (Ambient pO₂, T > ~875°C)	Region 2 (Reduced pO₂)	Region 3 (Highly Reduced pO₂)
Mg	2+	2+	2+
Co	2+	2+	2+
Ni	2+	2+	2+
Cu	2+	Metallic	Metallic
Zn	2+	2+	2+
Mn	4+	2+	2+
Fe	3+	3+	2+

Table 2: Thermodynamic Regions for Valence Stability in HEO Synthesis

Region	Temperature Range	pO₂ Range	Stable Cations	Compatibility
1	> ~875°C	Ambient	Mg²⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Cu²⁺, Zn²⁺	Prototypical MgCoNiCuZnO
2	> ~800°C	~10⁻¹⁰–10⁻¹⁵ bar	Mg²⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Zn²⁺, Mn²⁺	Mn-containing, Cu-free HEOs
3	> ~800°C	~10⁻¹⁵–10⁻²².⁵ bar	Mg²⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Zn²⁺, Mn²⁺, Fe²⁺	Mn and Fe-containing, Cu-free HEOs

Through CALPHAD (Calculation of Phase Diagrams) methodology, researchers have constructed temperature–oxygen partial pressure phase diagrams that delineate specific regions where valence stability windows overlap for targeted cation cohorts [1]. Region 1 corresponds to conditions suitable for prototypical HEOs like MgCoNiCuZnO, where all cations persist in the 2+ state under ambient pressure and temperatures above approximately 875°C. As pO₂ decreases from Region 1, Mn reduces to 2+, marking the transition to Region 2, while further reductions stabilize Fe²⁺, defining Region 3 [1]. This thermodynamic mapping provides the foundational guidance for experimental synthesis parameters.

Experimental Protocols

Thermodynamics-Guided Synthesis Workflow

The following workflow diagram illustrates the integrated computational and experimental approach for thermodynamics-guided HEO synthesis:

Diagram 1: Integrated workflow for thermodynamics-guided synthesis of HEOs containing multivalent cations.

Computational Screening Protocol

Objective: Identify promising HEO compositions containing Mn and Fe with favorable enthalpic stability parameters before experimental synthesis.

Methodology:

• Define Cation Cohort: Select candidate cations (e.g., Mg, Ca, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn) based on periodic table position and potential for divalent state stabilization [1].
• Generate Composition Space: Enumerate all equimolar 4-, 5-, and 6-component compositions from the cation cohort.
• Calculate Stability Metrics:
  • Employ machine learning interatomic potentials (Crystal Hamiltonian Graph Neural Network - CHGNet) for high-throughput screening at near-density functional theory accuracy [1].
  • Compute mixing enthalpy (ΔHmix) representing the enthalpic barrier to single-phase formation.
  • Calculate bond length distribution (σbonds) quantifying lattice distortion through the standard deviation of relaxed first-neighbor cation-anion bond lengths.
• Construct Enthalpic Stability Map: Plot ΔHmix versus σbonds to identify compositions with minimal enthalpic barriers and lattice distortion [1].

Expected Outcomes: Compositions with both low ΔHmix (< threshold value) and low σbonds (< threshold value) present the most promising candidates for experimental synthesis. Research has identified six five-component Mn- and Fe-containing compositions (excluding Ca and Cu) that exhibit lower ΔHmix and σbonds values than the prototypical MgCoNiCuZnO [1].

CALPHAD Phase Diagram Construction

Objective: Determine precise temperature and pO₂ conditions where all constituent cations share overlapping valence stability windows.

Methodology:

• Gather Thermodynamic Data: Compile standard Gibbs free energy of formation data for all possible binary oxides of the constituent cations across the temperature range of interest (e.g., 400–1200°C) [1].
• Calculate Stability Boundaries: For each cation, determine the pO₂-dependent reduction reactions (e.g., Mn₂O₃ → 2MnO + ½O₂) and calculate the equilibrium pO₂ as a function of temperature using the relationship: ΔG° = -RT ln(K), where K is the equilibrium constant.
• Plot Phase Diagram: Construct a temperature versus log(pO₂) diagram with stability boundaries for each cation.
• Identify Overlap Regions: Locate regions where all cations maintain their desired oxidation state (typically 2+ for rock salt HEOs) [1].

Key Considerations:

• The diagram reveals that under ambient conditions, Mn predominantly adopts a 4+ oxidation state while Fe adopts 3+, explaining why conventional synthesis fails to incorporate these elements into single-phase rock salt HEOs [1].
• Regions 2 and 3 in the phase diagram (Table 2) define the synthesis conditions under which rock salt HEOs containing Mn and Fe, but not Cu, can be stabilized based on oxidation-state compatibility criteria [1].

Controlled Atmosphere Synthesis Protocol

Objective: Experimentally synthesize single-phase rock salt HEOs containing Mn and/or Fe through precise control of oxygen chemical potential.

Materials:

• Oxide precursors: MgO, MnO₂, Fe₂O₃, CoO, NiO, ZnO (purity ≥ 99.5%)
• Argon gas (high purity, ≥ 99.998%)
• Ball milling equipment (yttria-stabilized zirconia grinding media recommended)
• Hydraulic press for pelletization
• High-temperature furnace with controlled atmosphere capability
• Alumina crucibles

Procedure:

• Precursor Preparation: Weigh appropriate stoichiometric quantities of oxide precursors to achieve equimolar cation ratios in the target composition (total mass 2–3 g) [1].
• Mechanical Mixing: Transfer powders to ball mill container with appropriate grinding media. Mill for 12–24 hours at 200–300 RPM to ensure homogeneous mixing.
• Pelletization: Uniaxially press the mixed powders into pellets (10–15 mm diameter) at 200–300 MPa to enhance interparticle contact and reaction kinetics.
• Heat Treatment:
  • Place pellets in alumina crucibles and load into controlled atmosphere furnace.
  • For Mn-containing, Fe-free compositions: Set pO₂ to ~10⁻¹⁰–10⁻¹⁵ bar and temperature to 900–1000°C [1]. This corresponds to Region 2 in the phase diagram.
  • For Mn and Fe-containing compositions: Set pO₂ to ~10⁻¹⁵–10⁻²².⁵ bar and temperature to 900–1000°C [1]. This corresponds to Region 3 in the phase diagram.
  • Maintain reducing atmosphere through continuous Ar gas flow with controlled leak rate or mixed gas composition.
  • Dwell time: 6–12 hours at peak temperature.
  • Cool samples at controlled rates (2–5°C/min) under the same atmosphere.
• Post-processing: Gently grind pellets for characterization while avoiding contamination.

Critical Parameters:

• pO₂ control is essential – slight deviations can lead to phase separation or persistence of higher oxidation states.
• Cu-containing compositions require careful consideration as Cu reduces to metallic form under the reducing conditions needed for Mn and Fe incorporation [1].
• The synthesis starts with AO oxide mixtures under controlled, continuous Argon flow to maintain low pO₂, effectively steering different compositions toward a stable, single-phase rock salt structure [1].

Characterization and Validation Protocol

Objective: Confirm successful formation of single-phase HEOs with homogeneous cation distribution and target valence states.

Techniques and Procedures:

• Phase Purity Assessment (X-ray Diffraction):

  • Instrument: Powder X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation
  • Parameters: 2θ range 10–90°, step size 0.01–0.02°, collection time 1–2 seconds per step
  • Analysis: Identify all diffraction peaks and match to rock salt structure (FCC). Check for secondary phases with intensity threshold < 1–2% of primary phase considered acceptable for single-phase designation [1].

• Cation Homogeneity (Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy):

  • Instrument: Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with EDS detector
  • Parameters: Accelerating voltage 15–20 kV, multiple regions analyzed (≥5), spot size and counting time optimized for adequate counts
  • Analysis: Quantify cation ratios across multiple micro-regions. Standard deviation <5% of mean composition indicates acceptable homogeneity [1].

• Valence State Determination (X-ray Absorption Fine Structure):

  • Instrument: Synchrotron X-ray source for XAFS measurements
  • Parameters: Collect both XANES and EXAFS regions at Mn and Fe K-edges
  • Analysis: Compare edge positions and pre-edge features to standard compounds with known oxidation states. Linear combination fitting can quantify mixed valency if present [1].
  • Expected Outcome: Predominantly divalent Mn and Fe states, despite their inherent multivalent tendencies [1].

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Equipment for HEO Synthesis

Item	Specification	Function	Example Sources
Oxide Precursors	MgO, MnO₂, Fe₂O₃, CoO, NiO, ZnO (purity ≥ 99.5%)	Source of cationic components for HEO formation	Commercial chemical suppliers (e.g., Sigma-Aldrich, Alfa Aesar)
Controlled Atmosphere Furnace	Maximum temperature ≥ 1200°C, gas flow control, oxygen sensor capability	Maintain precise pO₂ during heat treatment	Specialized furnace manufacturers (e.g., Thermo Scientific, Carbolite Gero)
Inert Gas Supply	Argon, high purity (≥ 99.998%) with pressure regulator	Create and maintain oxygen-deficient atmosphere	Industrial gas suppliers (e.g., Air Liquide, Air Products)
Ball Milling Equipment	Planetary ball mill with yttria-stabilized zirconia vials and media	Homogenize precursor mixtures	Milling equipment specialists (e.g., Retsch, Fritsch)
X-ray Diffractometer	Powder XRD with Cu Kα source, Bragg-Brentano geometry	Phase identification and structure determination	Instrument manufacturers (e.g., Bruker, Panalytical)
Electron Microscope	SEM with EDS capability	Morphological analysis and elemental mapping	Instrument manufacturers (e.g., JEOL, Thermo Fisher)
XAFS Beamline Access	Synchrotron facility with suitable energy range	Local structure and valence state determination	National synchrotron facilities (e.g., APS, ALS, NSLS-II)

Practical Implementation Guide

Composition Selection Strategy

When designing new HEO compositions containing multivalent cations, consider the following hierarchy of criteria:

• Primary Screening:

  • Select cations capable of adopting the target oxidation state (typically 2+ for rock salt) under accessible laboratory conditions.
  • Mn and Fe are compelling candidates as they can adopt 2+ oxidation states under moderately reducing conditions compared to earlier transition metals like Ti, V, and Cr, which require extreme reducing conditions [1].
  • Ensure ionic radii compatibility – all cations should have ionic radii within 15% of each other in the target oxidation state.

• Secondary Screening:

  • Perform computational screening to identify compositions with low ΔHmix and σbonds.
  • Prioritize compositions that exclude problematic elements like Cu when targeting Mn and Fe incorporation, as Cu reduces to metallic form under the reducing conditions needed for Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺ stabilization [1].

• Tertiary Validation:

  • Construct temperature-pO₂ phase diagram for the specific cation cohort to identify the exact synthesis window.
  • Verify that laboratory equipment can achieve the required pO₂ and temperature conditions.

Troubleshooting Common Issues

Table 4: Troubles Guide for HEO Synthesis with Multivalent Cations

Issue	Possible Causes	Solutions
Persistent secondary phases	Incorrect pO₂ during synthesis; Insufficient reaction time	Calibrate oxygen sensor; Extend dwell time at peak temperature; Verify gas flow rates
Cation segregation	Inadequate precursor mixing; Incorrect cooling rate	Increase ball milling duration; Optimize cooling protocol (slower rate)
Unexpected oxidation states	pO₂ drift during cooling; Surface oxidation during handling	Maintain reducing atmosphere during cooling; Implement inert transfer protocols
Low product yield	Volatilization of components; Container reactions	Optimize temperature profile; Use inert crucible materials (alumina preferred)

The strategic incorporation of multivalent cations like Mn and Fe into HEOs requires a fundamental shift from temperature-centric to thermodynamics-inspired synthesis approaches. By treating oxygen chemical potential as an independent thermodynamic variable and leveraging computational screening tools, researchers can identify previously inaccessible compositional spaces and define precise synthesis conditions for successful HEO formation. The protocols outlined in this Application Note provide a systematic framework for navigating the multidimensional thermodynamic landscape of HEO synthesis, enabling the deliberate design of materials with tailored compositions and properties. The concept of oxygen chemical potential overlap serves as a powerful descriptor for predicting HEO stability and synthesizability, offering a broadly adaptable framework that transcends specific chemical systems or crystal structures.

Navigating Phase Diagrams for Optimal pO2 and Temperature Windows

In the thermodynamics-inspired synthesis of high-entropy oxides (HEOs), moving beyond a purely temperature-centric approach is a critical paradigm shift. The formation of single-phase, multicomponent materials is not guaranteed by configurational entropy alone; enthalpic contributions and precise thermodynamic processing conditions are equally vital [1]. Among these conditions, oxygen chemical potential (μO₂), often practically controlled via oxygen partial pressure (pO₂), emerges as a decisive thermodynamic variable. This application note provides a detailed framework for using temperature-pO₂ phase diagrams to identify the specific synthesis windows required to stabilize novel HEO compositions, with a particular focus on coercing multivalent cations into desired oxidation states.

Theoretical Foundation: The Role of Oxygen Chemical Potential

The stability of a high-entropy oxide is governed by the minimization of its chemical potential (Δμ = Δhmix - TΔsmix). While a high configurational entropy ( -TΔsmix ) is favorable, a significant enthalpic barrier (Δhmix) can prevent single-phase formation [1]. For cations with multiple stable oxidation states, this enthalpy is profoundly influenced by the pO₂ of the synthesis environment.

• Controlling Cation Valence: The pO₂ directly influences the stable oxidation state of transition metal cations in an oxide. For instance, under ambient pO₂, Mn and Fe typically exist as Mn⁴⁺ and Fe³⁺ in their binary oxides. However, by reducing the pO₂, these cations can be coerced into a divalent (2+) state, which is a prerequisite for their incorporation into many rock salt HEO structures [1].
• Oxygen Chemical Potential Overlap: The synthesizability of a multi-cation HEO requires that all constituent cations can exist in a compatible oxidation state simultaneously under a single set of temperature and pO₂ conditions. The concept of "oxygen chemical potential overlap" describes the pO₂-T window where the valence stability fields of all required cations overlap, creating a thermodynamic pathway for single-phase solid solution formation [1].

Constructing and Interpreting the Valence Stability Phase Diagram

A temperature-pO₂ phase diagram is an indispensable tool for predicting and rationalizing HEO synthesis conditions. The following protocol outlines its construction and interpretation.

Protocol: CALPHAD-Based Phase Diagram Construction

This methodology leverages CALPHAD (Calculation of Phase Diagrams) software and thermodynamic databases to map stable oxidation states.

• Objective: To delineate the regions of temperature and pO₂ where the binary oxides of candidate cations for a HEO share a common, compatible oxidation state.

• Materials & Software:

  • CALPHAD software (e.g., Thermo-Calc, FactSage)
  • Relevant thermodynamic database for oxide systems (e.g., TCOX, FTOxid)
  • List of candidate cations and their possible oxide phases

• Procedure:

  • Define the Cation Cohort: Select the cations for the target HEO (e.g., Mg, Co, Ni, Mn, Fe, Zn).
  • Set System Boundaries: For each cation, define the system as its binary oxide (e.g., Mn-O, Fe-O) and specify the range of temperatures and oxygen partial pressures relevant to synthesis (e.g., T: 500°C to 1200°C; pO₂: 10⁻²⁵ to 10⁰ bar).
  • Calculate Phase Equilibria: Use the CALPHAD software to compute the stable phases for each binary system across the defined T-pO₂ space.
  • Map Valence Stability Regions: For each cation, identify the T-pO₂ coordinates where the oxide phase with the target valence (e.g., MO for 2+ valence) is thermodynamically stable.
  • Identify the Overlap Region: Superimpose the valence stability maps for all cations in the cohort. The region where all target valence fields overlap represents the viable synthesis window.

Data Interpretation: A Case Study on Rock Salt HEOs

Applying this protocol to a cohort of 3d transition metals (Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn) reveals distinct synthesis regions, as summarized in the table below [1].

Table 1: Valence Stability Regions in a T-pO₂ Phase Diagram for 3d Transition Metal Oxides [1]

Region	Approximate Conditions (pO₂, T)	Stable Cation Valences	Compatible HEO Composition	Key Constraint
Region 1	Ambient pO₂, T > ~875°C	Mg²⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Cu²⁺, Zn²⁺	Prototypical (MgCoNiCuZn)O	CuO reduces and Cu melts if pO₂ is lowered.
Region 2	Low pO₂ (~10⁻¹⁵ to 10⁻²² bar), T > ~800°C	Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Zn²⁺	Cu-free, Mn-containing HEOs	Fe remains in 3+ state.
Region 3	Very Low pO₂ (~10⁻²² bar and below), T > ~800°C	Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺, Fe²⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Zn²⁺	Cu-free, Mn- and Fe-containing HEOs	All cations stable as 2+; extreme reducing conditions.

The accompanying workflow diagram illustrates the logical process of using this phase diagram to select synthesis parameters.

Experimental Protocol: Controlled Atmosphere Synthesis

Once the thermodynamic window is identified, this protocol details the experimental steps for synthesis via a solid-state reaction under controlled atmosphere.

• Objective: To synthesize a single-phase rock salt HEO containing multivalent cations (e.g., Mn, Fe) by maintaining a low pO₂ environment throughout the high-temperature treatment.
• Research Reagent Solutions:

Table 2: Essential Materials for Controlled pO₂ Synthesis of HEOs

Item	Function	Example / Specification
Precursor Oxides	Source of metal cations.	High-purity (>99.9%) fine powders of MO, M₂O₃, etc. (e.g., Mn₂O₃, Fe₂O₃).
Inert Gas Flow	Creates a low-pO₂ atmosphere by purging the furnace.	High-purity Argon or Nitrogen gas, with oxygen getter/filter.
Tube Furnace	Provides high-temperature environment with atmosphere control.	Capable of reaching 1000-1500°C, with gas inlet/outlet ports.
Crucible	Holds the powder sample during reaction.	Chemically inert material (e.g., Alumina (Al₂O₃), Platinum).

• Step-by-Step Procedure:
  • Powder Preparation: Weigh out equimolar quantities of the precursor oxide powders to achieve the desired cation stoichiometry (e.g., for (MgCoNiMnZn)O, use MgO, CoO, NiO, Mn₂O₃, and ZnO). Note: Mn and Fe are typically added as M₂O₃.
  • Mixing: Mechanically mix the powders for at least 30 minutes using a ball mill or mortar and pestle to ensure initial homogeneity.
  • Furnace Setup: Place the mixed powder in an appropriate crucible. Load the crucible into the tube furnace. Seal the furnace tubes.
  • Atmosphere Purging: Initiate a continuous flow of high-purity Argon gas through the furnace tube. A high flow rate for 15-30 minutes is recommended to purge all residual oxygen from the system before heating.
  • Reaction Sintering:
    • Heat the furnace to the target temperature (e.g., 1000°C) at a ramp rate of 5-10°C per minute.
    • Maintain the temperature and continuous Ar flow for a dwell time of 4-12 hours. This prolonged annealing allows for cation interdiffusion and phase stabilization.
    • After the dwell time, cool the sample to room temperature under continued Ar flow to prevent oxidation of the metastable phase upon cooling.
  • Product Characterization: The resulting powder should be characterized by X-ray Diffraction (XRD) to confirm the formation of a single-phase rock salt structure. Elemental homogeneity can be verified with Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS), and cation valence states can be confirmed using X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS) analysis [1].

Alternative Synthesis Pathway: Electrical Explosion of Wires (EEW)

For the synthesis of HEO nanopowders, non-equilibrium methods like Electrical Explosion of Wires (EEW) offer a complementary approach.

• Principle: A pulsed high current rapidly heats a combination of metal wires, causing vaporization and reaction with an ambient gas (e.g., oxygen) to form nanoparticles via ultra-fast quenching (~10¹⁰ K/s) [43].
• Protocol Summary:
  • Wire Preparation: Combine thin wires of the constituent metals (e.g., Fe, Co, NiCr alloy, Ti, Cu) in the reaction chamber.
  • Chamber Conditioning: Evacuate the chamber and fill with high-pressure oxygen.
  • Electrical Explosion: Discharge a high-voltage capacitor through the wires, resulting in their simultaneous explosion and reaction with oxygen.
  • Product Collection: Collect the resulting nanopowder on a filter membrane [43].
• Outcome: This method has successfully produced HEOs with rock salt and spinel structures, yielding nanopowders with a particle size of 20-40 nm and comparatively homogeneous element distribution [43].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Analytical Methods for Validation

The following techniques are critical for validating the success of a thermodynamics-inspired HEO synthesis.

• X-ray Diffraction (XRD): Essential for confirming the formation of a single-phase crystal structure (e.g., rock salt) and the absence of secondary phases.
• Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS): Used to map elemental distribution and confirm cation homogeneity at the micro- or nanoscale.
• X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS): Provides direct evidence of the local coordination and average oxidation state of cations within the HEO structure, confirming successful coercion to the divalent state [1].

Navigating phase diagrams to identify optimal pO₂ and temperature windows is a powerful strategy for expanding the compositional space of high-entropy oxides. By prioritizing oxygen chemical potential as a primary synthesis variable, researchers can thermodynamically guide the formation of single-phase materials containing cations like Mn and Fe in a divalent state. The protocols outlined herein—for thermodynamic modeling, controlled atmosphere solid-state synthesis, and validation—provide a replicable framework for the targeted and rational discovery of new HEOs with tailored properties.

Addressing Cation Size Mismatch and Lattice Strain

High-entropy oxides (HEOs) represent a paradigm shift in ceramic materials design, leveraging configurational entropy to stabilize multiple cation species within a single-phase crystal structure. Within the framework of thermodynamics-inspired synthesis, managing the inherent cation size mismatch and resultant lattice strain is crucial for achieving stable, single-phase materials. The thermodynamic stability of HEOs is governed by the balance between mixing enthalpy (ΔHmix) and the entropic contribution (-TΔSmix) to the Gibbs free energy (ΔGmix = ΔHmix - TΔSmix) [1] [44]. While entropy promotes mixing, excessive lattice strain from cation size disparities can increase ΔHmix beyond critical thresholds, leading to phase separation. This application note establishes protocols for quantitatively assessing and mitigating these challenges, enabling successful synthesis of novel HEO compositions.

Quantitative Assessment of Stability and Lattice Distortion

Key Stability Descriptors for HEO Design

The formation and stability of single-phase HEOs can be predicted using quantitative descriptors derived from thermodynamic and structural calculations. The following table summarizes the key metrics used for assessing HEO stability.

Table 1: Key Quantitative Descriptors for HEO Stability Assessment

Descriptor	Symbol	Optimal Range	Significance in HEO Stability
Mixing Enthalpy	ΔHmix	Low or negative values [1]	Represents the enthalpic barrier to single-phase formation; lower values favor stability.
Bond Length Distribution	σbonds	< ~0.1 Å [1]	Quantifies lattice distortion via standard deviation of cation-anion bond lengths; lower values indicate less structural strain.
Configurational Entropy	ΔSconfig	> 1.5R [31]	Stabilizes solid solutions at high temperatures; must be sufficient to overcome positive ΔHmix.
Oxygen Chemical Potential Overlap	μO₂	Region where all cations share a stable oxidation state [1]	A novel descriptor predicting synthesizability by ensuring oxidation state compatibility under specific pO₂.

Cation Compatibility and Hume-Rothery Inspired Rules

Adapting the metallic Hume-Rothery rules for ceramics provides effective guidelines for predicting solid solution formation. For rock salt HEOs, critical criteria include:

• Cation Radius Compatibility: The ionic radii of constituent cations should differ by less than 15% to minimize lattice strain [1]. For instance, in the prototypical (MgCoNiCuZn)O HEO, the largest disparity is 8% between Ni²⁺ and Co²⁺, which is within the acceptable limit.
• Valence Compatibility: Cations should favor and maintain a common oxidation state under the chosen synthesis conditions [1]. This is why incorporating persistent Sc³⁺ into equimolar rock salt HEOs is challenging, and why controlling oxygen chemical potential is essential for coercing multivalent cations like Mn and Fe into a 2+ state.
• Electronegativity Compatibility: Minimal variation in cation electronegativity promotes solid solution formation [1].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Thermodynamic Calculation of Phase Stability

This protocol outlines the use of computational tools to predict stable HEO compositions and their required synthesis conditions.

Methodology:

• High-Throughput Enthalpic Mapping:
  • Leverage machine learning interatomic potentials (e.g., Crystal Hamiltonian Graph Neural Network - CHGNet) to compute the mixing enthalpy (ΔHmix) and bond length distribution (σbonds) for a wide range of candidate compositions [1].
  • Plot these values on an enthalpic stability map to identify compositions with simultaneously low ΔHmix and low σbonds [1].
• CALPHAD Phase Diagram Construction:
  • Calculate temperature–oxygen partial pressure (T-pO₂) phase diagrams for the constituent binary oxides using CALPHAD-based software [1].
  • Identify regions (e.g., Region 2 and 3 in [1]) where the valence stability windows of all cations overlap. For Mn/Fe-containing rock salt HEOs, this corresponds to low pO₂ conditions where Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺ are stable.

Workflow Visualization:

Protocol 2: Synthesis of Mn/Fe-Containing Rock Salt HEOs Under Controlled Atmosphere

This protocol details the experimental procedure for synthesizing HEOs with multivalent cations, based on the thermodynamic guidance from Protocol 1.

Materials:

• Precursor oxides: MgO, CoO, NiO, ZnO, MnO₂, Fe₂O₃ (purity ≥ 99.9%)
• High-purity Argon gas stream
• Tube furnace with gas flow controls

Methodology:

• Precursor Preparation:
  • Weigh precursor oxides in equimolar cation ratios.
  • Use high-energy ball milling (e.g., 400 rpm for 10-20 hours) with zirconia balls to achieve intimate precursor mixing and reduce particle size, enhancing atomic diffusion [45] [31].
• High-Temperature Synthesis under Controlled pO₂:
  • Place the mixed powder in an alumina crucible and load it into a tube furnace.
  • Purge the furnace tube with high-purity Argon for a minimum of 30 minutes to remove residual oxygen.
  • Initiate a continuous flow of Argon (e.g., 100-200 sccm) to maintain a low oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) atmosphere throughout the thermal cycle. This accesses Regions 2 and 3 of the T-pO₂ diagram, coercing Mn and Fe into their 2+ states [1].
  • Heat the sample to a high temperature (e.g., 900-1000 °C) at a rate of 5-10 °C/min and hold for 5-12 hours to facilitate single-phase formation [1] [45].
• Quenching:
  • After the dwell time, rapidly quench the sample to room temperature, typically by sliding it out of the hot zone into a cooler part of the tube furnace under continuous Ar flow. This kinetically "locks in" the high-entropy phase [31].

Protocol 3: Characterization of Phase Purity and Lattice Strain

Methodology:

• X-Ray Diffraction (XRD):
  • Perform XRD analysis on the synthesized powder to confirm single-phase formation and crystal structure (e.g., rock salt) [1] [45].
  • Refine the XRD pattern using Rietveld analysis to determine the lattice parameter. A lattice parameter that closely follows the rule of mixtures, coupled with the absence of secondary phase peaks, indicates successful solid solution formation [46].
• Microstructural and Chemical Analysis:
  • Use Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) for elemental mapping to verify a homogeneous cation distribution [1] [45].
• Local Structure and Oxidation State Analysis:
  • Employ X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS) analysis to probe the local coordination environment and confirm the dominant oxidation states of cations (e.g., confirming Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺) [1].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Materials and Reagents for HEO Synthesis

Item	Function/Application	Key Considerations
High-Purity Precursor Oxides/Carbonates	Source of cationic elements.	Purity ≥ 99.9% to avoid unintended dopants that can trigger phase separation [45].
Controlled Atmosphere Furnace	High-temperature synthesis under defined pO₂.	Must be capable of maintaining a continuous inert (Ar) or reducing gas flow with precise temperature control up to 1500°C [1].
High-Energy Planetary Ball Mill	Intimate mixing of precursors and particle size reduction.	Zirconia milling media is recommended to prevent contamination. Milling time and speed are critical for homogeneity [45] [31].
CALPHAD Software & MLIPs	Thermodynamic modeling and stability prediction.	Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIPs) like CHGNet enable high-throughput screening with near-DFT accuracy [1].

Successfully addressing cation size mismatch and lattice strain is fundamental to the thermodynamics-inspired synthesis of high-entropy oxides. By integrating computational stability descriptors like mixing enthalpy and bond length distribution with controlled synthesis parameters—especially oxygen chemical potential—researchers can strategically navigate the complex thermodynamic landscape. The protocols outlined herein provide a robust framework for the rational design and synthesis of novel, single-phase HEOs, expanding the compositional space for materials with contemporary property interest.

The Impact of Synthesis Method on Microstructure and Homogeneity

High-entropy oxides (HEOs), characterized by their crystalline structure hosting multiple principal cations in near-equimolar ratios, represent a paradigm shift in ceramic materials design [20] [2]. The foundational principle of these materials leverages high configurational entropy to stabilize single-phase solid solutions from multiple constituent elements, an concept extended from high-entropy alloys (HEAs) [20]. Within the broader thesis of thermodynamics-inspired synthesis, this application note addresses a critical, HEO-specific challenge: the profound impact of the synthesis route on the resulting material's microstructure, cation homogeneity, and ultimate functional properties. While thermodynamic parameters like entropy are pivotal for phase stability, the synthesis method dictates the kinetic pathway to achieve that state, making it a decisive factor in determining the real-world structure and performance of HEOs [47]. The choice of synthesis protocol directly influences atomic-scale order, mesoscale homogeneity, and bulk microstructure, thereby enabling or impeding the manifestation of the desired "high-entropy effect" [20] [47]. This document provides a detailed comparison of prevalent HEO synthesis methods, their experimental protocols, and their consequent impacts on microstructure and homogeneity, serving as a guide for researchers aiming to tailor HEOs for applications in energy storage, electronics, and catalysis.

Synthesis Methods and Microstructural Outcomes

The synthesis of HEOs can be broadly categorized into solid-state (equilibrium) and chemical (often non-equilibrium) routes, each employing different thermodynamic and kinetic conditions to form the multi-cation crystalline phase [20] [47].

Table 1: Comparison of Common HEO Synthesis Methods and Structural Outcomes

Synthesis Method	Key Thermodynamic/Kinetic Conditions	Typical Phases/Microstructure	Cation Homogeneity	Key Structural Findings
Solid-State Reaction	High temperature (>1000°C), slow reaction kinetics, near-equilibrium [47]	Single-phase rock-salt, spinel, etc.; potential for minor impurity phases (e.g., rock-salt in spinel) [47]	Prone to cation clustering and chemical inhomogeneity; broader distribution of lattice parameters [47]	Largest XRD FWHM, indicating inhomogeneity; endothermic DSC behavior [47]
Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS)	Rapid heating, simultaneous pressure and temperature application [20]	Dense bulk materials; used to consolidate powders from other methods [20]	Varies with precursor powder homogeneity	Enables formation of bulk nanocrystalline HEOs with multiscale phase homogeneity [20]
Co-precipitation	Moderate temperatures during calcination, solution-based precursor mixing [20]	Single-phase structures; homogeneous nanoparticles [20]	High degree of cation homogeneity achievable	Allows for precise control over cation stoichiometry in precursor [20]
Sol-Gel Method	Low to moderate calcination temperatures, molecular-level mixing in solution [20]	Single-phase structures; can produce thin films or powders [20]	High degree of cation homogeneity achievable	Flexible route for various morphologies; uses metal alkoxides/organics [20]
Hydrothermal Synthesis	Moderate temperature and pressure, solvent-mediated [47]	Single-phase spinel; high crystalline quality [47]	Intermediate cation homogeneity	Slower reaction kinetics may lead to some cation clustering [47]
Combustion Synthesis	Rapid, exothermic reaction, kinetically driven [47]	Single-phase spinel; high crystalline quality [47]	Near-ideal, homogeneous cation distribution [47]	Fast kinetics "freeze" a homogeneous state; symmetric XRD peaks [47]
Molten Salt Synthesis	Moderate temperature, liquid reaction medium [47]	Single-phase spinel; high crystalline quality [47]	Intermediate cation homogeneity	Slower reaction kinetics may lead to some cation clustering [47]
High-Pressure Synthesis	Extreme pressure, modified thermodynamic stability [47]	Single-phase spinel [47]	Altered cation configuration, potentially metastable	DSC shows lower decomposition temperature, suggesting trapped metastable states [47]
Electrical Explosion of Wires (EEW)	Ultra-fast heating/quenching (~10¹¹ K/s), non-equilibrium [48]	Rock-salt (FeCoNiCrCu)O; Spinel (FeCoNiCrTi)O; or multiphase	Homogeneous nanoscale distribution (20-40 nm particles)	First-time synthesis of HEO nanopowders via EEW; single-step process [48]

A pivotal study on the spinel HEO (Cr,Mn,Fe,Co,Ni)₃O₄ synthesized via five different methods—solid-state, high-pressure, hydrothermal, molten salt, and combustion—demonstrates that while the average crystal structure remains consistent across all samples, significant differences emerge at the local and micro-scale [47]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) confirmed that all five methods produced high-crystallinity samples with negligible variation in lattice parameters (less than 0.005 Å) [47]. However, the solid-state sample exhibited the largest full width at half maximum (FWHM) in XRD, indicative of chemical inhomogeneity or a broader distribution of lattice parameters, not smaller crystallite size [47]. Furthermore, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) revealed that the high-pressure sample had a markedly different thermal decomposition profile, decomposing at ~1000 K compared to ~1400 K for the others, suggesting the presence of kinetically trapped, metastable cation configurations [47]. The most profound difference was observed in cation homogeneity, as revealed by x-ray fluorescence microscopy: only combustion synthesis achieved ideal, homogeneous cation distribution, attributed to its fast reaction kinetics that freeze a well-mixed state [47].

Thermodynamic Framework and Advanced Stabilization Protocols

Recent advances in HEO synthesis transcend a purely temperature-centric view, incorporating a multidimensional thermodynamic understanding where oxygen chemical potential (μO₂) becomes a critical parameter for stabilizing challenging compositions [1] [49] [5]. This is particularly relevant for incorporating multivalent cations like Mn and Fe, which are compelling candidates due to their suitable ionic radii but inherent tendency to adopt 3+ or 4+ oxidation states under ambient conditions.

Protocol: Thermodynamics-Driven Synthesis for Mn/Fe-containing Rock Salt HEOs

This protocol, based on the work by Almishal et al., details the stabilization of rock salt HEOs by controlling the oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) during synthesis to coerce Mn and Fe into the 2+ oxidation state [1] [49].

• Principle: By performing synthesis under a controlled, low pO₂ atmosphere, the thermodynamic stability windows of the divalent cations (Mg²⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Mn²⁺, Fe²⁺) are made to overlap, enabling single-phase rock salt formation [1].
• Materials:
  • Precursors: High-purity (>99.9%) binary oxide powders (MgO, CoO, NiO, MnO, FeO) or their carbonate/oxalate precursors. For the protocol described, binary oxide mixtures (AO) are used as the starting material [1].
  • Equipment: Tube furnace with gas flow control system; high-purity Argon (Ar) gas supply; alumina crucibles.
• Procedure:
  • Precursor Preparation: Weigh the binary oxide powders in an equimolar cation ratio (e.g., for a 5-cation HEO, use a 1:1:1:1:1 molar ratio). The total cation quantity is typically 2-5 g for lab-scale synthesis.
  • Mixing: Mechanically mix the powders using a ball mill (e.g., zirconia balls in isopropyl alcohol medium) for 12-24 hours to ensure initial homogeneity.
  • Pelletization: Uniaxially press the mixed powder into dense pellets (e.g., 10-12 mm diameter) at a pressure of 100-200 MPa to maximize inter-particle contact.
  • Low pO₂ Synthesis:
    • Place the pellets in an alumina crucible and load them into the tube furnace.
    • Seal the furnace tube and purge with a continuous flow of high-purity Ar gas. The Ar flow establishes a low-oxygen atmosphere.
    • Heat the furnace to a high temperature, typically in the range of 875–950 °C, with a standard heating rate of 5°C/min.
    • Hold at the target temperature for 5-10 hours to allow for sufficient cation inter-diffusion and single-phase formation.
    • Cool the samples to room temperature, either by furnace cooling or controlled cooling, under continuous Ar flow.
• Characterization & Validation:
  • Phase Purity: Confirm single-phase rock salt formation using X-ray Diffraction (XRD).
  • Cation Distribution: Verify homogeneous cation distribution using Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) mapping.
  • Oxidation State: Critically, use X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS) analysis to confirm that Mn and Fe are predominantly in the 2+ oxidation state, validating the success of the low pO₂ synthesis [1] [49].

This framework led to the successful synthesis of seven novel, single-phase rock salt HEO compositions incorporating Mn, Fe, or both, which had previously eluded conventional ambient-pressure synthesis routes [49].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for HEO Synthesis

Reagent/Material	Function in HEO Synthesis	Example Use Case
Binary Oxide Powders (MgO, CoO, NiO, etc.)	High-purity starting materials for solid-state and other synthesis routes.	Direct mixing for solid-state reaction [47].
Metal Nitrate/Carbonate Salts	Soluble precursors for solution-based methods (co-precipitation, sol-gel).	Provides molecular-level mixing for improved homogeneity [20].
Metal Alkoxides	Precursors for the sol-gel method, enabling formation of metal-oxygen networks.	Used for synthesis of thin films or homogeneous powders [20].
Organic Fuels (e.g., Glycine, Urea)	Act as complexing and reducing agents in combustion synthesis.	Fuels the exothermic reaction in combustion synthesis, promoting homogeneity [47].
Molten Salt Flux (e.g., NaCl-KCl)	Liquid reaction medium in molten salt synthesis, enhancing diffusion.	Lowers reaction temperature and improves crystallinity [47].
High-Purity Argon Gas	Inert gas for creating a controlled, low pO₂ atmosphere during synthesis.	Essential for thermodynamics-driven synthesis to stabilize divalent cations [1] [49].
Metal Wires (e.g., Fe, Co, Ni, Cr, Cu)	Raw materials for the Electrical Explosion of Wires (EEW) method.	Used for synthesizing HEO nanopowders with different crystal structures [48].
Oxygen Gas	Reactive atmosphere for synthesis methods requiring oxidation.	Used as the ambient gas in the EEW method to form oxide nanopowders [48].

The synthesis method is not merely a tool for creating high-entropy oxides but is a fundamental determinant of their microstructure and cation homogeneity. As demonstrated, methods with fast kinetics like combustion synthesis can achieve superior cation mixing, while thermodynamics-inspired approaches using controlled oxygen potential unlock previously inaccessible compositions [1] [47] [49]. The choice of protocol directly influences atomic-scale structure, local cation ordering, and mesoscale morphology, which in turn dictate functional properties from magnetism to electrochemical performance [47]. Therefore, the selection and optimization of a synthesis method must be an intentional decision, aligned with the target properties and guided by thermodynamic principles. This application note underscores that in the complex landscape of HEOs, controlling the pathway of synthesis is as crucial as designing the final composition for achieving desired material characteristics.

Designing Carbon-Supported HEOs for Enhanced Electrochemical Performance

Application Notes

Thermodynamic Principles for HEO Synthesis

The synthesis of single-phase high-entropy oxides (HEOs) is governed by fundamental thermodynamic principles. The stability of a solid solution is determined by the Gibbs free energy equation: ΔGmix = ΔHmix - TΔSmix, where a negative ΔGmix favors formation. For HEOs, the high configurational entropy (ΔSmix) from multiple cationic components can overcome positive enthalpy contributions (ΔHmix) to stabilize single-phase structures. [50] In a five-component equimolar system, the theoretical configurational entropy reaches ΔS = R × ln5 = 1.61R, providing significant driving force for stabilization. [50]

Recent research demonstrates that HEO thermodynamics must consider multidimensional landscapes where oxygen chemical potential (μO₂) plays a decisive role alongside temperature. [1] [27] By precisely controlling oxygen partial pressure (pO₂) during synthesis, multivalent cations can be coerced into divalent states within rock salt HEO structures, enabling incorporation of elements like Mn and Fe that would otherwise form separate phases under ambient conditions. [1] This thermodynamic framework provides a powerful approach for expanding the compositional space of synthesizable HEOs.

Advantages of Carbon-Supported HEO Architectures

Carbon-supported HEO architectures offer significant advantages for electrochemical applications through synergistic effects:

• Enhanced Conductivity: Carbon matrices (graphene, carbon black) establish efficient 3D electron conduction networks, reducing electrode resistance below 10 Ω/sq and enabling high power density operation. [51]
• Structural Stabilization: Carbon substrates provide strong metal-support interaction through oxygen functional groups, suppressing nanoparticle sintering and agglomeration during synthesis and operation. [52]
• Morphological Control: Carbon supports with high specific surface area (up to 350 m²/g) enable dense dispersion of HEO nanoparticles while maintaining accessibility to active sites. [52]
• Dual Storage Mechanisms: The combination of HEO redox activity with carbon electric double-layer capacitance enables synergistic charge storage, particularly beneficial for hybrid supercapacitors and battery applications. [51]

Table 1: Performance Advantages of Carbon-Supported HEO Systems

Material System	Specific Surface Area	Electrochemical Performance	Stability	Reference
HEO Hollow Nanocubes	Not specified	Rate constant k = 1.79 min⁻¹ for p-nitrophenol hydrogenation	>95% conversion over 10 cycles	[53]
Graphene-supported HEA-NPs	350 m²/g	ORR mass activity: 1.94 A mgPt⁻¹ @ 0.90 V vs RHE	High stability under thermal processing	[52]
Carbon/HEA Nanocomposites	2630 m²/g (theoretical)	Enhanced Li⁺ diffusion coefficients vs graphite	800+ cycles with double capacity of silicon anodes	[51]

Experimental Protocols

Thermodynamics-Inspired Synthesis of Rock Salt HEOs

Principle

This protocol enables synthesis of single-phase rock salt HEOs containing multivalent cations (Mn, Fe) by controlling oxygen chemical potential to coerce cations into divalent states, based on the thermodynamic framework established by Almishal et al. [1]

Materials

• Cation Precursors: Metal acetates or chlorides of Mg, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe (purity ≥99.9%)
• Oxygen Chemical Potential Control: Argon gas (high purity, 99.999%) with controlled oxygen partial pressure
• Processing Equipment: Tube furnace with gas flow control system

Procedure

• Precursor Preparation: Prepare equimolar mixtures of metal salts dissolved in deionized water with total metal concentration of 0.5M.
• Solution Processing: Use spray drying or freeze drying to obtain homogeneous precursor powder.
• Thermal Treatment under Controlled Atmosphere:
  • Load precursor powder into alumina crucible
  • Place in tube furnace with continuous Ar gas flow (2 L/min)
  • Heat to 850-950°C with ramp rate of 5°C/min
  • Hold for 4-12 hours at synthesis temperature
  • Cool naturally to room temperature under continued Ar flow
• Phase Characterization: Validate single-phase rock salt structure by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and homogeneous cation distribution by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

Thermodynamic Optimization

• For Mn-containing HEOs: Use pO₂ corresponding to Region 2 in phase diagrams (enables Mn²⁺ stabilization) [1]
• For Fe-containing HEOs: Use pO₂ corresponding to Region 3 in phase diagrams (enables Fe²⁺ stabilization) [1]
• Avoid Cu-containing compositions in low pO₂ conditions due to Cu reduction and melting

Hydrocarbothermal Flow Synthesis of Carbon-Supported HEOs

Principle

This continuous-flow method enables synthesis of carbon-supported HEO nanoparticles with small size (<2 nm) and high metal loading (~30 wt%) through in situ hydrocarbothermal reduction mechanism. [52]

Materials

• Metal Precursors: Chloride salts of target transition metals (Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Pt, etc.)
• Carbon Support: Graphene oxide (GO) dispersion (2 mg/mL) or carbon black
• Equipment: Ultrasonic atomizer, tube furnace (850°C), aerosol collection system

Procedure

• Precursor Dispersion Preparation:
  • Dissolve metal salts in GO aqueous dispersion
  • Achieve total metal concentration of 0.1M with equimolar ratios
  • Maintain good colloidal stability (sonicate if necessary)
• Spray Pyrolysis Setup:
  • Connect ultrasonic atomizer to tube furnace with Ar carrier gas (2 L/min)
  • Preheat furnace to 850°C
  • Set up filter collector at reactor outlet
• Continuous Flow Synthesis:
  • Nebulize precursor dispersion to generate aerosol droplets
  • Pass droplets through heating zone (residence time ~3 seconds)
  • Collect resulting powder on filter collector
• Post-processing:
  • Characterize nanoparticle size distribution by TEM
  • Determine metal loading by ICP-MS
  • Analyze crystal structure by XRD

Key Advantages

• Gram-scale production with high reproducibility
• Small nanoparticle size (1.62 ± 0.83 nm for FeCoNiCuPt/G)
• High metal loading (up to 36.7 wt%)
• Strong metal-support interaction prevents sintering

Coordination Etching Strategy for HEO Hollow Nanocubes

Principle

This template-assisted method enables synthesis of multicomponent HEO hollow nanocubes (ternary to octonary) through controlled coordinating etching and precipitation at low temperature. [53]

Materials

• Template: Cu₂O nanocubes (synthesized separately)
• Coordinating Etchant: Sodium thiosulfate (Na₂S₂O₃) solution (0.1M)
• Metal Precursors: Chloride or nitrate salts of target metals (Ni, Co, Fe, Cd, Cr, etc.)

Procedure

• Cu₂O Template Synthesis: Prepare monodisperse Cu₂O nanocubes (~500 nm) by reduction method.
• Coordinating Etching Reaction:
  • Disperse Cu₂O nanocubes in aqueous solution containing metal salts
  • Slowly add Na₂S₂O₃ solution (0.1M) under stirring
  • Maintain reaction at 60°C for 2 hours
• HEO Hollow Nanocube Formation:
  • Centrifuge to collect precipitate (high-entropy hydroxide precursor)
  • Wash with ethanol and water
  • Thermal treatment at 400-600°C in air to convert to HEO
• Characterization: Confirm hollow morphology by TEM/SEM and single-phase structure by XRD.

Mechanism Insights

• Etching: Cu₂O + xS₂O₃²⁻ + H₂O → [Cu₂(S₂O₃)ₓ]²⁻²ˣ + 2OH⁻
• Precipitation: Mˣ⁺ + xOH⁻ → M(OH)ₓ
• Controlled OH⁻ release enables simultaneous co-precipitation of multiple metals

Thermodynamic Pathways Visualization

Thermodynamic Pathways for HEO Design

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for Carbon-Supported HEO Synthesis

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function/Purpose	Protocol Reference
Cation Precursors	Metal chlorides: FeCl₃·6H₂O, CoCl₂·6H₂O, NiCl₂·6H₂O, MnCl₂·4H₂O, CrCl₃·6H₂O	Source of metal cations for HEO formation; chloride salts preferred for lower decomposition temperatures	[52] [53]
Carbon Supports	Graphene oxide (GO), Carbon black (Vulcan XC-72), Reduced graphene oxide (rGO)	High surface area support (up to 2630 m²/g theoretical for graphene); provides conductivity and prevents nanoparticle agglomeration	[52] [51]
Oxygen Potential Control	High-purity Argon (99.999%), Ar/H₂ mixtures (5% H₂)	Controls oxygen chemical potential during synthesis to stabilize desired cation valence states (e.g., Mn²⁺, Fe²⁺)	[1] [27]
Structure-Directing Agents	Sodium thiosulfate (Na₂S₂O₃), Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)	Coordinates with metal ions and controls morphology through etching and templating effects	[53]
Reducing Agents	In situ generated H₂ (from C + H₂O → CO₂ + 2H₂), Carbon support itself	Facilitates reduction of metal cations to desired oxidation states during synthesis	[52]

Performance Optimization Guidelines

Thermodynamic Stability Criteria

Successful HEO design should adhere to these thermodynamic guidelines:

• Entropy Maximization: Select ≥5 principal elements with equimolar ratios to achieve ΔSconfig ≥ 1.61R [50]
• Cation Size Compatibility: Maintain atomic radius difference δ < 6.5% to minimize lattice strain [51]
• Valence Control: Utilize pO₂-T phase diagrams to identify conditions for desired cation oxidation states [1]
• Enthalpy Considerations: Control ΔHmix to avoid phase separation while enabling entropy stabilization [50]

Electrochemical Performance Correlation

Carbon-supported HEOs exhibit enhanced electrochemical performance through:

• Multi-element Synergy: The "cocktail effect" from diverse cation combinations optimizes adsorption energies of reaction intermediates [50] [51]
• Lattice Distortion Benefits: Strain fields from cation size mismatch create favorable active sites for catalytic reactions [50]
• Stability Enhancement: Strong metal-support interaction with carbon matrices prevents degradation during electrochemical cycling [52] [54]

Table 3: Electrochemical Performance Metrics of Carbon-Supported HEO/HEA Systems

Material System	Application	Key Performance Metric	Comparison to Reference	Stability
FeCoNiCuPt HEA-NPs/G [52]	ORR	Mass activity: 1.94 A mgPt⁻¹ @ 0.90 V vs RHE	Superior to commercial Pt/C	Maintained after 10,000 cycles
FeCoNiCuPt HEA-NPs/G [52]	HER	Mass activity: 32.71 A mgPt⁻¹ @ -0.05 V vs RHE	High efficiency for hydrogen production	Excellent cycle stability
PtAuPdFeCoNiCu HEA/C [54]	ORR	Onset potential: 0.877 V vs RHE	Comparable to premium catalysts	+7.4 mV E₁/₂ shift after 20,000 cycles
NiCoFeCdCr-O HEO [53]	Hydrogenation	Rate constant: 1.79 min⁻¹ for p-nitrophenol	High catalytic efficiency	>95% conversion over 10 cycles

Validating HEO Structure and Comparing Functional Performance

Techniques for Confirming Single-Phase Formation and Cation Homogeneity

Within the paradigm of thermodynamics-inspired synthesis of High-Entropy Oxides (HEOs), confirming single-phase formation and cation homogeneity is a critical step that bridges theoretical prediction and experimental realization. The stabilization of single-phase solid solutions relies on a careful balance of configurational entropy, enthalpic contributions, and thermodynamic processing conditions [1]. While entropy stabilization is often explored through cation selection at high temperatures under ambient oxygen partial pressure (pO₂), the oxygen chemical potential serves as a powerful, yet underutilized, thermodynamic axis for controlling phase stability [1] [27]. This document provides detailed application notes and protocols for verifying these essential material characteristics, ensuring that synthesized materials meet the criteria for true high-entropy ceramics.

Computational Prediction and Phase Stability Assessment

Before embarking on resource-intensive synthesis, computational methods can predict the propensity for single-phase formation.

Descriptors for Phase Formation Capability

The phase formation and stabilization in multicomponent ceramics are often controlled by specific thermodynamic and structural descriptors. Key descriptors identified in research include:

• Configurational Entropy of Mixing: A reliable descriptor to predict the phase formation of multi-principal component ceramics, indicating the ability to accommodate configurational randomness while preventing polymorphic transformations [55].
• Average Cation Radius ((\bar{r})) and Deviation ((\sigma_r)): The phase formation capability in β-phase multiple rare-earth disilicates shows a dependency on the average RE³⁺ radius and the deviations of different RE³⁺ combinations [55].
• Enthalpic Stability Map: Utilizing machine learning interatomic potentials (e.g., Crystal Hamiltonian Graph Neural Network - CHGNet) to calculate mixing enthalpy (ΔHmix) and bond length distribution (σbonds) provides a map for enthalpic stability. Compositions with lower ΔHmix and σbonds are more likely to form single phases [1].
• Oxygen Chemical Potential Overlap: A key complementary descriptor for predicting HEO stability and synthesizability. Controlling pO₂ during synthesis can coerce multivalent cations into a uniform divalent state, enabling single-phase formation in rock salt HEOs that would otherwise be inaccessible [1] [27].

First-Principles Calculations

First-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations are a cornerstone for high-throughput screening of potential HEO compositions.

• Protocol: Calculations are performed using packages like the Vienna Ab-Initio Simulation Package (VASP) [56].
• Methodology: The projector-augmented wave (PAW) method along with exchange-correlation functionals like Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) are used for structural optimizations [56]. A kinetic energy cutoff (e.g., 600 eV) and a k-point mesh (e.g., Γ-centered 12 × 12 × 12) are selected for accuracy.
• Output Analysis: The formation energy (ΔHform) is calculated for the high-entropy system. A negative ΔHform suggests a tendency to form a single-phase solid solution. The lattice distortion (δ) can also be calculated; a value below a critical threshold (e.g., δ ≤ 6.6%) is indicative of possible single-phase formation [56].

Table 1: Key Computed Descriptors for Phase Stability Assessment

Descriptor	Calculation Method	Interpretation for Single-Phase Formation
Formation Energy (ΔHform)	First-Principles DFT [56]	A negative value indicates thermodynamic favorability for solid solution formation.
Configurational Entropy (ΔSconf)	ΔSconf = -RΣ(xᵢ ln xᵢ), where R is the gas constant and xᵢ is the mole fraction of component i [55]	Higher values increase the stability of the solid solution phase at elevated temperatures.
Mixing Enthalpy (ΔHmix)	Atomistic calculations using machine learning interatomic potentials (e.g., CHGNet) [1]	A lower value indicates a lower enthalpic barrier to single-phase formation.
Bond Length Distribution (σbonds)	Standard deviation of relaxed first-neighbor cation-anion bond lengths from computational models [1]	A lower value suggests minimal lattice distortion, promoting single-phase stability.

Experimental Protocols for Verification

After synthesis, a multi-technique experimental approach is essential for confirmation.

X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD is the primary technique for identifying crystalline phases and confirming single-phase formation.

• Protocol:
  • Sample Preparation: Grind the sintered pellet/powder into a fine, homogeneous powder using an agate mortar and pestle.
  • Data Collection: Use a diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. Typical parameters include a 2θ range of 10° to 90°, a step size of 0.02°, and a counting time of 1-2 seconds per step.
  • Data Analysis:
    • Phase Identification: Match the acquired diffraction pattern with known crystal structures (e.g., rock salt, fluorite) using ICDD PDF database. The presence of a single set of diffraction peaks corresponding to the desired crystal structure indicates single-phase formation [56] [55].
    • Rietveld Refinement: Perform a Rietveld refinement to determine precise lattice parameters, phase fractions, and atomic displacement parameters. A good fit with a single-phase model and the absence of extraneous peaks confirm phase purity [55].
    • Shift in Peak Positions: Observe a shift in diffraction peaks compared to those of the constituent binary oxides, indicating the formation of a solid solution with a new lattice parameter.

The following workflow outlines the sequential protocol for phase and homogeneity analysis:

Microstructural and Elemental Analysis

These techniques probe the chemical homogeneity and local structure of the material.

• Protocol: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS)

  • Sample Preparation: Sintered pellets are polished to a mirror finish using diamond suspensions (down to 1 µm or less). Carbon coating is applied to ensure electrical conductivity.
  • Imaging: Acquire Backscattered Electron (BSE) images. A uniform contrast in BSE mode suggests a homogeneous distribution of elements with similar atomic numbers.
  • Elemental Mapping: Perform EDS mapping over a large area (e.g., 50 µm x 50 µm) and multiple spots. Use a beam voltage of 15-20 kV. A homogeneous and overlapping distribution of all constituent metal signals confirms cation homogeneity at the microscale [56] [55].

• Protocol: Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) with EDS

  • Sample Preparation: Prepare electron-transparent specimens via focused ion beam (FIB) milling or conventional mechanical polishing and ion milling.
  • Imaging and Diffraction: Acquire Selected Area Electron Diffraction (SAED) patterns from multiple grains. The presence of a single set of diffraction spots confirms single-crystallinity and the absence of secondary phases. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) can reveal the atomic lattice.
  • Nanoscale EDS: Perform EDS line scans and point analysis at the nanoscale. This validates the homogeneous distribution of cations at a resolution beyond the capability of SEM [55].

Analysis of Cation Oxidation State and Local Environment

Understanding the local coordination and oxidation states is crucial, especially for HEOs containing multivalent cations.

• Protocol: X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS)
  • Sample Preparation: Homogenously mix fine powder of the sample with boron nitride to create a dilute, absorption-free pellet.
  • Data Collection: Conduct experiments at a synchrotron facility. Collect data at the absorption K- or L-edges of each constituent cation.
  • Data Analysis:
    • XANES (X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure): Analyze the position and shape of the absorption edge. This provides quantitative information on the average oxidation state of each element. For example, in rock salt HEOs, it can confirm the coercion of Mn and Fe into a predominant divalent state [1] [27].
    • EXAFS (Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure): Fit the oscillatory pattern to determine the local coordination environment, including bond lengths and coordination numbers, providing insight into lattice distortion [27].

Table 2: Experimental Techniques for Confirming Single-Phase Formation and Homogeneity

Technique	Key Information Obtained	Experimental Protocol Highlights
X-ray Diffraction (XRD)	Crystal structure, phase purity, lattice parameter [56] [55]	Powder method; Rietveld refinement; search for secondary phase peaks.
SEM with EDS	Microstructure, elemental distribution & homogeneity at micro-scale [56] [55]	Polished & carbon-coated sample; BSE imaging; large-area elemental mapping.
TEM with SAED/EDS	Nanoscale phase identification, crystal structure, local composition [55]	FIB-prepared thin specimen; diffraction patterns; nanoscale EDS mapping.
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS)	Cation oxidation state, local coordination environment [1] [27]	Dilute pellet with BN; synchrotron measurement; XANES & EXAFS analysis.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

A list of key materials, equipment, and software essential for conducting these analyses is provided below.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Equipment for HEO Characterization

Item	Function/Application	Specification Notes
High-Purity Metal Oxide Powders	Precursors for high-entropy oxide synthesis.	Purity ≥ 99.9%; sub-micron particle size to enhance reactivity and mixing.
Planetary Ball Mill	Homogeneous mixing of precursor powders.	Agate or zirconia jars and balls to prevent contamination.
Hot-Press/SPS Furnace	High-temperature sintering of powder mixtures.	Capable of reaching >1600°C under controlled atmosphere (e.g., Ar, vacuum).
XRD System	Phase identification and structural analysis.	Bragg-Brentano geometry; Cu Kα source; high-resolution detector.
Scanning Electron Microscope	Microstructural and compositional analysis.	Equipped with a field emission gun (FEG) and EDS detector.
Transmission Electron Microscope	Nanoscale structural and chemical analysis.	Equipped with EDS and a high-resolution imaging system.
Synchrotron Beamline Access	XAS measurements for oxidation state and local structure.	Beamline capable of measuring relevant absorption edges (e.g., Fe K-edge, Mn K-edge).
DFT Simulation Software (VASP)	First-principles prediction of phase stability and properties.	Requires high-performance computing (HPC) resources.
Rietveld Refinement Software	Quantitative analysis of XRD patterns.	E.g., GSAS, FullProf.

Probing Local Cation Environments and Oxidation States with X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) has emerged as a cornerstone technique in materials science for probing the local chemical environment and electronic structure of elements. Within the context of thermodynamics-inspired synthesis of high-entropy oxides (HEOs), XAS provides indispensable insights that guide the rational design of these complex materials. The synthesis of HEOs transcends traditional temperature-centric approaches, entering a multidimensional thermodynamic landscape where oxygen chemical potential plays a decisive role in stabilizing multivalent cations within a single-phase structure [1] [5]. As researchers strategically manipulate synthesis conditions to coerce multivalent cations into preferred oxidation states, XAS serves as a critical validation tool, offering element-specific information that confirms whether thermodynamic design principles have been successfully translated into material reality.

This Application Note details the methodologies and protocols for employing XAS to characterize local cation environments and oxidation states, with specific application to HEO research. We provide comprehensive experimental frameworks—from sample preparation to data analysis—enabling researchers to extract maximum information from synchrotron-based XAS investigations, thereby accelerating the development of novel HEO compositions with tailored functional properties.

Theoretical Background of XAS

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy encompasses two primary analytical regions: X-ray Absorption Near-Edge Structure (XANES) and Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS). The technique operates on the principle that when X-rays with energy sufficient to eject a core electron (the absorption edge) strike a material, the absorption coefficient reveals fine structure details about the local environment of the absorbing atom [57].

• XANES: This region spans the energy range from approximately 30 eV below the absorption edge to 50 eV above it. The position and shape of the absorption edge are exquisitely sensitive to the formal oxidation state and site symmetry of the absorbing atom. A shift of the edge to higher energies indicates an increase in the oxidation state, as more energy is required to eject a core electron from a more positively charged ion. Furthermore, pre-edge features can provide information about coordination geometry and orbital mixing, such as the presence of centrosymmetric vs. non-centrosymmetric environments [58] [57].

• EXAFS: Extending from about 50 eV to 1000 eV beyond the absorption edge, the EXAFS region contains oscillations resulting from the interference between the outgoing photoelectron wave and the waves backscattered from neighboring atoms. Analysis of these oscillations yields quantitative information about the coordination numbers, bond lengths, and structural disorder (Debye-Waller factor) around the absorbing atom. This makes EXAFS a powerful tool for characterizing the local lattice distortion inherent in HEOs due to the random distribution of cations with different ionic radii [57].

For HEOs, which are defined by configurational entropy and the presence of multiple cations on a single sublattice, XAS is uniquely powerful. It can detect the average local environment of each constituent element independently, even when those elements are present in a highly disordered matrix [20]. This capability is crucial for verifying hypotheses about cation oxidation states and local structure developed through thermodynamic modeling, such as the use of oxygen chemical potential overlap to predict HEO stability [1].

Experimental Protocols

Sample Preparation

Objective: To prepare homogeneous, representative samples for XAS analysis that maintain the structural and chemical integrity of the synthesized HEOs.

Materials:

• High-purity HEO powder (e.g., rock salt (Mg₀.₂Co₀.₂Ni₀.₂Mn₀.₂Fe₀.₂)O) [1]
• High-purity cellulose or boron nitride (for dilution)
• Polyethylene capsules or aluminum sample holders
• Tape suitable for X-ray transparency (e.g., Kapton)

Procedure:

• Grinding: Gently grind the HEO powder using an agate mortar and pestle to ensure a fine, homogeneous particle size and minimize absorption artifacts.
• Homogenization: For transmission mode measurements, uniformly mix the ground HEO powder with an inert, X-ray transparent diluent (e.g., cellulose or boron nitride) to achieve an optimal absorption edge step (Δμd ≈ 1.0). A typical mass ratio is 1:10 to 1:20 (sample:diluent).
• Pelletization: Press the homogeneous mixture into a pellet (typical diameter: 7-13 mm) using a hydraulic press at a pressure of 1-5 tons for 1-2 minutes [59] [58].
• Mounting: For solid pellets, secure them in a sample holder compatible with the beamline's experimental station. For powder samples or thin films, mount them on X-ray transparent tape (e.g., Kapton). Ensure the sample is securely fixed and properly aligned in the X-ray path.
• Storage (if applicable): For air-sensitive materials (e.g., some reduced HEOs or battery electrodes), prepare and seal samples in an inert-atmosphere glovebox and use an airtight sample holder to prevent oxidation during transfer and measurement [57].

Data Collection at Synchrotron Beamline

Objective: To collect high signal-to-noise XAS data for all cation elements of interest within the HEO.

Beamline Configuration:

• Source: A synchrotron bending magnet or insertion device providing a high-flux, monochromatic X-ray beam is required [59].
• Monochromator: A double-crystal monochromator (e.g., Si(111) for elements with K-edges below ~5 keV, Ge(220) for higher energies) is used to scan the X-ray energy [59].
• Detection Modes:
  • Transmission Mode: Ideal for concentrated, homogeneous samples. Uses ionization chambers to measure the intensity of the beam before (I₀) and after (I) passing through the sample.
  • Fluorescence Mode: Essential for dilute elements (e.g., dopants in HEOs) or thin films. Uses a detector (e.g., silicon drift detector) placed at 90° to the incident beam to collect the fluorescent X-rays emitted by the sample [59] [58].

Calibration:

• Simultaneously measure the absorption spectrum of a reference foil (e.g., Fe, Zn) placed between second and third ionization chambers. Assign the first inflection point of the reference foil's absorption edge to its known standard energy (e.g., 7112 eV for Fe foil) for accurate energy calibration of the entire dataset [59].

Data Collection Parameters:

• Energy Range: Collect data from ~200 eV below to ~1000 eV above the absorption edge of the element of interest to capture both the XANES and EXAFS regions.
• Step Size: Use a fine energy step (0.2-0.3 eV) in the XANES region and a coarser step (0.5-2 eV, often in k-space) in the EXAFS region.
• Measurement Time: Adjust integration times to ensure a high signal-to-noise ratio, particularly for the weak oscillations in the EXAFS region.

Table 1: Example XAS Data Collection Parameters for Common HEO Cations

Element	Absorption Edge	Recommended Mode	Monochromator Crystal	Reference Foil for Calibration
Fe	K-edge (7112 eV)	Transmission / Fluorescence	Si(111)	Fe foil
Mn	K-edge (6539 eV)	Transmission / Fluorescence	Si(111)	Mn foil
Zn	K-edge (9659 eV)	Transmission / Fluorescence	Si(311) or Ge(220)	Zn foil
O	K-edge (543 eV)	Fluorescence (sXAS)	Si(111) or varied-line spacing grating	—

Data Processing and Analysis

Objective: To extract quantitative structural and electronic information from raw XAS data.

Software:

• Athena (part of the Demeter software package) [59]
• Other specialized codes (e.g., FEFF, LARCH).

Procedures:

• Energy Alignment: Align all spectra to the calibrated energy scale of the reference foil.
• Background Subtraction: Pre-edge background subtraction using a linear or polynomial function to isolate the absorption of the target edge.
• Normalization: Post-edge normalization to a unit step height to enable comparison between different samples.
• XANES Analysis:
  • Oxidation State Determination: Compare the energy of the absorption edge (e.g., the first inflection point or the half-height) of the sample with those of reference compounds with known oxidation states. A higher edge energy indicates a higher oxidation state [1] [57].
  • Linear Combination Analysis (LCA): Fit the sample's XANES spectrum using a linear combination of spectra from standard compounds to quantify the proportion of different phases or oxidation states present. For example, LCA was used to speciate sulfur in aerosol particles into sulfates, bisulfates, and organic sulfur [59].
• EXAFS Analysis:
  • Background Removal: Isolate the EXAFS oscillations (χ(k)) by subtracting a spline function that approximates the atomic background.
  • Fourier Transform: Convert the k-space spectrum χ(k) to R-space to produce a pseudo-radial distribution function, which shows peaks corresponding to coordination shells.
  • Curve Fitting: Fit the EXAFS data in R-space or k-space using theoretical scattering paths generated by ab initio codes like FEFF. The fitting parameters include coordination number (N), bond distance (R), and Debye-Waller factor (σ²), which provides the local structural metrics around the absorbing atom [58] [60].

Application in High-Entropy Oxide Research

The application of XAS has been pivotal in validating thermodynamic design principles for HEOs. A landmark study demonstrated the use of controlled oxygen chemical potential during synthesis to coerce multivalent cations like Mn and Fe into a divalent state within rock salt HEOs [1] [5]. X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) analysis was critical for confirming the predominantly divalent state of Mn and Fe in the synthesized single-phase HEOs, despite their inherent multivalent tendencies [1]. This direct experimental evidence confirmed that the thermodynamic strategy of operating in low pO₂ regions (e.g., Region 2 and 3 in the T-pO₂ phase diagram) successfully suppressed higher oxidation states, enabling the incorporation of these elements into the rock salt structure.

Furthermore, EXAFS provides a means to quantify the local lattice distortion in HEOs, a key characteristic arising from the mix of cations with different ionic radii. Analysis of bond length distributions from EXAFS can be correlated with the "σbonds" parameter used in enthalpic stability maps to predict HEO synthesizability [1]. In functional HEOs, such as those used in battery applications, in situ or operando XAS can track the evolution of oxidation states and local structures during electrochemical cycling, providing mechanistic insights into charge compensation and degradation pathways [57].

Table 2: Key Information Obtainable from XAS for HEO Characterization

Information Goal	Primary XAS Region	Analysis Method	Application Example in HEOs
Average Oxidation State	XANES	Edge position comparison, LCA	Confirming Mn²⁺/Fe²⁺ in rock salt HEOs synthesized under low pO₂ [1]
Local Coordination Geometry	XANES	Pre-edge feature analysis	Identifying octahedral coordination of Pb²⁺ in perovskites [58]
Local Bond Lengths	EXAFS	Fourier Transform, Fitting	Measuring Me-O bond distance distribution for lattice distortion analysis [1] [20]
Coordination Numbers	EXAFS	Fourier Transform, Fitting	Quantifying changes in oxygen coordination during redox processes [57]
Cation Site Occupancy	EXAFS	Fitting with multiple scattering paths	Determining if a dopant (e.g., Pt) substitutes for the A-site or B-site in a perovskite [58]

Advanced Analysis and Integration

Beyond standard analysis, advanced XAS applications are pushing the boundaries of HEO characterization.

• XANES Simulation: Theoretical spectra can be calculated using codes like FEFF based on proposed structural models. By comparing experimental and simulated XANES, researchers can validate complex local structural hypotheses. This approach was used to confirm that Pt²⁺ dopants replace Pb²⁺ sites in the α-FAPbI₃ perovskite structure, forming Pt-I octahedra [58].
• Operando XAS: Characterizing materials under real operating conditions (e.g., during electrochemical cycling in a battery or under catalytic reaction conditions) is invaluable. Operando XAS can capture transient states and reaction intermediates, providing a dynamic view of structure-property relationships [57].
• Machine Learning Integration: The analysis of large XAS datasets is increasingly being augmented by machine learning (ML) algorithms. ML can assist in spectral analysis, pattern recognition, and even predicting spectral features from structural descriptors, accelerating the discovery and optimization of new HEOs [60].
• Multi-Technique Approach: Combining XAS with complementary techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), electron microscopy (SEM/TEM), and computational thermodynamics (CALPHAD) provides a multi-scale understanding, linking local atomic environment to long-range structure and macroscopic properties [1] [57] [20].

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for XAS Studies of HEOs

Item	Function / Purpose	Examples / Specifications
Inert Diluents	To homogenously dilute concentrated samples to optimal absorption thickness for transmission mode measurements.	Cellulose, Boron Nitride (BN)
Reference Foils	For precise energy calibration of the X-ray beam during data collection.	Metal foils of Fe, Zn, Cu, etc. (≥ 99.9% purity)
Standard Compounds	For energy calibration and as references for Linear Combination Analysis (LCA) in XANES.	ZnSO₄·7H₂O (for S K-edge), KCl (for Cl & K K-edges), Fe₂O₃, FeO, FeSO₄, MnO, MnO₂, etc. [59]
X-ray Transparent Tape	To mount powder samples or thin films in the X-ray beam path.	Kapton tape (polyimide)
Pellet Die Set	To press powdered samples into uniform pellets for robust and reproducible mounting.	Stainless steel die set; diameters 7 mm or 13 mm
Airtight Sample Holders	To prevent oxidation or reaction of air-sensitive samples (e.g., some HEOs, battery materials) with atmosphere.	Commercially available or custom-made holders with X-ray transparent windows (e.g., Kapton).

How Synthesis Choice Influences Catalytic and Electrochemical Properties

The synthesis of high-entropy oxides (HEOs) has transcended traditional, temperature-centric approaches, evolving into a discipline where precise control over thermodynamic parameters dictates the final material's properties. HEOs, characterized as solid-solution phases containing five or more principal metal cations in near-equimolar proportions, derive stability from high configurational entropy [61] [53]. This foundational principle allows for the combination of disparate elements into a single-phase structure, unlocking unique functional properties for catalytic and electrochemical applications such as electrocatalysis (HER, OER, ORR, CO2RR), metal-ion batteries, and supercapacitors [61]. The core synthesis challenge lies in navigating the multidimensional thermodynamic landscape to kinetically trap a homogeneous, single-phase material from a mixture of precursors that may have divergent chemical behaviors. Contemporary research, particularly within the framework of thermodynamics-inspired synthesis, has established that the oxygen chemical potential (pO2) during processing is as critical a variable as temperature itself [1] [62] [5]. By manipulating this parameter, researchers can coercively stabilize desired oxidation states in multivalent cations—such as maintaining Mn and Fe in a 2+ state for rock salt structures—there dramatically expanding the compositional space of synthesizable HEOs and directly influencing their catalytic activity and electrochemical storage capabilities [1].

Synthesis Methodologies and Their Governing Parameters

The selection of a synthesis method predefines the available parameter space for controlling material properties. The following sections detail key methodologies, with their critical control parameters summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Key Synthesis Methods for High-Entropy Oxides and Their Control Parameters

Synthesis Method	Critical Control Parameters	Target Phase/Structure	Key Influences on Final Properties
Solid-State Reaction	Temperature (>1000°C), Annealing Time, Atmosphere (pO2) [61]	Rock Salt, Spinel [61]	Crystallinity, Phase Purity, Particle Size & Aggregation [61]
Solution Combustion Synthesis	Fuel Type & Ratio, Sintering Temperature/Time, Post-treatment [16]	Fluorite, Spinel [16]	Nanoscale Porosity, Specific Surface Area, Oxygen Vacancy Concentration [16]
Coordinating Etching Route	Template Morphology, Etchant Concentration, Precipitation Kinetics [53]	Hollow Nanostructures (Spinel) [53]	3D Hollow Architecture, Mass Transport Efficiency, Density of Exposed Active Sites [53]

Thermodynamics-Controlled Solid-State Synthesis

This traditional route involves high-temperature sintering of precursor oxide mixtures. The groundbreaking development is the precise manipulation of the oxygen partial pressure (pO2) in the furnace atmosphere. For instance, to incorporate Mn and Fe into rock salt HEOs, the pO2 must be controlled to access thermodynamic regions (e.g., ~10⁻¹⁰ to 10⁻¹⁵ bar) where these elements are stable in the 2+ oxidation state, preventing their tendency to form higher oxides [1] [62]. This is described by the Gibbs free energy equation, G = H - TΔS, where the entropy term (-TΔS) and the enthalpy of mixing are balanced under specific pO2 to stabilize the single-phase solid solution [61] [1]. Machine learning interatomic potentials are now used to rapidly screen thousands of compositions for favorable mixing enthalpy (ΔHₘᵢₓ) and bond length distribution (σᵦₒₙdₛ), predicting synthesizability before experimental attempts [1] [62].

Low-Temperature and Morphology-Controlled Routes

Solution Combustion Synthesis offers a lower-energy pathway, utilizing exothermic reactions between metal nitrates (oxidizers) and fuels (e.g., glycine). The fuel-to-oxidizer ratio is a critical parameter governing the exothermicity of the reaction, which in turn controls the phase purity, specific surface area, and nanoscale porosity of the resulting HEOs [16]. This method has successfully produced complex fluorite HEOs (e.g., (Zr₀.₂Ti₀.₂Ce₀.₂Mn₀.₂Mg₀.₂)O₂₋δ) with multivalent cations and abundant oxygen vacancies, which are crucial for redox-based catalysis [16].

Template-Assisted Coordinating Etching is a novel strategy for creating precise hollow morphologies. This method involves using a template (e.g., Cu₂O nanocubes) that is selectively etched by a coordinating agent (e.g., S₂O₃²⁻). The etching process simultaneously releases hydroxide ions (OH⁻), which trigger the co-precipitation of a high-entropy hydroxide shell onto the template. Subsequent thermal treatment converts this shell into a single-phase HEO (e.g., spinel) while preserving the hollow nanocube morphology [53]. This allows for the creation of high-surface-area architectures with enhanced mass transport properties, directly beneficial for catalytic applications.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Thermodynamics-Guided Synthesis of a Rock Salt HEO

This protocol outlines the synthesis of a rock salt (Mg₀.₂Co₀.₂Ni₀.₂Mn₀.₂Fe₀.₂)O HEO under controlled oxygen partial pressure, based on the methodology detailed in [1] [5].

Research Reagent Solutions & Materials

Item	Function / Explanation
Metal Oxide Precursors	High-purity (>99%) MgO, CoO, NiO, MnO₂, Fe₂O₃. Source of constituent metal cations.
Planetary Ball Mill	For thorough homogenization of precursor powders to achieve atomic-level mixing.
Tube Furnace with Gas Flow System	Provides high-temperature environment with precise atmosphere control.
Argon Gas (Ar) Supply	Creates an inert, low-pO₂ atmosphere inside the tube furnace.
X-ray Diffraction (XRD)	For phase identification and confirmation of single-phase rock salt structure.
X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS)	For determining the oxidation states of cations, confirming Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺ stabilization.

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Precursor Preparation: Weigh metal oxide powders in an equimolar cation ratio (e.g., 0.2 moles of each cation). Ensure a total powder mass suitable for your equipment.
• Mechanical Mixing: Transfer the powder mixture to a planetary ball mill jar. Use appropriate grinding media (e.g., zirconia balls) and add a suitable solvent (e.g., ethanol) for wet milling to prevent agglomeration. Mill for several hours (e.g., 2-6 h) to ensure homogeneous mixing.
• Pelletization: After milling and drying, uniaxially press the mixed powder into dense pellets (e.g., 10-15 mm diameter) under a suitable pressure (e.g., 50-100 MPa) to improve inter-particle contact and reaction kinetics.
• High-Temperature Synthesis under Controlled Atmosphere: a. Place the pellets in an alumina boat and load them into a tube furnace. b. Seal the furnace and purge with high-purity argon gas for a sufficient time (e.g., 30-60 minutes) to eliminate residual oxygen. c. Ramp the temperature to the target synthesis range (e.g., 900-1000°C) under a continuous flow of argon. The flowing argon maintains a low pO₂ (~10⁻¹⁰ to 10⁻¹⁵ bar), which is critical for stabilizing Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺. d. Hold the temperature for a defined period (e.g., 5-10 hours) to allow for single-phase formation and homogenization via solid-state diffusion. e. Cool the samples to room temperature under the same argon flow to preserve the metastable high-entropy phase.
• Characterization: Characterize the final product using XRD to confirm the formation of a single-phase rock salt structure without secondary phases. Use XAFS to verify that Mn and Fe are predominantly in the 2+ oxidation state.

Protocol: Synthesis of HEO Hollow Nanocubes via Coordinating Etching

This protocol describes the synthesis of hollow nanocubes of a spinel HEO (e.g., NiCoFeCdCr-O), as presented in [53].

Research Reagent Solutions & Materials

Item	Function / Explanation
Cu₂O Nanocube Template	Sacrificial template that defines the final hollow cubic morphology.
Soft Base Etchant (Na₂S₂O₃)	Coordinates with Cu⁺ (soft acid) of the template, dissolving it and releasing OH⁻ ions.
Metal Salt Precursors	e.g., Ni(NO₃)₂, Co(NO₃)₂, Fe(NO₃)₃, Cd(NO₃)₂, Cr(NO₃)₃. Source of HEO cations.
Centrifuge	For collecting and washing the synthesized core-shell and hollow nanostructures.
Muffle Furnace	For low-temperature thermal treatment to convert hydroxide precursor to oxide.

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Synthesize Cu₂O Nanocubes: Prepare monodisperse Cu₂O nanocubes according to established methods prior to the HEO synthesis.
• Etching and Co-precipitation: a. Disperse the synthesized Cu₂O nanocubes in deionized water. b. In a separate container, dissolve the metal salt precursors (for Ni, Co, Fe, Cd, Cr) in deionized water. c. Combine the metal salt solution with the Cu₂O nanocube dispersion under gentle stirring. d. Slowly add an aqueous solution of sodium thiosulfate (Na₂S₂O₃) to the mixture. The S₂O₃²⁻ ions will etch the Cu₂O, releasing Cu⁺ as a soluble complex [Cu₂(S₂O₃)ₓ]²⁻²ˣ and generating OH⁻ ions locally at the template surface (Eq. 1). e. The released OH⁻ ions immediately cause the precipitation of a high-entropy hydroxide (HE-OH) shell onto the etching template (Eq. 2). The reaction is: Cu₂O + xS₂O₃²⁻ + H₂O → [Cu₂(S₂O₃)ₓ]²⁻²ˣ + 2OH⁻ (Etching) Mˣ⁺ + xOH⁻ → M(OH)ₓ (Co-precipitation)
• Collection and Washing: After the reaction completes (evidenced by a color change and consumption of Cu₂O), collect the solid product (HE-OH coated on Cu₂O or hollowed structures) by centrifugation. Wash thoroughly with water and ethanol to remove by-products and unreacted precursors.
• Thermal Treatment: Dry the collected powder and anneal it in a muffle furnace at a moderate temperature (e.g., 400-600°C) in air. This step decomposes the hydroxide shell into the final crystalline HEO phase while removing any residual template and organics, resulting in HEO hollow nanocubes.
• Characterization: Use SEM/TEM to confirm the hollow cubic morphology and elemental mapping (EDS) to verify homogeneous cation distribution.

Connecting Synthesis Parameters to Functional Properties

The chosen synthesis pathway and its parameters directly dictate the physicochemical properties of the HEO, which in turn govern its performance in catalysis and electrochemistry. This cause-and-effect relationship is visualized in the following workflow.

Synthesis-to-Property Workflow

• Oxygen Potential (pO₂) Control → Cation Valence & Crystal Structure: As shown in the workflow, controlling pO₂ is a primary parameter. Synthesizing under low pO₂ coerces multivalent cations like Mn and Fe into a 2+ state, enabling their incorporation into a stable rock salt structure that would otherwise be inaccessible [1] [62]. This specific cationic environment can tailor electronic conductivity and the binding energy of reaction intermediates in electrocatalysis.
• Morphology Control → Surface Area & Mass Transport: The coordinating etching method directly influences the "Surface Area & Porosity" property. Creating hollow nanocube architectures maximizes the density of exposed active sites and provides short, efficient pathways for ion/electron transport and reactant diffusion, directly enhancing catalytic reaction rates and battery electrode kinetics [53].
• Synthesis Temperature & Fuel Chemistry → Oxygen Vacancies: Low-temperature routes like solution combustion can preserve high concentrations of oxygen vacancies, especially when multivalent cations like Ce³⁺/⁴⁺ and Mn²⁺/³⁺/⁴⁺ are present [16]. These vacancies, as shown in the workflow, are a critical property that enhances catalytic activity by modifying surface electronic structure and facilitating the adsorption and activation of molecules in reactions like OER and CO2RR.

Application Performance and Comparative Analysis

The strategic selection of a synthesis method, by defining the resultant material properties, leads to dramatically different performance outcomes in applications. Table 2 provides a comparative summary of the performance of HEOs synthesized via different routes.

Table 2: Influence of Synthesis Method on HEO Application Performance

Synthesis Method	HEO Composition / Morphology	Application & Test Conditions	Key Performance Metric & Result	Property-Performance Link
Solid-State (Low-pO₂)	(MgCoNiMnFe)O / Rock Salt, Bulk [1]	(Fundamental stabilization demonstrated)	Successful single-phase formation with Mn²⁺/Fe²⁺ [1]	Controlled cation valence enables access to new, stable compositions for fundamental study.
Coordinating Etching	NiCoFeCdCr-O / Hollow Nanocubes [53]	Catalytic Hydrogenation of p-Nitrophenol	Rate constant (k) = 1.79 min⁻¹; Stability > 95% over 10 cycles [53]	Hollow morphology provides high surface area and efficient mass transport, boosting activity and stability.
Solution Combustion	(Zr₀.₂Ti₀.₂Ce₀.₂Mn₀.₂Mg₀.₂)O₂₋δ / Porous Nano-Sponge [16]	(Structural characterization for catalysis)	Confirmed abundant oxygen vacancies & multivalent cations [16]	High oxygen vacancy concentration and redox-active cations are predicted to enhance catalytic activity.
General HEOs	Various HEOs (Spinel, Rock Salt) [61]	Lithium-Ion Batteries (Anodes)	Reversible capacity up to 976 mAh g⁻¹ after 300 cycles [61]	Multivalent nature and structural stability enable high lithium storage capacity and long-term cyclability.

The data in Table 2 underscores that there is no single "best" synthesis method. The optimal choice is dictated by the target application. The high capacity and cycling stability in batteries are afforded by the multivalent nature and structural robustness of HEOs, achievable via solid-state and other high-temperature routes [61]. In contrast, supreme catalytic performance, as seen with the hollow nanocubes, is a direct consequence of morphology engineering through innovative low-temperature solution-based syntheses [53].

High-entropy oxides (HEOs), defined by their single-phase crystal structure incorporating five or more principal cations in near-equimolar proportions, represent a paradigm shift in functional materials design [63]. The core premise of HEOs is entropy stabilization, where the high configurational entropy (ΔS~config~ ≥ 1.5R, where R is the gas constant) dominates the Gibbs free energy (ΔG = ΔH – TΔS), thereby stabilizing a single-phase solid solution that would otherwise be unstable based on enthalpy considerations alone [64] [9]. This foundational thermodynamic principle, expressed in the seminal work on thermodynamics-inspired synthesis, enables access to a vast compositional space and unique properties, including severe lattice distortion, sluggish diffusion, and cocktail effects [1] [65]. This Application Note provides a structured benchmarking analysis and detailed experimental protocols for leveraging HEOs in catalytic and energy storage applications, framed within the advanced synthesis framework of controlling oxygen chemical potential.

Performance Benchmarking in Catalysis

HEOs have demonstrated exceptional promise in thermal, electro-, and photocatalysis due to their highly tunable surface composition, rich oxygen vacancies, and exceptional thermal stability [66] [67]. Their multi-cationic nature provides a complex landscape for active sites, which can be optimized for specific reactions.

Table 1: Benchmarking HEO Performance in Catalytic Applications

Application	HEO Composition & Structure	Key Performance Metric(s)	Comparative Baseline	Reference
Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER)	(Co,Cu,Mg,Ni,Zn)O Rock salt	Overpotential, Tafel slope	Outperforms conventional IrO~2~ and binary oxide benchmarks	[63] [67]
Thermocatalytic Oxidation	Rock salt and Spinel HEOs	Conversion efficiency, operational stability	Superior activity and stability compared to medium- or low-entropy oxides	[66] [65]
Support for Single-Atom Catalysts (SACs)	Various HEO structures	Metal atom dispersion, sintering resistance	Exceptional stabilization of single metal atoms under high-temperature conditions	[68]

The performance of HEOs in catalysis is intrinsically linked to their synthesis. The thermodynamics-inspired approach emphasizes that stabilizing certain cations (e.g., Mn and Fe in a divalent state) requires precise control over the oxygen chemical potential (pO~2~) during processing, rather than relying solely on high temperatures [1] [27]. This allows for the incorporation of a broader range of elements into a single-phase structure, directly influencing the catalytic "cocktail effect" by expanding the compositional palette.

Experimental Protocol: Synthesis of Rock Salt HEOs via Thermodynamics-Inspired Route

This protocol details the synthesis of rock salt HEOs containing multivalent cations (e.g., Mn, Fe) through control of oxygen partial pressure, as described in Nature Communications [1].

1. Reagent Preparation:

• Precursor Oxides: High-purity (≥99.9%) binary oxide powders (e.g., MgO, NiO, CoO, MnO~2~, Fe~2~O~3~, ZnO).
• Grinding Media: Use zirconia or agate balls if using mechanochemical milling.
• Atmosphere Control: Argon (Ar) gas with a regulated flow for maintaining a low-oxygen environment.

2. Methodology: 1. Stoichiometric Weighing: Calculate and weigh the binary oxide precursors to achieve the desired equimolar cation ratio (e.g., (Mg,Co,Ni,Mn,Fe)O). 2. Mixing: Mix the powders thoroughly using a ball mill for 12-24 hours to ensure initial homogeneity. 3. Pelletization: Compress the mixed powder into dense pellets using a uniaxial press at ~5 tons to maximize inter-particle contact. 4. High-Temperature Synthesis under Controlled Atmosphere: * Place the pellets in an alumina boat inside a tube furnace. * Purge the furnace tube with a continuous flow of Ar gas for at least 30 minutes to remove air. * Heat the sample to a high temperature (e.g., 900-1000 °C) with a heating rate of 5 °C/min, maintaining the Ar flow throughout the heating, dwell, and cooling phases. * Hold at the target temperature for 10-12 hours to facilitate cation interdiffusion and single-phase formation. * Cool the sample to room temperature naturally inside the furnace under continuous Ar flow.

3. Validation & Characterization: * Phase Purity: Confirm single-phase rock salt formation using X-ray Diffraction (XRD). The pattern should show a single set of peaks corresponding to the rock salt structure (Fm(\bar{3})m). * Cation Homogeneity: Analyze elemental distribution using Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) mapping. * Oxidation State: Verify the dominant presence of divalent Mn and Fe cations through X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS) analysis.

Performance Benchmarking in Energy Storage

In electrochemical energy storage, HEOs excel as electrode materials due to their superior structural stability, high ionic conductivity, and entropy-driven resilience against phase degradation during cycling [69] [63] [64].

Table 2: Benchmarking HEO Performance in Energy Storage Applications

Application	HEO Composition & Structure	Key Performance Metric(s)	Comparative Baseline	Reference
Li-Ion Battery Anode	(Co,Cu,Mg,Ni,Zn)O Rock salt	Specific Capacity: ~770 mAh g⁻¹ after 100 cycles; Capacity Retention: Stable over 500 cycles	Superior cycling stability compared to conventional conversion anodes (e.g., CoO, NiO)	[69]
Li-Ion Battery Anode	(Cr,Mn,Fe,Co,Ni)~3~O~4~ Spinel	High specific capacity, excellent rate capability	Outperforms medium-entropy and binary spinel analogues	[64]
Solid-State Electrolyte	(Mg,Co,Ni,Cu,Zn)O doped with Li	Li-ion Conductivity: >10⁻³ S cm⁻¹ at room temperature	Exceeds conductivity of many conventional ceramic Li-ion conductors	[69] [63]

The remarkable cycling stability of HEOs, as benchmarked in Nature Communications [69], is a direct consequence of entropy stabilization. The high-configurational entropy presents a significant kinetic barrier to phase separation during lithiation/delithiation, enabling the material to act as a resilient "matrix" that buffers volume changes and maintains structural integrity over hundreds of cycles.

Experimental Protocol: Electrochemical Testing of HEO Anodes for Li-Ion Batteries

This protocol outlines the procedure for fabricating and testing HEO-based anodes in half-cell configurations (vs. Li/Li⁺) to evaluate their lithium storage performance [69].

1. Electrode Slurry Preparation: * Active Material: Synthesized HEO powder (e.g., (Co~0.2~Cu~0.2~Mg~0.2~Ni~0.2~Zn~0.2~)O). * Conductive Additive: Carbon black (e.g., Super P). * Binder: Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) or Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC). * Solvent: N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) for PVDF or Deionized Water for CMC. * Standard Composition: Mix components in the weight ratio of 63:27:10 (HEO : Carbon Black : Binder) to form a homogeneous slurry.

2. Electrode Fabrication & Cell Assembly: 1. Coating: Uniformly coat the slurry onto a copper foil current collector using a doctor blade. 2. Drying: Dry the coated electrode at ~80-100 °C under vacuum for 12 hours to remove the solvent completely. 3. Cell Assembly: In an Ar-filled glovebox (H~2~O, O~2~ < 0.1 ppm), assemble a CR2032-type coin cell with: * The HEO electrode as the working electrode. * Lithium metal foil as the counter/reference electrode. * A porous polymer separator (e.g., Celgard). * A liquid electrolyte (e.g., 1 M LiPF~6~ in a 1:1 v/v mixture of ethylene carbonate and diethyl carbonate).

3. Electrochemical Measurement: * Cycling Protocol: Perform galvanostatic charge-discharge cycling between 0.01 V and 3.0 V (vs. Li/Li⁺) at various specific currents (e.g., 50 mA g⁻¹ for formation cycles, 200-500 mA g⁻¹ for long-term cycling). * Rate Capability Test: Cycle the cell at progressively increasing current densities (e.g., from 0.1 to 3 A g⁻¹) and then return to a low current to assess capacity recovery.

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for HEO Research

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Key Considerations
High-Purity Binary Oxide Precursors	Starting materials for solid-state synthesis.	Purity (≥99.9%) is critical to avoid impurity phases. Particle size affects reaction kinetics.
Argon Gas Supply	Creates an inert, low-oxygen partial pressure (pO~2~) atmosphere during synthesis.	Essential for thermodynamics-inspired synthesis to control cation oxidation states (e.g., stabilizing Mn²⁺, Fe²⁺) [1].
Carbon Black (e.g., Super P)	Conductive additive in electrode slurries for electrochemical testing.	Ensves electronic percolation throughout the electrode, critical for accurate performance evaluation.
Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF)	Binder for electrode fabrication in non-aqueous systems.	Provides mechanical integrity to the electrode coating; requires NMP as solvent.
N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP)	Solvent for PVDF binder in electrode slurry preparation.	Ensves homogeneous slurry and good coating quality.
Lithium Hexafluorophosphate (LiPF~6~) in Carbonate Solvents	Standard liquid electrolyte for Li-ion battery testing.	Electrolyte composition (salts, solvents) must be compatible with the HEO material and operational voltage window.

The synthesis and development of high-entropy oxides (HEOs) represent a paradigm shift in ceramic materials design, where configurational disorder is engineered to unlock novel functionality not accessible in conventional simple oxides [70]. These compositionally complex ceramics, typically comprising five or more cations in near-equimolar proportions, often retain a single crystalline phase despite their significant chemical complexity [71]. A critical challenge in this field lies in establishing a robust validation framework that bridges the traditional analysis of average crystallographic structure with the emerging understanding of local structural disorder, which profoundly governs functional properties from ionic transport to catalytic activity [70]. This application note outlines standardized protocols and methodologies for characterizing this multi-scale structure-property relationship, framed within the context of thermodynamics-inspired synthesis approaches that enable access to previously inaccessible HEO compositions [1].

The thermodynamic stabilization of HEOs transcends conventional temperature-centric approaches, spanning a multidimensional landscape where oxygen chemical potential plays a decisive role in phase formation and cation valence state control [1]. While the traditional Gibbs free energy relationship, ΔG = ΔH - TΔS, provides the foundational thermodynamic framework, successful synthesis requires careful navigation of enthalpic contributions (ΔHmix) and processing conditions to achieve single-phase stability [1] [71]. This document provides researchers with a comprehensive toolkit for validating HEO materials, from synthesis through multi-scale characterization, with particular emphasis on protocols for probing local structural environments that ultimately dictate material performance in applications ranging from energy storage to catalysis [72].

Characterization Techniques Table

A comprehensive validation framework for HEOs requires the integration of multiple characterization techniques spanning different length scales [70]. The following table summarizes key methodologies, their specific applications, and critical experimental parameters for unraveling the complex structure of HEOs.

Table 1: Multi-scale Characterization Techniques for High-Entropy Oxides

Technique	Primary Application in HEOs	Information Scale	Key Measurable Parameters	Experimental Considerations
X-ray Diffraction (XRD)	Crystal phase identification, stability, lattice parameter determination [1]	Long-range (Å to nm)	Crystal structure, phase purity, lattice parameters [1]	Laboratory or synchrotron source; Rietveld refinement for quantitative analysis
X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS)	Local coordination environment, oxidation states [1]	Short-range (Å)	Oxidation states (XANES), bond lengths/disorder (EXAFS) [1]	Element-specific; requires synchrotron radiation; multiple cation edges
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy with EDS (STEM-EDS)	Nanoscale chemical mapping, homogeneity assessment [71]	Nano to micro	Elemental distribution, chemical homogeneity [71]	High spatial resolution; coupled with EDS for chemical analysis
Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS)	Chemical composition verification, distribution analysis [1]	Micro	Cation stoichiometry, distribution homogeneity [1]	Often coupled with SEM or STEM; quantitative analysis requires standards
X-ray Fluorescence (XRF)	Bulk composition verification [1]	Bulk	Bulk elemental composition	Non-destructive; quantitative analysis with appropriate standards

Experimental Protocols

Thermodynamics-Inspired Synthesis Protocol for Rock Salt HEOs

This protocol describes a method for synthesizing rock salt HEOs containing multivalent cations (Mn, Fe) through precise control of oxygen chemical potential, based on recent advances in thermodynamics-inspired synthesis [1].

Materials and Equipment

• Precursor Oxides: MgO, CoO, NiO, CuO, ZnO, MnO₂, Fe₂O₃ (high purity ≥99.9%)
• Milling Media: Zirconia or alumina balls
• Milling Equipment: High-energy ball mill
• Furnace: High-temperature tube furnace with gas flow control
• Atmosphere Control: Argon gas supply with oxygen getter system
• Pressing Die: Uniaxial or isostatic press
• Crucibles: Alumina or platinum crucibles

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Formulation Calculation:

  • Calculate required quantities of precursor oxides to achieve equimolar cation ratios (e.g., 20 atomic % each for 5-component system).
  • Account for oxygen content variations in precursors (e.g., MnO₂ vs. Mn₂O₃).

• Powder Mixing:

  • Weigh precursors to total 5-10g batch size using analytical balance (±0.1 mg).
  • Transfer to milling container with milling media (ball-to-powder ratio 10:1).
  • Perform high-energy ball milling for 2-6 hours in inert atmosphere.

• Pelletization:

  • Unload mixed powders in glove box to prevent moisture absorption.
  • Press into pellets (10-20 mm diameter) at 200-400 MPa using uniaxial press.
  • Use binder (e.g., 2% PVA) if needed for mechanical stability.

• Controlled Atmosphere Annealing:

  • Place pellets in alumina crucibles in tube furnace.
  • Purge furnace with argon (≥99.999% purity) for 30 minutes.
  • Heat at 5-10°C/min to 875-950°C under continuous argon flow (100-200 sccm).
  • Hold at peak temperature for 12-24 hours.
  • Cool at 5°C/min to room temperature under continuous argon flow.

• Post-processing:

  • Characterize phase purity by XRD (Section 3.2).
  • Grind portion of pellets for further characterization.
  • Store powders in desiccator to prevent hydration.

Critical Parameters

• Oxygen Partial Pressure: Maintain pO₂ between 10⁻¹⁰ to 10⁻¹⁵ bar through controlled argon flow [1]
• Temperature Ramp Rates: Controlled heating/cooling to prevent cracking and ensure equilibrium
• Cation Selection: Ionic radii within 15% difference; electronegativity compatibility [1]

Multi-scale Structural Characterization Protocol

This integrated protocol validates HEO structure from long-range crystallinity to local chemical environment.

Phase Purity and Crystallographic Analysis (XRD)

• Sample Preparation:

  • Grind annealed pellets to fine powder (~5 μm particle size).
  • Load into standard XRD sample holder, flatten surface.

• Data Collection:

  • Use Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å), 40 kV, 40 mA.
  • Scan range: 10-90° 2θ, step size 0.01°, dwell time 1-2 s/step.
  • Rotate sample during measurement to improve statistics.

• Data Analysis:

  • Identify primary phase by comparison to ICDD database.
  • Perform Rietveld refinement for lattice parameter quantification.
  • Check for secondary phases (detection limit ~1-2%).

Local Structure and Oxidation State Analysis (XAFS)

• Sample Preparation:

  • Prepare uniform thin layer of powder on adhesive tape.
  • Stack to achieve optimal absorption thickness (μx ≈ 2.5).
  • Mount in sample holder for transmission mode measurement.

• Data Collection:

  • Perform at synchrotron beamline with tunable energy range.
  • Collect data at each cation K-edge (Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn).
  • Measure in both transmission and fluorescence modes as needed.
  • Include appropriate reference compounds for energy calibration.

• Data Analysis:

  • Process XANES region to determine oxidation states through edge position comparison.
  • Analyze EXAFS region to extract bond lengths, coordination numbers, and disorder parameters.
  • Fit data using theoretical standards (FEFF, etc.).

Chemical Homogeneity Analysis (STEM-EDS)

• Sample Preparation:

  • Prepare electron-transparent samples by focused ion beam (FIB) or conventional ion milling.
  • Deposit thin carbon layer (~5 nm) to prevent charging.

• Data Collection:

  • Operate STEM at 200-300 kV with probe size ~1 nm.
  • Acquire high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) images.
  • Collect EDS spectral maps with sufficient counts for statistical analysis (>10⁴ counts per pixel).
  • Acquire data from multiple regions to ensure representative sampling.

• Data Analysis:

  • Quantify EDS spectra using standardless or standard-based quantification.
  • Calculate cation distribution homogeneity via statistical analysis of composition maps.
  • Determine any elemental segregation or clustering.

Visualization Framework

HEO Validation Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the integrated experimental workflow for synthesis and multi-scale validation of high-entropy oxides, highlighting the critical pathway from thermodynamic design to functional property assessment.

Local Structure Origins

This diagram conceptualizes the relationship between synthesis conditions, resulting local structural features in HEOs, and their emergent functional properties.

Research Reagent Solutions

The following table details essential materials and reagents required for thermodynamics-inspired synthesis and characterization of high-entropy oxides.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for HEO Synthesis and Characterization

Reagent/Material	Function/Purpose	Specifications	Handling Considerations
Precursor Oxides	Source of cationic species	High purity (≥99.9%), controlled particle size (<5 μm)	Store in desiccator; handle in dry environment to prevent hydration
Argon Gas	Inert atmosphere creation	High purity (≥99.999%) with oxygen getter system	Use continuous flow with mass flow controller for precise pO₂ control
Zirconia Milling Media	Powder homogenization	Yttria-stabilized zirconia balls (3-10 mm diameter)	Clean thoroughly between batches to prevent cross-contamination
Alumina Crucibles	High-temperature containment	High-purity alumina (99.8%), temperature resistant to 1600°C	Pre-fire at synthesis temperature to remove contaminants
XRD Standards	Instrument calibration	NIST-certified reference materials (e.g., Si, Al₂O₃)	Handle with clean tools to prevent contamination
XAFS Reference Compounds	Energy calibration and speciation	High-purity simple oxides of each cation	Prepare fresh or store protected from atmosphere
FIB Preparation Supplies	TEM sample preparation	Gallium ion source, micromanipulators, TEM grids	Requires specialized training and equipment

Data Interpretation Guidelines

Validating Single-Phase Formation

Successful HEO synthesis requires rigorous validation of single-phase formation. XRD patterns should show sharp, well-defined peaks corresponding to the target crystal structure (rock salt, spinel, perovskite) without detectable secondary phases [1]. Lattice parameters from Rietveld refinement typically follow Vegard's law, with deviations indicating non-ideal mixing or local distortion [70]. STEM-EDS elemental maps must demonstrate homogeneous cation distribution at the nanoscale, with quantitative analysis showing composition variations within ±5% of target stoichiometry [71].

Interpreting Local Structure-Property Relationships

XAFS analysis provides critical insight into the local coordination environment that governs functional properties. Key parameters include:

• Bond Length Disorder: Large Debye-Waller factors in EXAFS indicate significant local lattice distortion [70]
• Oxidation State Distribution: XANES analysis reveals if multivalent cations are coerced to target oxidation states (e.g., Mn²⁺, Fe²⁺ under low pO₂) [1]
• Cation Site Preference: Pre-edge features in XANES can indicate tetrahedral vs. octahedral site occupation in spinel structures

Correlating these local structural parameters with macroscopic properties enables establishment of structure-property relationships. For example, enhanced oxygen mobility and catalytic activity in HEOs have been linked to the high lattice distortion and oxygen vacancy populations characterized by these local probes [72].

This application note presents a comprehensive validation framework for high-entropy oxides that bridges average structure characterization with analysis of local disorder. The integrated protocols for thermodynamics-inspired synthesis and multi-scale characterization provide researchers with standardized methodologies for unraveling the complex structure-property relationships in these compositionally complex materials. By controlling oxygen chemical potential during synthesis and employing a suite of complementary characterization techniques, scientists can deliberately engineer local disorder to tailor functional properties for applications in catalysis, energy storage, and beyond [70] [1] [72]. This framework establishes a foundation for the rational design of next-generation HEOs with optimized performance characteristics.

Conclusion

The thermodynamics-inspired synthesis of high-entropy oxides represents a significant advancement in materials design, moving beyond traditional temperature-focused methods to a multidimensional approach where oxygen chemical potential is a key control parameter. This framework enables the stabilization of previously inaccessible compositions, particularly those with multivalent cations, by carefully engineering the synthesis environment. The choice of synthesis method profoundly impacts the resulting material's microstructure, homogeneity, and functional properties, making methodology selection a critical optimization axis. As validated through advanced characterization techniques, these tailored HEOs exhibit exceptional potential for applications in catalysis, energy storage, and future biomedical technologies. The ongoing challenge lies in scaling up these sophisticated synthesis techniques and further elucidating the structure-property relationships to fully harness the 'cocktail effect' of HEOs for next-generation clinical and industrial applications.

References

• 1. Thermodynamics-inspired high-entropy oxide synthesis [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63567-z]
• 2. Review The development of configurational entropy ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092583882504160X]
• 3. Expanding the search space of high entropy oxides and ... [https://arxiv.org/html/2508.13389v2]
• 4. Data-Driven Exploration of Critical Factors for Single- ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12451741/]
• 5. Thermodynamics-inspired high-entropy oxide synthesis [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40897701/]
• 6. Chemical potential [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_potential]
• 7. Thermodynamics of the O–U system. I – Oxygen chemical ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022311502013223]
• 8. sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/ high - entropy - oxides [https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/high-entropy-oxides]
• 9. Thermodynamics of high entropy oxides [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359645420308417]
• 10. Phase stability and distortion in high-entropy oxides [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359645417310492]
• 11. Lattice distortion effects in high-entropy oxides [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1383586624040061]
• 12. On the optimisation of the composition of high-entropy alloys [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10853-025-11559-1]
• 13. Lanthanide L-edge spectroscopy of high-entropy oxides [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ta/d5ta03815d]
• 14. Review of high-entropy thermoelectric materials [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925838825059304]
• 15. Can Hume-Rothery rules predict single-phase high- ... [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PMagL.10433726R/abstract]
• 16. Synthesis of High-Entropy Fluorite Oxides (Zr 0.2 Ti ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272884225046401]
• 17. Valence restrictive metal-support interaction for boosting ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64140-4]
• 18. Controlled atmosphere synthesis of g-C₃N₄ for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214714425019944]
• 19. Enabling the synthesis of O3-type sodium anion-redox ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11890782/]
• 20. Advances in high entropy oxides: synthesis, structure ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0079642524001543]
• 21. Bottom-up synthesis of 2D layered high-entropy transition ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2022/na/d1na00871d]
• 22. Electrochemical synthesis of high entropy hydroxides and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386422001217]
• 23. Facile synthesis of nanosized spinel high entropy oxide ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352847824000376]
• 24. Synthesis Strategies and Multi-field Applications of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12125468/]
• 25. Solid-state synthesis - (Inorganic Chemistry II) [https://fiveable.me/key-terms/inorganic-chemistry-ii/solid-state-synthesis]
• 26. Solid State Reaction - an overview [https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/solid-state-reaction]
• 27. Thermodynamics-Inspired High-Entropy Oxide Synthesis [https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07865]
• 28. Direct comparison of solution and solid phase synthesis of ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2019/py/c9py00558g]
• 29. Solid Phase versus Solution Phase Synthesis of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6269862/]
• 30. Mechanochemical ball milling as an emerging tool in chemical ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d5gc03507d?page=search]
• 31. Synthesis‐Driven Functionality in High‐Entropy Materials [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12590539/]
• 32. Mechanochemical Synthesis of High-Entropy Layered ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6497/6/1/5]
• 33. Influence of ball milling parameters on the mechano ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/mr/d4mr00098f]
• 34. One-Step Hydrothermal Synthesis and Characterization of ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3293/6/2/22]
• 35. Hydrothermal synthesis and energy saving potential of ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0038092X25001744]
• 36. Hydrothermal carbonization synthesis of amorphous carbon ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/na/d4na00923a]
• 37. Recently progress in molten salt-assisted synthesis ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010854525006551]
• 38. Low-temperature molten-salt enabled synthesis of highly ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63653-2]
• 39. Molten tin-salt liquid–liquid interfaces for graphite synthesis [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ta/d5ta06702b?page=search]
• 40. Solution Combustion Synthesis for Various Applications [https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/10/4/82]
• 41. Hydrothermal synthesis of SnO2/cellulose nanocomposites [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-87948-y]
• 42. Thermodynamics-inspired high-entropy oxide synthesis. [https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/openlb/publication/OLB-PM-40897701]
• 43. Synthesis of High-Entropy Oxide Nanopowders with ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12029364/]
• 44. High-Entropy Oxides: Advanced Research on Electrical ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/11/6/628]
• 45. Achieving high entropy in rare earth oxides [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1002072125000225]
• 46. The lattice distortion, mechanical and thermodynamic ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127522009303]
• 47. Impact of synthesis method on the structure and function ... [https://arxiv.org/html/2410.21774v1]
• 48. Synthesis of High-Entropy Oxide Nanopowders with ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/15/8/571]
• 49. Simple stabilizing solution leads to seven new ceramic ... [https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1106210]
• 50. High-entropy materials for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ta/d5ta03392f]
• 51. Carbon/High-Entropy Alloy Nanocomposites: Synergistic ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2313-0105/11/9/317]
• 52. Hydrocarbothermal flow synthesis of carbon-supported ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63527-7]
• 53. Synthesis of noble metal-free monodisperse high-entropy ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64796-y]
• 54. Carbon-supported high-entropy alloys as highly stable ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925838824047820]
• 55. Phase formation capability and compositional design of β- ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-36947-6]
• 56. Single-phase formation and mechanical properties of ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0955221921009523]
• 57. The X-ray absorption spectroscopy for advanced battery ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214993725003768]
• 58. Local structures and characterizations of Pt-doped FAPbI3 ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969806X24005553]
• 59. ray absorption spectroscopy analysis of aerosol particles ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-95889-9]
• 60. XAFS-based identification of the microscopic chemical ... [https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.26599/NR.2025.94907509]
• 61. Review Article High-entropy oxides: Emergent materials for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1005030225000301]
• 62. Scientists Create 7 Remarkable New Ceramic Materials by ... [https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-create-7-remarkable-new-ceramic-materials-by-simply-removing-oxygen/]
• 63. High entropy oxides for electrochemical energy storage ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378775324011595]
• 64. High‐Entropy Oxides for Rechargeable Batteries - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11220673/]
• 65. High-entropy materials for catalysis: A new frontier - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8115918/]
• 66. Recent status and challenging perspective of high entropy ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667109322002366]
• 67. High-entropy oxides for catalysis: A diamond in the rough [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ChEnJ.45138659P/abstract]
• 68. High entropy oxides: New superior supports for single atom ... [https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/68482]
• 69. High entropy oxides for reversible energy storage [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05774-5]
• 70. Disorder by design: unveiling local structure and functional ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/mh/d5mh01033k]
• 71. unveiling local structure and functional insights in high entropy ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/mh/d5mh01033k]
• 72. High entropy oxides-exploring a paradigm of promising ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127521000873]